|
|
You're full of bull#@($, and all the claims you're making are bull#@($.
It's FBI/CIA orchestrated lies that you've said, and they're the ones
behind the DNA practices being accepted & used constantly. They target
people and will set them up, DNA ma
|
|
|
On 24/2/05 7:42 pm, in article 111sbgq39bgj7b7@corp.supernews.com,
"Incalcitrant" <Incalcitrant@linkline.com> wrote:
> more than 60 percent of
> allegations of sexual abuse, rape and other crimes of passion are either
> outright false or unsubstanti
|
|
|
On 25/2/05 4:29 pm, in article q6ku1119v64kfomml7mu670nu92p5el9an@4ax.com,
"John-Smith" <no~spam@no~spamno~spam.co.uk> wrote:
> The key is that, loosely speaking, the UK divorce court works behind
> closed doors, nobody can report on the proceedings
|
|
|
Hi everybody
I wonder if you could give me an advice on the following fact that
happened to us last July 2004.
We are a clinic in Venezuela and we received a payment in a cashier's
check (about $8000) from a New York patient. The check was issued by
|
|
|
In article <taydnaVmJN8U_IPfRVn-vA@ez2.net>,
Jeff Strickland <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote:
>All statements I made were paraphrased from the public record.
That gives you no protection whatsoever. The only facts to prove are:
Did you make tho
|
|
|
sufaud <sufaud@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> When I last looked at this (a few years ago) there was some case law
>> around where a divorcing woman was able to get a bigger slice of the
>> matrimonial assets because her husband had an elderly relative wh
|
|
|
"Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in
news:X_GdnRGP46g1u4PfRVn-qA@ez2.net:
>
> "Richard Miller" <richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:2yuljRTP6YHCFwO+@seasalter0.demon.co.uk...
>> In message <1rOdnfHLjLmxiYDfRVn-ug
|
|
|
"Alun L. Palmer" <elektros@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns96086466CA7B2elektrosmdonet@81.174.12.30...
>
> He's not ignoring it and it's not a fundamental. It' s not entirely
unknown
> for someone to bring a libel suit over allegations that are
|
|
|
"Cynic" <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:ki1u11dkut1cg2368v71sg96fcle63j4it@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:55:00 -0800, "Jeff Strickland"
> <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> >What I can't escape is the idea that the ruling
|
|
|
Everyone is guilty of something . . . our courts are supposed to be operated
according to the rule of law, and that is all that need be stated. I
disagree with your comment about "guilt beyond reasonable doubt." That may
not be the manner in which
|
|
|
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:55:00 -0800, "Jeff Strickland"
<spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote:
>What I can't escape is the idea that the ruling here will be abused by
>people that simply want to drag a company like McD through the courts, so
>they go arou
|
|
|
On 24 Feb 2005 22:20:47 GMT, jfh@avondale.demon.co.uk (John F Hall)
wrote:
>Incidentally a newspaper published photographs of the defendants with a
>headline "Murderers", challenging them to sue for libel. They didn't.
>Of course the newspaper di
|
|
|
Washington Post
Reporters' Phone Records Are Protected, Court Rules
U.S. Attorney Can't Force N.Y. Times to Supply Documents
By John Mintz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, February 25, 2005; Page A03
The New York Times has a qualified righ
|
|
|
"clintonG" <csgallagher@REMOVETHISTEXTmetromilwaukee.com> wrote in message
news:nZ6Td.13319$3V3.10687@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
>> Well, I happen to be right near West Bloomfield, Michigan, and the
>> Holocaust Museum. I've always thought they did i
|
|
|
Doc Tavish wrote:
> BLTN= Better Late Than Never
>
> From: Joel Rosenberg <joelr@ellegon.com>
> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103)
> X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,alt.lawyers,alt
|
|
