|
|
Isaac, this is what I said: "Even if you are using a trade
mark without a view to a profit you can dilute or depreciate the goodwill
associated with that trade mark, and such loss is actionable by the
registrant."
"Isaac" <isaac@latveria.castled
|
|
|
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:26:55 GMT, anon <anon@myous.biz> wrote:
> Obviously you didn't read the rest of the posting. lol Noone said there
> can't be infringement in the non-commercial scenerio; I think I said there
Go back and check the thread. You r
|
|
|
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 07:53:21 -0600, Hank Mishkoff <Hank@WebFeats.com> wrote:
>>1) It is infringement to use a trademark in a way that creates a false
>>implication of affiliation. Affiliations are not limited to commercial
>>contexts.
>
> I agree,
|
|
|
You note that often you can fly below the radar for large corporation like
BMW, but if they find out they are entitled to pursue you. There use to be a
quiet acceptance by these corporations of people with domain names that were
confusing, especially e
|
|
|
"anon" <anon@myous.biz> wrote in message
news:jPHBb.41199$d35.7344@edtnps84...
> Obviously you didn't read the rest of the posting. lol Noone said there
> can't be infringement in the non-commercial scenerio; I think I said there
> could be where th
|
|
|
"mv" <marvit@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:3fd7ae94$0$1020$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> I am an unwilling participant in a life estate. My mother who holds the
> life estate is not allowing me to benefit from the property in my name.
|
|
|
"mv" <marvit@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message news:<3fd7ae94$0$1020$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>...
> I am an unwilling participant in a life estate. My mother who holds the
> life estate is not allowing me to benefit from the property in my name.
|
|
|
"mv" <marvit@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:3fd7ae94$0$1020$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> I am an unwilling participant in a life estate. My mother who holds the
> life estate is not allowing me to benefit from the property in my name.
>
|
|
|
Isaac, I think that we both agree that it is "possible" to infringe a trade
mark in the non-commercial scenerio where there is dilution or depreciation.
The problem is that each of these three jurisdictions set out a slightly
different test for establi
|
|
|
Let me guess, they're offering you a hundred thousand dollars, or something
like that, if you assist them in moving millions of dollars out of the
country....but the catch is you have to provide them with a certified cheque
for $10,000.00 to see if you
|
|
|
Obviously you didn't read the rest of the posting. lol Noone said there
can't be infringement in the non-commercial scenerio; I think I said there
could be where there is dilution or depreciation. Dilution or depreciation
claims are "soft" infringement
|
|
|
"Jos.Carman" <jos_carman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:654e8c6a.0312091531.466b4dae@posting.google.com...
> "Fbob" <FarmerBob@iowatelecom.net> wrote in message
news:<br24ds$bak$1@news.netins.net>...
> > "Mark2101" <markss2101@cox.net> wrote in me
|
|
|
Carolyn Meinel" <#@&@^@happyhacker.com> wrote:
>:|"CONGRESS shall make no law respecting the Establishment of Religion, nor
>:|prohibiting the free excersize thereof..." (from memory, so some words may
>:|be off)
>:|
>:|This is key, because back du
|
|
|
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 04:17:52 GMT, "Brian Wilson"
<blwilson8@comcast.net> wrote:
>Actually the guy says he is:
>
>Mr. Zakir Mehmood
>Silver Jubilee Center,
>Britto Road, Garden East,
>Karachi,pakistan
>
>If this is a spam and someone is familure
|
|
|
|
|
|
kands00@hotmail.com (HisFriend) wrote:
>:|Check this out..
>:|
>:|I just read this dissenting opinion reprinted in Whistleblower
>:|Magazine. All I can say is wow. I don't understand how this was only
>:|a dissenting opinion. The facts are so in
|
|
|
|
|
|
kands00@hotmail.com (HisFriend) wrote:
>:|Consider this..
>:|
>:|I just read this dissenting opinion reprinted in Whistleblower
>:|Magazine. All I can say is wow. I don't understand how this was only
>:|a dissenting opinion. The facts are so inc
|
|
|
|
|
|
>1) It is infringement to use a trademark in a way that creates a false
>implication of affiliation. Affiliations are not limited to commercial
>contexts.
I agree, but I don't think that the original poster was
trying to create a false impression.
|
|
|
>However, with that said the poster intended to sell the calendars and that
>clearly falls within commercial use.
You're right, I missed that. But I appreciated your
comprehensive discussion just the same!
|
|
|
"Bazza" <gb207@ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message news:<3fd3513e$0$13654$65c69314@mercury.nildram.net>...
> "J. Randy Mitchell" <mitch@mail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns944A635046EC1jmitchellcoxinternet@130.133.1.4...
> > "Peter Douglas Zohrab" <zohra
|
|
|
Actually the guy says he is:
Mr. Zakir Mehmood
Silver Jubilee Center,
Britto Road, Garden East,
Karachi,pakistan
If this is a spam and someone is familure with this particular source, that
is great but how could I know sure?
-----------------
|
|
|
There is no law against 'people from recording music off of the radio' yet
in how you use it there is. There is a "fair use" limitation for the
federal copyright holder's exclusive rights. If you just use it your
personal listening pleasure that shou
|
|
|
I recently received an email from someone from a foreign country offering me
a large amount of money - it sounds serious but before perusing any further
I would like to check the validity of the source. Could someone help me
with this? This does requ
|
|
|
US CO: Judge: Return marijuana
URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v03/n1895/a05.html
Newshawk: The GCW
Pubdate: Tue, 9 Dec 2003
Source: Steamboat Pilot & Today, The (CO)
Copyright: 2003 The Steamboat Pilot & Today
Contact: editor@steamboatpil
|
|
|
US SC: Raid at High School Leads to Racial Divide, Not Drugs
URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v03/n1895/a02.html
Newshawk: End Marijuana Prohibition: www.mpp.org
Pubdate: Tue, 09 Dec 2003
Source: New York Times (NY)
Copyright: 2003 The New
|
|
|
Isaac wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 07:47:34 GMT, Cyndi <khalamity@mchsi.com> wrote:
>
>>I need to find out what the subject matter jurisdiction is in Iowa trial
>>Courts....
>>
>
>
> That information is on the Iowa Court's official web site
|
|