|
|
In article <BLadnawe8ryK24vfRVn-gg@ez2.net>, spamcatcher@yahoo.net
says...
> > Once legal action had been started against them they had no opportunity
> > (because of lack of means) to demonstrate that they were (or weren't)
> > correct.
> >
>
>
|
|
|
In article <jqnc11pf4q9fqjl3fgao52f85bvk811jov@4ax.com>,
peterturtill@hotmail.com says...
> There is nothing that can be done against a blind
> and deaf man who hides away after throwing his stones. End of story.
>
It's a pity that the story you
|
|
|
In message <SJWdnbtiFZ5i1IvfRVn-sA@ez2.net>, Jeff Strickland
<spamcatcher@yahoo.net> writes
>YOU are a lawyer and you apparently practice in the jurisdiction where
>the libel case occurred. Why didn't you come to the aid of the
>defendent, knowing
|
|
|
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 19:27:22 +0000, Cynic <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:
>I have read almost all the various posts from yourself since before it
>all started over a year ago. Several of which have been totally
>contradictory. The latest contradict
|
|
|
"Artist" <portifino@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:V1rRd.237071$w62.97977@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> . . . . . He only showed up at my doorstep unannounced because I
> canceled payment for his work done.
> . . . . . He screamed he w
|
|
|
On 18/2/05 7:35 pm, in article 6aSdnbu7bdlo2YvfRVn-rQ@ez2.net, "Jeff
Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote:
> McD and its ilk could run an advertising campaign selling Goat Shit as smart
> pills. If they do it well enough and get people to buy go
|
|
|
Or are the Prison House Lawyers, and dis illusioned pro se wanna be's
still running this group.
Used to be a time when you could ask a question and lawyers were around
to maybe help.
Then they took over and drove them out.
To bad.
|
|
|
Thank McGyver....
Thank you for your legal advise. I will print out what your advise and call
a New Jersey attorney.
The officer stated that the clean-up was a civil matter but my actions for
not paying the contractor was criminal. Let alone being s
|
|
|
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 12:04:31 +0000, pete <peterturtill@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>>>McDo shouldn't have sued. They were onto a loser as soon as they
>>>started. I once sued a blind deaf man who persistently libeled me in
>>>another ng as well as this one
|
|
|
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:36:52 -0800, "Jeff Strickland"
<spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote:
>In this particular case, Steel and Morris took on a giant corporation, then
>complained that they were out gunned. Well, DUH!. They were outgunned from
>the outset
|
|
|
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:36:52 -0800, "Jeff Strickland"
<spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote:
snipo
>This is absurd. I don't care that I am arguing with a lawyer or not, the
>principle of the point is a falacy to begin with. The fact that the falacy
>is suppo
|
|
|
I'm a first-timer to your Newsgroup.
I was wondering if I may get some legal advice on a home improvement project
that went very bad. I live in the State of New Jersey.
Home Improvement gone bad- chimney liner:
The project started with being red
|
|
|
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:06:51 -0800, "Jeff Strickland"
<spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote:
>Well, from where I am sitting, British Law relative to libel suits seems to
>be just fine.
>
>I fully appreciate that in this instance the defendants had a diffic
|
|
|
Hi all I have a favor to ask. I am helping a friend promote a web site.
You see a childhood friend of hers lost her husband at the World Trade
Center on Sept. 1, 2001. She has run into some hard times and my freind
wants to help her. So she came up wit
|
|
|
"Richard Miller" <richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:fQwPLK79VQFCFw5F@seasalter0.demon.co.uk...
> In message <kZudncwFzKklV47fRVn-pw@ez2.net>, Jeff Strickland
> <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> writes
> >
> >"Richard Miller" <richard@seas
|
|
|
"Richard Miller" <richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:CgnI3r6iQQFCFwZu@seasalter0.demon.co.uk...
> In message <38WdndOZ8bKCnInfRVn-qw@ez2.net>, Jeff Strickland
> <crwlr@yahoo.com> writes
> >The reports I read said that McD was awar
|
|
|
"Richard Miller" <richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3N8VMRVPbmFCFwdV@seasalter0.demon.co.uk...
> In message <SJWdnbtiFZ5i1IvfRVn-sA@ez2.net>, Jeff Strickland
> <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> writes
> >YOU are a lawyer and you apparently
|
|
|
"Pat Winstanley" <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:MPG.1c807dee9cf7cec898c0ed@news.uni-berlin.de...
> In article <BLadnawe8ryK24vfRVn-gg@ez2.net>, spamcatcher@yahoo.net
> says...
