alt.lawyers

Jay, The document describes a unit as the space enclosed by various things, floors, exterior walls, et c. after this description it goes on to define windows, doors, vents, et c. as parts of the unit. This may at first seem ambiguous but the s

To the once-Pre-Med student: Astute observation indeed. However, we must always be careful not to stereotype. There are good and bad everywhere, but the law tends to breed disordered human beings, in my view. I surely loved and respected my lawye

hanks so much Lowell, if I may take that liberty. You lawyers are all so smart, surely way beyond me, and your analysis is on the money. It is the same analysis with which I'm being flooded by friends from many fields. Of course, we can't talk law

On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 01:14:43 GMT, Joe Moore <munged@bad.example.com> wrote: >Larry <larry@x.com> wrote: > >>In article <9f4861daqcm5nu39kpgha2iuhjs1fhrha3@4ax.com>, >> Joe Moore <munged@bad.example.com> wrote: >> >>> Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> w

In article <9f4861daqcm5nu39kpgha2iuhjs1fhrha3@4ax.com>, Joe Moore <munged@bad.example.com> wrote: > Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote: > > > >Now, were the Colorado Bar Examiners and the Colorado Supreme Court > >secret cult followers of the c

In article <d410ge$mpj$1@reader1.panix.com>, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: > In article <larry-0D2947.12291017042005@news1.east.earthlink.net>, > Larry <larry@x.com> wrote: > > >Suppose you want a driver's license. You can't take the

A Petition for Certiorari to the United States Supreme Court requires ability to distill complex issues, facts and legal research into a small booklet that must pique the interest of at least one of the nine Justices, upon first glance, and make it th

A lot depends on what you were convicted of and how long ago your conviction was. If you are applying for a position of trust, then a crime involving fundamental dishonesty, what the state bar calls "moral turpitude", then you may have a problem. If

Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote: >Now, were the Colorado Bar Examiners and the Colorado Supreme Court >secret cult followers of the charismatic Reverend Bob Larson or were >they merely public-minded officials trying to evaluate a multitude of >c

I was adjudicated guilty as a juvenile in New Jersey. I am not eligible for expungement. If a potential employer were to ask me if I had ever been fingerprinted. Would I be required to answer yes? Is there any way the employer could obtain these re

In article <larry-0D2947.12291017042005@news1.east.earthlink.net>, Larry <larry@x.com> wrote: >Suppose you want a driver's license. You can't take the written exam, >refuse to take the road test, and then complain that you weren't issued >a lice

On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 20:24:45 GMT, Joe Moore <munged@bad.example.com> wrote: >Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote: > > >>Now, were the Colorado Bar Examiners and the Colorado Supreme Court >>secret cult followers of the charismatic Reverend Bob Larso

On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 19:06:54 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: >In article <larry-0D2947.12291017042005@news1.east.earthlink.net>, >Larry <larry@x.com> wrote: > >>Suppose you want a driver's license. You can't take the written

Hmmm. It just seems to me that when I read it very carefully, the window is merely listed as an element enclosing the unit. Are you sure you read it carefully? Thanks, Jay <<Jay, My interpretation is that windows are a defined part of

That's exactly what I thought, and exactly what my brother thought. The reason I'm asking is because my Association says that this was originally interpreted as saying that Windows are a part of the unit. Whomever interpreted this did not read it

Jay, My interpretation is that windows are a defined part of the unit for whatever purpose this definition of unit is intended. There may be other definitions of unit that are used in other sections of this document however. Dave M.

Please read this section and tell me if Windows, as described in section (a) are considered to be: 1) listed in section (a) as being part of the unit itself or 2) merely listed in section (a) as one of the structural elements enclosing the unit.

Notify the association in writing. Quote the language describing the windows as a part of the enclosure. The language is pretty clear. They are probably responsible for replacing or repairing the window frames unless otherwise provided for elsewhere

"jay" <jaynews@verizon.net> wrote in message news:UuR8e.11417$ok4.6807@trndny07... > That's exactly what I thought, and exactly what my brother thought. The > reason I'm asking is because my Association says that this was originally > interprete

Clearly, sub-paragraph (a) says that the unit consists of the space enclosed by the exterior walls, including the windows. Additionally, each unit also consists of the interior walls and any such attachments that beocme permanant. Basically they are

According to the language you provided, the windows are a part of the exterior walls or "enclosure" and are not a part of the unit. This write-up is typical and makes sense. If you change the windows, e.g. the size or type, you change the overall qua

On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Jon Beaver wrote: >> On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Larry wrote: >> >>> No. What I am talking about is that Ken can't complain about being >>> denied a law license, because by all accounts he didn't finish the >>> application proces

<dhm@best.com> wrote in message news:20050418034315.A49937@dhm.best.vwh.net... > > > >>>>> Rules of procedure, rules of evidence, appeal, impeachment, and checks > >>>>> and balances all minimize the occurrences of this and provide remedies > >>

>>>>> Rules of procedure, rules of evidence, appeal, impeachment, and checks >>>>> and balances all minimize the occurrences of this and provide remedies >>>>> when it does happen. Just because we cannot design a perfect system >>>>> doesn't mean

In article <1113791042.403167.73600@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>, "solar" <williamtmaxwell@aol.com> wrote: > Jon Beaver wrote > >> forevernitefan wrote > > >> Ken has rightly argued that the psych evaluation for his law license > was both impro

<dhm@best.com> wrote in message news:20050417202425.L42759@dhm.best.vwh.net... > > > On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Larry wrote: > > > No. What I am talking about is that Ken can't complain about being > > denied a law license, because by all accounts he

In article <20050417202425.L42759@dhm.best.vwh.net>, dhm@best.com wrote: > On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Larry wrote: > > > No. What I am talking about is that Ken can't complain about being > > denied a law license, because by all accounts he didn't fin

On 17-Apr-2005, "Bob" <Sherins@bellsouth.net> wrote: > What are you lawyers thinking? Are you so dispassionate that you can > witness injustice without lifting a finger. Or is the fraternity so > driven from the top that you're afraid that any ki

On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Larry wrote: > No. What I am talking about is that Ken can't complain about being > denied a law license, because by all accounts he didn't finish the > application process. Then you don't know jack-#@($ about what everyo