|
|
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 15:28:09 -0600, "Greg" <hays@yahoo.com> wrote:
>My Wife and myself were contacted by Nation Wide Credit Collectors on
>12-26-04 regarding an outstanding bill on my American Express Card. I had
>been paying on it what I could for t
|
|
|
Subcomandante wrote:
> Al, I would take your advise if I knew that anything you have described
> below could be prevented by hiring a professional sleaze ball.
> Look at Scott Peterson he had best lawyer the money can buy and got
> death penalty.
|
|
|
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 19:29:58 -0600, Jade wrote
(in message <qUNtd.17$a61.1293@news-west.eli.net>):
> First, a will on a computer is meaningless. Did you go through her things?
> Did she have an attorney? Perhaps you can run an advertisement in the l
|
|
|
y foolish opinion is that the orginal poster should do
what so many have suggested, specifically, get a lawyer.
I write with the benefit of long and painful experience.
The law means nothing. The judge can totally ignore you
and your law. He can l
|
|
|
> Not so in California; a joint tenant is free to sever his joint
> interest, effectively converting the joint tenancy to a tenancy in
> common if he (or she) does so. A joint tenant is also free to demand
> partition of the property.
>
Are you sur
|
|
|
I gave a bad answer erlier.
What you need to do is change the deed so it reads Single Man. It currently
reads single man and single woman, undivided half interest. You need it to
read single man.
Even with the error, you need her participation t
|
|
|
You can't do that without your sister's participation. If she is going to
participate, she will demand you to buy her out. If you get a new loan and
buy her interest, the same thingn will happen in the end. She will need to
participate in the refi a
|
|
|
"Rodo" <dsp1024@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:exGzd.8392$L7.3803@trnddc05...
> We both put $7k each for the downpay. At the time it was $134k. We refi
> when she move out through her employer. She worked at a financial company
> (just as a sec
|
|
|
"ElJay" <LJ@LJLJLJ.LJL> wrote in message
news:NZCdnateRe-yx1LcRVn-rA@comcast.com...
> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:10srgifa0kh0ac7@corp.supernews.com...
>>
>> "Christopher Green" <cj.green@att.net> wrote in message
|
|
|
On 26 Dec 2004, "Naughtius" wrote:
> "zan" asked:
>
>> [ Can there be circumstances when
>> a civil lawsuit defendant lawfully may
>> refuse on Fifth Amendment grounds
>> to answer a deposition question? ]
>
> No... while the Rules of Civi
|
|
|
My Wife and myself were contacted by Nation Wide Credit Collectors on
12-26-04 regarding an outstanding bill on my American Express Card. I had
been paying on it what I could for the last two months. But American Express
wanted more than I was able to
|
|
|
Buying a condo together and buying a computer or a refrigerator
together are apples and oranges.
Reasonable people buy real property, such as a condo, together with the
expectation that the property will appreciate and they will make a
profit. When
|
|
|
Christopher Green wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 01:54:06 GMT, Subcomandante
> <edicorp@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Christopher Green wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 21:39:01 GMT, Subcomandante
>>><edicorp@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
|
|
|
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 08:24:39 GMT, "Rodo" <dsp1024@yahoo.com> wrote:
>What about changing the way the deed reads ? Can it be changed from
>"TENNANTS IN COMMON" to "JOINT TENANT" ?
Would make no difference, other than to complicate matters (unless o
|
|
|
What about changing the way the deed reads ? Can it be changed from
"TENNANTS IN COMMON" to "JOINT TENANT" ?
"ElJay" <LJ@LJLJLJ.LJL> wrote in message
news:r_mdnU8M5Y_rxlLcRVn-oQ@comcast.com...
> One option would be to sell the condo, split the p
|
|
|
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 01:54:06 GMT, Subcomandante
<edicorp@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>Christopher Green wrote:
>> On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 21:39:01 GMT, Subcomandante
>> <edicorp@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I am thinking to go to District Attorney.
>>
|
|
|
I don't know anything about Minnesota law, so this answer may not
be relied on as legal advice. This answer is just discussion.
You have been sued. You have also been served with the complaint.
The questions is whether the service is valid. Some s
|
|
|
"NBT" <do.not@spam.me> wrote in message
news:do.not-0E5427.16514226122004@newsclstr01.news.prodigy.com...
>
> I am not even sorry your x-mass was ruined. The doctor was looking out
> for your best interest. If something had gone wrong, you woulld be
|
|
|
LIBERATOR@casino.com wrote:
>
> http://thespiritof76.com/
>
> PayPal has decided that the Second Amendment of the US Constitution is
> null and void. They are currently closing accounts such as ours, NOT
> because of any problems with customer ser
|
|