> > > Once legal action had been started against the
|
|
|
"Cynic" <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:9bfc11tpivrnlqkv6u7qe3c7v11cfm3ihn@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:36:52 -0800, "Jeff Strickland"
> <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote:
>
> >In this particular case, Steel and Morris took on a gi
|
|
|
In article <pulb11h0hvbofuh28ta2fnic5mqkldk7hq@4ax.com>, pete
<peterturtill@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:51:41 +0000, Peter Pratt
> <peter_pratt@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>
> You are obviously not a new poster but your addy is brand ne
|
|
|
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:16:05 +0000, Cynic <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:
>On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 00:19:17 +0000, pete <peterturtill@hotmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>McDo shouldn't have sued. They were onto a loser as soon as they
>>started. I once sued a bli
|
|
|
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:51:41 +0000, Peter Pratt
<peter_pratt@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
You are obviously not a new poster but your addy is brand new which
leaves me to believe you have something to hide and in that case do
not expect me to answer your p
|
|
|
"Richard Miller" <richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:oxCSju$3rQFCFw8Y@seasalter0.demon.co.uk...
> In message <K6udnTrG9caVaInfRVn-oQ@ez2.net>, Jeff Strickland
> <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> writes
> >> >
> >>
> >> If McDonalds refuse
|
|
|
In article <3lca115c4uga1r15imcie99dhp2lqv3a6n@4ax.com>, pete
<peterturtill@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 19:55:56 -0800, "Jeff Strickland"
> <crwlr@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> >Am I the only one that gets this?
>
> McDo shouldn't hav
|
|
|
"Pat Winstanley" <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:MPG.1c7fc628cb140c498c0e1@news.uni-> In a book about defamation in the
UK there is a hypothetical case study,
> of a man whose professional reputation and work hinges on campaigning
|
|
|
"Pat Winstanley" <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:MPG.1c7fc628cb140c498c0e1@news.uni-berlin.de...
> In article <RO6dnVTBwrZgwYjfRVn-iw@ez2.net>, spamcatcher@yahoo.net
> says...
> > The defendants in
> > the libel case were underf
|
|
|
Note: Followup-to line will redirect all responses to this posting to
alt.revisionism
Doc Tavish wrote:
> As of this date Sara Salzman has yet to show the e-mail or USENET
post
> in which I allegedly said I was going to "skin her alive" etc. and
w
|
|
|
"Biwah" <biwah@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:BE3B3EB4.54B5D%biwah@hotmail.com...
> McDo and their ilk are destroying the health of our kids. They have made
no
> effort whatsoever to defend themselves against Supersize Me. They can't,
> because
|
|
|
"Artist" <portifino@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:V1rRd.237071$w62.97977@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> I'm a first-timer to your Newsgroup.
>
> I was wondering if I may get some legal advice on a home improvement
> project
> that we
|
|
|
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 06:38:02 +0000, Biwah <biwah@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On 17/2/05 11:02 pm, in article le8a115fff9pn1oitio2r9tnomqdtbe14g@4ax.com,
>"pete" <peterturtill@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Jeff you are an American. You are debating and arguing B
|
|
|
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 00:19:17 +0000, pete <peterturtill@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>McDo shouldn't have sued. They were onto a loser as soon as they
>started. I once sued a blind deaf man who persistently libeled me in
>another ng as well as this one and he
|
|
|
"pete" <peterturtill@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:f8jb11l226lvav728ir08mkuvsnc842utf@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 06:38:02 +0000, Biwah <biwah@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On 17/2/05 11:02 pm, in article
le8a115fff9pn1oitio2r9tnomqdtbe14g@4ax
|
|
|
"pete" <peterturtill@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:le8a115fff9pn1oitio2r9tnomqdtbe14g@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:44:57 -0800, "Jeff Strickland"
> <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote:
>
>
> >If the defendants are to be funded by the governm
|
|
|
In article <RO6dnVTBwrZgwYjfRVn-iw@ez2.net>, spamcatcher@yahoo.net
says...
> The defendants in
> the libel case were underfunded for a fight they themselves started
>
They didn't start the legal action.
Once legal action had been started again
|
|
|
Yes , the boyfriend can be a lil snitch and tell the land lord that he was
living there , but then again what proof does he have lol, it would be his
word (a person the landlord doesnt even know) agains his/her tenant, case
closed, the Op, should just
|
|
|
On 18/2/05 3:06 am, in article RO6dnVTBwrZgwYjfRVn-iw@ez2.net, "Jeff
Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote:
> If I wanted to make charges against McD, or Shell Oil, or anybody, I should
> gather up my resources long before I fired my first salvo,
|
|
|
On 17/2/05 11:02 pm, in article le8a115fff9pn1oitio2r9tnomqdtbe14g@4ax.com,
"pete" <peterturtill@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Jeff you are an American. You are debating and arguing British Law
> with The Todal ( a British Lawyer) and Richard Miller (another
|
|
|
ate: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:26:28 +0800
This staged crime is orchestrated by CIA experts, who is involved in
all local law-enforcement as well as the media entirely, in the
Denver suburban area (the media entirely globally). They are working
the perc
|
|
|
In article <3lca115c4uga1r15imcie99dhp2lqv3a6n@4ax.com>,
peterturtill@hotmail.com says...
> . I once sued a blind deaf man who persistently libeled me
In your dreams! ;-))
|
|
|
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 19:55:56 -0800, "Jeff Strickland"
<crwlr@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Am I the only one that gets this?
McDo shouldn't have sued. They were onto a loser as soon as they
started. I once sued a blind deaf man who persistently libeled me
|
|
