|
|
In article <HBMZ2N4J38360.4561111111@anonymous.poster>
nobody@bikikii.ath.cx.invalid (Anonymous) wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> BUT OF COURSE
FOAD!
|
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
BUT OF COURSE *NONE* of your alleged claims can be publicly
verified now that "Google" has completely and thoroughly ob-
fusfacted and censored the entire usenet newsgroup archives;
i.e., unless you're using the fo
|
|
|
--WebTV-Mail-19846-2352
Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Is it so that if a credit card is just in my name and I die my wife is
responsible for the payments?, or even my adult children??? Was told tha
if
|
|
|
Larry,
You won't convince these two. The fact that the third rule of cheese
making can be misinterpreted and then inappropriately applied to law strikes
them as cosmically significant. Reason will not work.
Dave M.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In article <XAIDd.7553$wZ2.5332@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>, Subcomandante
<edicorp@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>Larry wrote:
>>
>> No, its not reasonable. While matter cannot be destroyed, evidence can
>> be. Flushing cocaine down the toilet does not
|
|
|
Ive read and have been told, that, Prof. Simon Greenleaf is regarded as
one of the worlds foremost authorities on Court Evidence ; do you agree
? Is this the general consensus found in Law Schools today ? Thank
you.
|
|
|
Besides evidence having been destroyed, so was the crime for which there
could have been evidence. No crime, no evidence of a crime, no case.
The police are supposed to furnish evidence, not a lack of it. They want to
blame others because they've no
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <5YADd.9005$5R.7306@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>, Subcomandante
> <edicorp@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Erik Interface Frampton wrote:
>>
>>>A novel defense against destruction of
>>>evidence: it's a natural law defense,
|
|
|
In article <5YADd.9005$5R.7306@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>, Subcomandante
<edicorp@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>Erik Interface Frampton wrote:
>> A novel defense against destruction of
>> evidence: it's a natural law defense, and considers laws of thermod
|
|
