Legal Spring Logo

"Reviewing every type of legal service"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
Cynic wrote: > On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:41:21 -0000, "Old Codger" > <oldcodger@anyoldwhere.net> wrote: > >> Do you really believe that our august PM held an honest belief or >> did he just grab at the first thing he thought would justify an >> action


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
In article <Kq6dndelW7E0iIPfRVn-vA@ez2.net>, Jeff Strickland <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote: >My position is much the same as Cynic's, except he supports the notion that >the defendant needs or deserves financial support from the government >whereas


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
Jeff Strickland <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> writes: > >"SteveR" <dustbin@grandfathersaxe.demon.co.uk> wrote in message >news:KyTf8ePxmyFCJwg4@grandfathersaxe.demon.co.uk... >> Jeff Strickland <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> writes: >> >> [snip to save space] >


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
In article <-NKdnXc_zvA5joPfRVn-gg@ez2.net>, Jeff Strickland <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote: > >"Richard Miller" <richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote in message >news:AzG4jTUv8YHCFwJL@seasalter0.demon.co.uk... >> Point 1, there is no plaintiff in


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:27:21 -0800, "Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote: >I think that if the defendant had a strong case, they could have found a >defense team that would be willing to bill the plaintiff for their time and >trouble wh


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:41:21 -0000, "Old Codger" <oldcodger@anyoldwhere.net> wrote: >Do you really believe that our august PM held an honest belief or did he >just grab at the first thing he thought would justify an action that had >already been d


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:11:07 -0800, "Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote: > McD would never in a million years bring a >libel suit if it thought there was a snowball's chance in hell the defense >would be victorious. This is a basic funda


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:59:34 -0800, "Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote: >FACT 4 >The legal department checks out the charges to see how factual they are, and >they propose a course of action to the management structure. This course


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:18:59 -0800, "Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote: >But all of this is beside the point. The point, and the only point, is >whether or not the defense is an innocent victim of the wrath of McD, of if >McD was acti


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:58:40 -0800, "Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote: >My position is much the same as Cynic's, except he supports the notion that >the defendant needs or deserves financial support from the government >whereas I thi


Re: Daily Mail: Divorcee Targets Her Father-in-law's Fortune
On 23/2/05 11:53 am, in article 33ro119bcicp63giadtkcsfp4uo25rnmp8@4ax.com, "John-Smith" <no~spam@no~spamno~spam.co.uk> wrote: > When I last looked at this (a few years ago) there was some case law > around where a divorcing woman was able to get a b


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
Cynic wrote: > and in the second place a person who is telling an > untruth is not necessarily lying. Ask any politician. > I suspect that the defendants in this case honestly believed that the > statements in the leaflet were true. An honest


Re: 1500 Jews from Denmark FLEED, but are listed as "exterminated">Re: Holocaust mathmatically impossible
Angus wrote: > Bo Warming wrote: > > >>Hungarian and Polish Jews , that are missed, are mostly the ones > > fleeing to > >>USA and USSR , plus some dead by typhus and other infections. > > > I'm sorry mate, but as I say I personally k


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
"Cynic" <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:4cfs11hd5hv72ihb28nv0l3ueh9fh3keag@4ax.com... > On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:59:34 -0800, "Jeff Strickland" > <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote: > > > > >FACT 4 > >The legal department checks out the c


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
"SteveR" <dustbin@grandfathersaxe.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:YHwLBCF3TlHCJwgN@grandfathersaxe.demon.co.uk... > Jeff Strickland <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> writes: > > > >"SteveR" <dustbin@grandfathersaxe.demon.co.uk> wrote in message > >news:KyT


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
In article <ZICdnW1JO_H1k4DfRVn-vg@ez2.net>, Jeff Strickland <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote: >Well, if it was REALLY true, they would not need to defend it because the >plaintiff would not have argued its case that it is false. ROFL! What about


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:26:02 +0000, Richard Miller <richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote: >I don't know where you have got that idea from. You seem in your posts >to have been adopting an almost identical line to Jeff Strickland, hence >my surp


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:22:32 +0000, Richard Miller <richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote: >In message <h61q115rqlep8nu0r54lek5mgn8khel63r@4ax.com>, Cynic ><cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> writes >>On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:11:01 +0000, Richard Miller >><rich


Re: Lodi, Calif. man serves 10 years on false charge of rape
Well, should you believe this case is atypical, more than 60 percent of allegations of sexual abuse, rape and other crimes of passion are either outright false or unsubstantiated. Yet, it is a crime for which there is little defense, and 1000's of


