|
|
so do I take him to court for the defamation and just prove my case?
".-=+ArcaMan+=-." <why> wrote in message
news:pmoph0t94bqvhu4003u3ee14bvoh2cf7v7@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 02:59:10 -0400, "sonic" <sh0ck@mail.nu> wrote:
>
> >what happens
|
|
|
".-=+ArcaMan+=-." <why> wrote in message
news:17aqh0pi7cupbb3ggo7ot8rmpc5ts6j4vb@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 20:27:53 GMT, "REDCRESTEDCARDINAL\(not ray
> gordon\)" <REDCRESTEDCARDINAL@swoops.com> wrote:
>
> >Is this legal image use? deanscrea
|
|
|
Dave Cohen <user@example.net> wrote in news:gv8Tc.13158$QE6.8479
@roc.nntpserver.com:
> AbsolutelyCertain wrote:
>
>> "Lil' Bobby Gortician" <master@mason.snuh> wrote in message
>> news:Xns9543CD08C1942spamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17...
>>
>>>
|
|
|
Dave Cohen <user@example.net> wrote in news:gv8Tc.13158$QE6.8479
@roc.nntpserver.com:
> AbsolutelyCertain wrote:
>
>> "Lil' Bobby Gortician" <master@mason.snuh> wrote in message
>> news:Xns9543CD08C1942spamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17...
>>
>>>
|
|
|
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 21:27:26 -0400, "sonic" <sh0ck@mail.nu> wrote:
>so do I take him to court for the defamation and just prove my case?
sure lets us know how much he wins!
>
>".-=+ArcaMan+=-." <why> wrote in message
>news:pmoph0t94bqvhu4003u3ee1
|
|
|
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 21:27:22 GMT, "REDCRESTEDCARDINAL\(not ray
gordon\)" <REDCRESTEDCARDINAL@swoops.com> wrote:
>
>".-=+ArcaMan+=-." <why> wrote in message
>news:17aqh0pi7cupbb3ggo7ot8rmpc5ts6j4vb@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 20:27:53 GMT, "RE
|
|
|
Is this legal image use? deanscream.com
|
|
|
his is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C48173.4092EF50
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Why should the governments tell if Al Qaida got nuclear bombs?
|
|
|
Eric Gisse <fseggNO!SPAM@uaf.edu> wrote in message news:<6l4oh0lkbt2p0skqopjkrv5vuokf915e9v@4ax.com>...
> On 12 Aug 2004 17:52:21 -0700,
> aabbcc_running_with_scissors@hotmail.com (running with scissors)
> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> KEEP THIS SHIT OUT
|
|
|
"Daniel Joseph Min" <Real.Min@Colorado.USA> wrote in message
news:jvbTc.11$sc.17408@news.uswest.net...
> > I really do live in this area. On 911 we saw the smoke and smelled it
> > across the river. Can you please post past predictions of yours t
|
|
|
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:Qa1Tc.21705831$Of.3615436@news.easynews.com...
>
>
> Daniel Joseph Min a écrit:
> > Now that we’re just two weeks six days from September 2, 2004, let us
> > consider some of the more
|
|
|
Can a State Supreme Court find an amendment to that State's
Constitution is unconstitutional? I would assume they could rely on
the US Consitution to find a part of the State Constitution invalid
(say equal protection clause) or find it invalid beca
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 20:27:53 GMT, "REDCRESTEDCARDINAL\(not ray
gordon\)" <REDCRESTEDCARDINAL@swoops.com> wrote:
>Is this legal image use? deanscream.com
>
no but you are spamming
|
|
|
AbsolutelyCertain wrote:
> "Lil' Bobby Gortician" <master@mason.snuh> wrote in message
> news:Xns9543CD08C1942spamspamsnuhspam33@207.14.113.17...
>
>>Eric Gisse <fseggNO!SPAM@uaf.edu> wrote in
>>news:6l4oh0lkbt2p0skqopjkrv5vuokf915e9v@4ax.com:
>>
|
|
|
brian bennett <shpoym@mindspring.com> wrote in
news:411CBB91.A1EC2BED@mindspring.com:
> Johnny wrote:
>>
>> brian bennett wrote:
>> > johnny wrote:
>> >>
>> >
>> >> The biggest problem by far with some drugs is their illicit nature
>> >> and
|
|
|
Johnny wrote:
>
> brian bennett wrote:
> > johnny wrote:
> >>
> >
> >> The biggest problem by far with some drugs is their illicit nature
> >> and that is why their prohibition needs to be abandoned.
> >> Unfortunately that would mean the establi
|
|
|
"Daniel Joseph Min" <Real.Min@Colorado.USA> wrote in message
news:XZ3Tc.2$ai7.20917@news.uswest.net...
> It's not my fault that you're a loathsomely under-educated milquetoast who
's too damn lazy to keep up
> with these extremely dangerous times.
|
|
|
Daniel Joseph Min a écrit:
> Now that we’re just two weeks six days from September 2, 2004, let us
> consider some of the more conspicuous upsides and downsides to the
> imminent Al-Qaeda attack(s) against the United States of America—attacks
>
|
|
|
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 02:59:10 -0400, "sonic" <sh0ck@mail.nu> wrote:
>what happens if they tell someone that we keyed his car, because we found
>this out from someone who went to the store, so he is obviously telling
>people what he thinks we did, and
|
|
|
his is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_004B_01C480E7.F3D77180
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lots of speculation - completely unfounded. IMO, if al-Qaeda had =
|
|
|
Hi, my wife recently had invisalign done, and the doctor we went to, gave a
very fast treatment (compared to other doctors). However, during the
treatment, when a couple of teeth were not moving, the doctor made her bite
some cloth, etc., and the nerve
|
|
|
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 21:19:48 -0400, "sonic" <sh0ck@mail.nu> wrote:
>My girlfriend and I just found out our names are listed in a local
>store saying we are banned from shopping there. The owner decided to ban us
>because he thought we keyed his car,
|
|
|
In article <MURSc.252300$2o2.14767764@twister.southeast.rr.com>, "Tony
Spadaro" <tspadaro@ncmaps.rr.com> wrote:
> "BTR1701" <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
> news:BTR1702-71FEFF.16462912082004@news.west.earthlink.net...
> > In article <Xns
|
|
|
what happens if they tell someone that we keyed his car, because we found
this out from someone who went to the store, so he is obviously telling
people what he thinks we did, and he isnt saying he thinks we did it, hes
saying we did do it.
"Chris
|
|
|
Eric Gisse <fseggNO!SPAM@uaf.edu> wrote in
news:6l4oh0lkbt2p0skqopjkrv5vuokf915e9v@4ax.com:
> KEEP THIS SHIT OUT OF SCI.PHYSICS
Please contribute to the discussion, or keep your demands to yourself.
No 757 Hit The Pentagon
http://www.bedoper.c
|
|
|
brian bennett wrote:
> johnny wrote:
>>
>
>> The biggest problem by far with some drugs is their illicit nature
>> and that is why their prohibition needs to be abandoned.
>> Unfortunately that would mean the establishment admitting they've
>> had
|
|
|
|
|