|
|
"Manny Davis" <nothanks@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Xns947FD0F58EE81nothanksnowherecom@68.1.17.6...
> Donald Way <webmaster@holocaustnow.org> wrote:
>
> > We saw that alcohol prohibition failed. So we repealed it. The exact
> > same logic
|
|
|
"jitney" <jtnospam@yahoo.com> wrote
> No, that was what was scary about the US decision to invade
> Iraq, every Muslim country now has the same 'valid' reason to
> invade the US. Or at least use OPEC to cripple the US, which
> gets to the real reason
|
|
|
I divorced my X-Husband about 3 years ago now, and still have not managed to
get a Quit Claim Deed form him for the transfer of the house from Joint
Names to my Sole Name.
Our final Divorce degree states 'Michael D Hushour hereby is directed to
prov
|
|
|
Johnny wrote:
>>Donald Way wrote:
>>
>>>Brother Nate wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>we don't have kids wrapping
>>>>their cars around trees after smoking a doobie,
>>>
>>>
>>>Actually in some cases we do, albeit to a lesser extent
>>>than with alcohol.
|
|
|
"James Scott Mills" <attala@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:niai10h2uphe0herk8m36gg1p2ale9jg64@4ax.com...
> my wife was taken into her bosses office and told that she had to
> "walk" for the clerk of court to obtain signatures so the clerk of
|
|
|
No, that was what was scary about the US decision to invade
Iraq, every Muslim country now has the same 'valid' reason to
invade the US. Or at least use OPEC to cripple the US, which
gets to the real reason for the invasion?(snip)
Don't get your sho
|
|
|
Manny Davis wrote:
> Donald Way <webmaster@holocaustnow.org> wrote:
>
>
>> After all, if regulating and controlling tobacco and alcohol works,
>>then why not regulate and control the other drugs?
>
>
> If regulating and controlling drugs "w
|
|
|
Brother Nate wrote:
> Eric Johnson wrote:
>
>> Brother Nate wrote:
>> > Your side is the one that embraces law breakers who unilaterally
>> > ignore society's standards of propriety and decency.
>
>
>> We are modern day abolitionists, confron
|
|
|
Can anyone tell me if it is legal in PA to raise a bond at a preliminary
hearing, after bail is already set at arraignment and person is released on
it? Thank you for any input.
|
|
|
Manny Davis wrote:
> Brother Nate <nathan_engle@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Guido Marx wrote:
>>
>>>Since it is already illegal for a minor to posess or purchase alcohol
>>>- how does that differ from a drug like marijuana ?
>>
>>Mainly in that it is
|
|
|
Brother Nate wrote:
> Guido Marx wrote:
>
>> Since it is already illegal for a minor to posess or purchase alcohol
>> - how
>> does that differ from a drug like marijuana ?
>
>
> Mainly in that it isn't possible for every amoral 21
> year old
|
|
|
If your state has something akin to a Deceptive Trade Practices Act you
might be able to sue for damages. Misrepresentation of the amount of
floorspace is a common cause of action under this type of statute.
However, before you even bother consid
|
|
|
In article <401862a5$1_1@news.athenanews.com> "Guido Marx" <guidosjunkmail@yahoo.com> writes:
>"Pete nospam Zakel" <pxhxz@cadence.com> wrote in message
>news:4016eabb$1@news.cadence.com...
>> It is almost impossible to setup such a program for users of
|
|
|
jitney wrote:
> What is also scary about this is that other nations will use the
> precedents set here against American POW's in future wars. The whole
> point of the Geneva conventions was to provide war prisoners some
> basic protections.
I sad
|
|
|
Welcome to the real world. Most county jobs are filled by political hacks.
How did your wife get the job in the first place? Did she know someone on
the inside? If not, she must be some smokin' piece of ass. Anyway, it's
now payback time.
You
|
|
|
yup...and i am outraged
my wife was taken into her bosses office and told that she had to
"walk" for the clerk of court to obtain signatures so the clerk of
court could run for reelection in 04
when she said no she was told that anyone who did not
|
|
|
Donald Way wrote:
> Brother Nate wrote:
> > Mainly in that it isn't possible for every amoral 21
> > year old who's so inclined to walk into a local store,
> > buy a bunch of pot, and then turn it over to their
> > younger peers.
> It is that much
|
|
|
Brother Nate" <nathan_engle@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bvbqvr$crd$1@hood.uits.indiana.edu...
> Donald Way wrote:
> > Brother Nate wrote:
> > > Mainly in that it isn't possible for every amoral 21
> > > year old who's so inclined to walk into a
|
|
|
You need to go back to court. He may want you to re-finance the house so
that your name is the only one on the mortgage before
he does it, though.
"Rebecca & Peter Turner" <pdt0607@charter.net> wrote in message
news:101h1eimstqln1c@corp.supernews.co
|
|
|
Contact a solicitor or barrister,. Check the local yellow pages
and find one that deals with tenant/landlord/property law (or check with
your local solicitor/barrister association)
"Jelly Boy" <jelly.boy@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:0PRRb.31
|
|
|
"thisisme" <thisisme@cotse.net> wrote
> What would it hurt if we were to treat them as POWs?
It's pointless.
There is no 'state' with whom to negotiate (the main thrust of pow regs).
They weren't minions of the state in which they were taken; they'r
|
|
|
Mike Helm wrote:
> Brother Nate wrote:
> > As long as there are people who rationalize that "I'd rather
> > the kid smoked pot than did X", kids will continue to find
> > willing hands to supply them with the drug.
