|
|
jim <jim@nomail.com> writes:
>On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 00:38:51 +0000 (UTC), Erotic Green Spores
><gs@lios.apana.org.au> wrote:
>>stevejdufour@yahoo.com writes:
>>
>>>What do you think of making a post on Usenet consisting of
>>>Shakespeare's quote,
|
|
|
> Invading another country for no reason is an
> act of terrorism.
I agree with that.
|
|
|
I would consider most of them Liars and not lawyers.
Kurt Knoll.
"James A. Chamblee" <jim-chamblee@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:BE604CC0.13995%jim-chamblee@mindspring.com...
>
>
> > From: stevejdufour@yahoo.com
>
> > What do you think
|
|
|
> From: stevejdufour@yahoo.com
> What do you think of making a post on Usenet consisting of
> Shakespeare's quote, "The first thing we do, let's kill all the
> lawyers" followed by a list of names and addresses of lawyers? Do you
> think a per
|
|
|
unknown wrote:
> You are the Troll,
> Until a person is convicted in this country, they are not criminals.
You
> are only a criminal after you have been convicted of a crime in a
court of
> law. Not your mind
You could be going someplace you d
|
|
|
Shelly,
There are lawyers in your local phonebook who specialize in medical
malpractice, give free initial consults, and work on a contingency fee
basis. Your mother should make appointments with several, meet with them,
get opinions on her c
|
|
|
|
|
|
> > I would consider most of them Liars and not lawyers.
> >
> > Kurt Knoll.
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> More wit and wisdom from the brain-damaged community:
>
>
> If somebody is a lawyer, he can't be a iiar
>
> If somebody lies, he can't be a lawy
|
|
|
"Thoth" wrote
> And it follows that Congress will promptly respond, because we
> all know how consumer friendly and fiscally responsible they are.
Who voted them in?
|
|
|
Kurt Knoll wrote:
> I would consider most of them Liars and not lawyers.
>
> Kurt Knoll.
>
>
More wit and wisdom from the brain-damaged community:
If somebody is a lawyer, he can't be a iiar
If somebody lies, he can't be a lawyer
|
|
|
"Tim" <me@home.uk> wrote in message
news:d1e71v$60u$1@titan.btinternet.com...
> "Thoth" wrote
>> And it follows that Congress will promptly respond, because we
>> all know how consumer friendly and fiscally responsible they are.
>
> Who voted them
|
|
|
In article <1111122693.858398.155190@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
stevejdufour@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>Glad to hear it. I'm sure you did some good.
Why does it make you excited to be sure he did some good?
--
Lady Chatterly
"There's a few Usene
|
|
|
In article <1111121793.757822.129940@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Joe Bruno <bruno@indystart.com> wrote:
>
>If I were that person, I'd get that post removed from the Google
>archives asap.
>>
>> Are you a lawyer?
Does it seem like he is a lawyer
|
|
|
On 18 Mar 2005 01:33:23 GMT, King of Brawl Hall <master@mason.snuh>
drained his beer, leaned back in the alt.conspiracy beanbag and
drunkenly proclaimed the following
>Skipper <skipspamless@charter.net> wrote in news:170320051726592089%
>skipspamless@
|
|
|
stevejdufour@yahoo.com wrote:
> Joe Bruno wrote:
> > stevejduf...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > Joe Bruno wrote:
> > > > stevejduf...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > > > What do you think of making a post on Usenet consisting of
> > > > > Shakespeare's quote, "Th
|
|
|
Skipper <skipspamless@charter.net> wrote in news:170320051726592089%
skipspamless@charter.net:
> X-No-archive: yes
>
> In article <1111094301.943298.261100@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
> <stevejdufour@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> What do you think
|
|
|
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 00:38:51 +0000 (UTC), Erotic Green Spores
<gs@lios.apana.org.au> wrote:
>stevejdufour@yahoo.com writes:
>
>>What do you think of making a post on Usenet consisting of
>>Shakespeare's quote, "The first thing we do, let's kill all
|
|
|
stevejdufour@yahoo.com writes:
>What do you think of making a post on Usenet consisting of
>Shakespeare's quote, "The first thing we do, let's kill all the
>lawyers" followed by a list of names and addresses of lawyers? Do you
>think a person migh
|
|