Re: proof the holocaust is a HOAX!!!!
Damn revisionists of history . . . little Nazi socialist pigs are crawling out of the woodwork again. <LIBERATOR@casino.com> wrote in message news:1108982249.143117.265320@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... > Himmlers Speech. > > Uh, except this is


Re: DNA works, don't you feel uneasy
DNA is wonderful. It has demonstrated in recent years the corruption and abuse of an outdated justice system that is violating the civil rights of Americans nationwide. Hundreds, if not thousands of individuals are being released from prison, fals


Re: The Latest 'Brown from the Sun' - Blowtorch
I wouldn't read your rubbish if you sent it to me free of charge. Spamming is spamming, imbecile. "David Marsh" <dlmvfm@xmission.com> wrote in message news:mGQ3d.2118$ND5.96133@news.uswest.net... > FROM THE SUN > > September 27, 1938. 8:30 PM


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
"Cynic" <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:5a4r1155hgp1q90mqrh5h28q78lla8jeo3@4ax.com... > On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:40:39 -0800, "Jeff Strickland" > <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote: > > > >But it's true that they did or said all of these th


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
"Pat Winstanley" <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:MPG.1c87312a5abbe46398c174@news.uni-berlin.de... > In article <1rOdnfHLjLmxiYDfRVn-ug@ez2.net>, spamcatcher@yahoo.net > says... > > But it's true that they did or said all of these


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
"Richard Miller" <richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:2yuljRTP6YHCFwO+@seasalter0.demon.co.uk... > In message <1rOdnfHLjLmxiYDfRVn-ug@ez2.net>, Jeff Strickland > <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> writes > > > >"Richard Miller" <richard@seas


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
"Richard Miller" <richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:giAgHyS20YHCFwM+@seasalter0.demon.co.uk... > In message <ZICdnW1JO_H1k4DfRVn-vg@ez2.net>, Jeff Strickland > <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> writes > > > >"Pat Winstanley" <boredofspam2


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
"Alun L. Palmer" <elektros@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Xns9606F0053944Celektrosmdonet@81.174.12.30... > "Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in > news:ZICdnW1JO_H1k4DfRVn-vg@ez2.net: > > > > > "Pat Winstanley" <boredofspam2004@yahoo


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
"Richard Miller" <richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:Kjr63wUa+YHCFwIT@seasalter0.demon.co.uk... > In message <572q119gofrpnph6lh46oips0g3qvp4k3i@4ax.com>, Cynic > <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> writes > >Perhaps you misunderstand my posi


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
"Richard Miller" <richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:AzG4jTUv8YHCFwJL@seasalter0.demon.co.uk... > In message <_6CdnQe4bOy1lIDfRVn-2w@ez2.net>, Jeff Strickland > <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> writes > > > >"Richard Miller" <richard@seas


Re: crimes
arlene Ketchum wrote: > I have a question maybe someone could answer for me. If a person is run over > by a car and suffers fatal injuries and will eventually die from them is > also struck by a stray bullet from someone shooting up in the air killing


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
In message <UfWdnWJ6EMO3lYDfRVn-uw@ez2.net>, Jeff Strickland <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> writes >You should stop inferring that I said they were lying. I have already identified and posted four occasions when you said that they were lying. And you rep


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:40:39 -0800, "Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote: >But it's true that they did or said all of these things, and lost. They >lied. It is not my opinion they lied, it is McD's position they (Steel and >Morris, et a


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:16:06 -0800, "Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote: > >"Pat Winstanley" <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message >news:MPG.1c86bea2d1eea8ba98c161@news.uni-berlin.de... >> In article <6OqdnfP0GYsLQ4bfRVn-vw@ez2


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
In message <572q119gofrpnph6lh46oips0g3qvp4k3i@4ax.com>, Cynic <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> writes >Perhaps you misunderstand my position. I am not arguing that >defendants in a libel case should not get legal aid - I very much >welcome the judgement.