> Wouldn't you rather have kids d
|
|
|
Manny Davis wrote:
> "Johnny" <repro007@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Manny Davis wrote:
>>> Donald Way <webmaster@holocaustnow.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> After all, if regulating and controlling tobacco and alcohol
>>>> works, then why not regulate and control
|
|
|
n Thu, 29 Jan 2004 03:40:47 GMT, <540h10t5b0kukue1g7s5ng029cv29mtge1@4ax.com>
John Morris <John.Morris@UAlberta.CA> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>In <e735eee2.0401281700.77864dc7@posting.google.com> in
>alt.revisionism,
|
|
|
Minnesota
"Bubba bin Bubba" <spam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:Vj%Rb.2441$2J1.1801@fe1.texas.rr.com...
> What state?
>
> "Jane" <jarsenalnospam@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:vrQRb.483$F23.401@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> >
|
|
|
On 28-01-2004 22:09, in article bv98b8$gjt$1@hood.uits.indiana.edu, "Brother
Nate" <nathan_engle@yahoo.com> wrote:
> who I
> personally regard as a tremendously courageous even-
> heroic figure in US history).
Hey, we do agree on one thing. She
|
|
|
On 28-01-2004 21:11, in article 101g5r950mjmv9c@corp.supernews.com, "Arnold
S" <anyplace@com.com> wrote:
>
> "Eric Johnson" <erj66@xs4all.nl> wrote in message
> news:BC3DCA4E.43D36%erj66@xs4all.nl...
>> On 28-01-2004 18:38, in article bv8rvg$c75$1
|
|
|
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 03:28:27 GMT, Manny Davis <nothanks@nowhere.com>
>"Johnny" <repro007@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Manny Davis wrote:
>>> Donald Way <webmaster@holocaustnow.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> After all, if regulating and controlling tobacco and al
|
|
|
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:22:15 -0500, Brother Nate
<nathan_engle@yahoo.com>
>Donald Way wrote:
>> Brother Nate wrote:
>> > I think you're making a big leap of faith in assuming that
>> > the criminals won't just buy those drugs from a legal source
|
|
|
"jitney" <jtnospam@yahoo.com> wrote
> I am all for the war on terrorism, but if we ignore the standards of
> civilized behavior, we are no better than they are.
There are no applicable standards of civilized behaviour (as regards their
standing and
|
|
|
Back in April of last year when I was enrolled in college in Iowa, I
was living
in a house off-campus with two other students. One night while we
were all
sleeping, two students that I personally did not know walked through
our front
door and left
|
|
|
"Christopher Green" <cj.green@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:c31fa7b1.0401290844.15d5a704@posting.google.com...
> JJ <iceedge99@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<0a1h10520mn2qm04e0plhr1945mj8o147c@4ax.com>...
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have bee
|
|
|
What is also scary about this is that other nations will use the
precedents set here against American POW's in future wars. The whole
point of the Geneva conventions was to provide war prisoners some
basic protections.
During the Vietnam War, we comp
|
|
|
JJ <iceedge99@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<0a1h10520mn2qm04e0plhr1945mj8o147c@4ax.com>...
> Hello,
>
> I have been looking for a retail space for three months now. About
> 20 days ago I found the PERFECT spot! The rent is reasonable and
>
|
|
|
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:22:15 -0500, Brother Nate
<nathan_engle@yahoo.com>
>Donald Way wrote:
>> Brother Nate wrote:
>> > I think you're making a big leap of faith in assuming that
>> > the criminals won't just buy those drugs from a legal source
|
|
|
Great post!! Democrats are nothing but a bunch of aids-infected homos and lezzies.
On 29 Jan 2004, Good News <no.solicitors@is.good.4.u.&.me> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>Under our good President Bush with his fine administration
|
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Under our good President Bush with his fine administration,
we have seen some wonderful improvements here in the U.S.A.
Under Bush, we've all witnessed that long-overdue death of
telephone solicitors
|
|
|
What state?
"Jane" <jarsenalnospam@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:vrQRb.483$F23.401@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> I'll try to make this short, what type of lawyer do I need for this type
of
> problem. We refinanced our house, the pro
|
|
|
"Johnny" <repro007@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Manny Davis wrote:
>> Donald Way <webmaster@holocaustnow.org> wrote:
>>
>>> After all, if regulating and controlling tobacco and alcohol works,
>>> then why not regulate and control the other drugs?
>>
>> I
|
|
|
Guido Marx wrote:
> "Brother Nate" <nathan_engle@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:4015F656.9010304@yahoo.com...
>>
>> The biggest factor pushing the repeal of Prohibition was
>> Yellow Journalism - sensationalized reporting that distorted
>> the f
|
|
|
Guido Marx wrote:
>
> "Brother Nate" <nathan_engle@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:4014F503.7010600@yahoo.com...
> > Donald Way wrote:
> > > Who would you rather see selling harmful drugs? Law-abiding citizens
> > > who *won't* sell to kids? O
|
|
|
On 29 Jan 2004 00:35:27 +0100, Good News <no.solicitors@is.good.4.u.&.me> wrote:
Who needs detrators when you have supporters like these?
Isaac
|
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Under our good President Bush with his fine administration,
we have seen some wonderful improvements here in the U.S.A.
Under Bush, we've all witnessed that long-overdue death of
telephone solicitors. Amen to that!
|
|
|
Good News wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> Under our good President Bush with his fine administration, we have
> seen some wonderful improvements
snip////////////////
> If you consider the content of this post to be particu
|
|