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
In message <_6CdnQe4bOy1lIDfRVn-2w@ez2.net>, Jeff Strickland <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> writes > >"Richard Miller" <richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote in message >news:s8IDAI8WWNHCFwc2@seasalter0.demon.co.uk... >> In message <4acp1110c73bk76ajvacaa8


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
In message <h61q115rqlep8nu0r54lek5mgn8khel63r@4ax.com>, Cynic <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> writes >On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:11:01 +0000, Richard Miller ><richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote: > >>>Not at all, and I'm surprised you have taken exception to


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
In message <1rOdnfHLjLmxiYDfRVn-ug@ez2.net>, Jeff Strickland <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> writes > >"Richard Miller" <richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote in message >news:vZ+TpVSMyDHCFw$d@seasalter0.demon.co.uk... >> In message <afqdnbZr0bAzKobfRVn-hw@


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
In message <ZICdnW1JO_H1k4DfRVn-vg@ez2.net>, Jeff Strickland <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> writes > >"Pat Winstanley" <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message >news:MPG.1c86bea2d1eea8ba98c161@news.uni-berlin.de... >> In article <6OqdnfP0GYsLQ4bfRVn-


FT: Food groups get taste of fear
ood groups get taste of fear By Jeremy Grant Financial Times Published: February 23 2005 18:38 Photo: http://news.ft.com/cms/e312d476-47ac-11d8-81c6-0820abe49a01.jpg http://tinyurl.com/6mh5h Pam Murtaugh holds up some packaging with a pictu


Re: My house raided for bull#@($..
by the way, the local police not only had to pay restitution, but had to pay punitive damages over the raids here -- -- -- davon96720 IM@ yahoo, aim, aol, msn davon96720@hotmail davon96720@yahoo.com http://members.triopod.com/davon96720 No


1500 Jews from Denmark FLEED, but are listed as "exterminated">Re: Holocaust mathmatically impossible
"LIBERATOR" <LIBERATOR@casino.com> wrote in message news:1109068006.252912.44890@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... snip >> with you. If the number isn't six million but four million, would > > you agree it's still a holocaust? snip > Then you have t


Re: W Post: McDonald's Protesters Win in Court
"Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in news:ZICdnW1JO_H1k4DfRVn-vg@ez2.net: > > "Pat Winstanley" <boredofspam2004@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message > news:MPG.1c86bea2d1eea8ba98c161@news.uni-berlin.de... >> In article <6OqdnfP0GYsLQ4bfRVn


Re: 1500 Jews from Denmark FLEED, but are listed as "exterminated">Re: Holocaust mathmatically impossible
Bo Warming wrote: > Hungarian and Polish Jews , that are missed, are mostly the ones fleeing to > USA and USSR , plus some dead by typhus and other infections. I'm sorry mate, but as I say I personally know a lady who was transported from Hungary


Re: Holocaust mathmatically impossible
And I would call you an ignorant Jew-Hating cunt who hasn't the brains of a piss-ant. "clintonG" <csgallagher@REMOVETHISTEXTmetromilwaukee.com> wrote in message news:nZ6Td.13319$3V3.10687@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com... :> Well, I happen to be right


crimes
I have a question maybe someone could answer for me. If a person is run over by a car and suffers fatal injuries and will eventually die from them is also struck by a stray bullet from someone shooting up in the air killing them instantly, who is guilt


Re: Holocaust mathmatically impossible
"The Real Riain" <riain@riain.com> wrote in message news:1_-dnc5jIYBmuoDfRVn-hQ@comcast.com... > And I would call you an ignorant Jew-Hating cunt who hasn't the brains > of a piss-ant. HE DID NOT EVEN MENTION JEW BY NAME! ARE YOU STUPID OR SICK? OR


Re: Holocaust mathmatically impossible
"clintonG" <csgallagher@REMOVETHISTEXTmetromilwaukee.com> wrote in message news:nZ6Td.13319$3V3.10687@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com... >> Well, I happen to be right near West Bloomfield, Michigan, and the >> Holocaust Museum. I've always thought they did i


Re: Holocaust mathmatically impossible
"dandelion" <dandelion@meadow.net> wrote in message news:421b621f$0$173$e4fe514c@dreader16.news.xs4all.nl... > > "LIBERATOR" <LIBERATOR@casino.com> wrote in message > news:1109084772.715911.89080@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... >> >> dandelion wr


Attorney Stephen R. Pappas: found guilty of cheating his elderly clients
Attorney Stephen R. Pappas, State Bar No.:158560, 550 South California Avenue, Suite 320, Palo Alto, California 94306-1441; Facsimile: (650) 858-8508; Email: sportlaw1@aol.com has been found guilty by the California State Bar Mandatory Fee Arbitratio


Re: Food groups get taste of fear
"sufaud" <sufaud@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:BE433C3E.57D0D%sufaud@hotmail.com > Food groups get taste of fear > By Jeremy Grant sufaud@hotmail.com gets taste of killfile. -- use hotmail for email replies