|
|
Seth Breidbart wrote:
> In article <ik7a61hf5tarm2kba13e3k2q8a6107r79d@4ax.com>,
> Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote:
>>On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 04:44:49 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth
>>Breidbart) wrote:
>>>In article <larry-C4310F.18534218042005@ne
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>Jon Beaver wrote:
>>>>We all agree that your mental fitness is absolutely none of the
>>>>governments damn business as long as you are not a danger to yourself or
>>>>othe
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 15:57:38 GMT, Joe Moore <munged@bad.example.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>For me the issue is raised by the apparent lack of facts behind the
>>decision of the Colorado Bar Examiners to require a psychiatric exam
>>b
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart wrote:
> In article <larry-DF799C.13125019042005@news1.east.earthlink.net>,
> Larry <larry@x.com> wrote:
>>In article <42652A8F.4030403@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>
>>> That's about the size of it. As Geragos put it
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart wrote:
> In article <larry-BF71A4.13413819042005@news1.east.earthlink.net>,
> Larry <larry@x.com> wrote:
>>In article <42654271.8020900@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>Larry wrote:
>>>>It can never be a "fact" that yo
|
|
|
In article <ik7a61hf5tarm2kba13e3k2q8a6107r79d@4ax.com>,
Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 04:44:49 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth
>Breidbart) wrote:
>>In article <larry-C4310F.18534218042005@news1.east.earthlink.net>,
>>La
|
|
|
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 05:48:37 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Larry wrote:
>> In article <4265A658.3010806@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>Jon Beaver wrote:
>>>
>>>>It's not even (merely) an accusation. It's (merely) a statement
|
|
|
In article <larry-BF71A4.13413819042005@news1.east.earthlink.net>,
Larry <larry@x.com> wrote:
>In article <42654271.8020900@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>> Larry wrote:
>> > It can never be a "fact" that you abused the legal process.
|
|
|
In article <larry-DF799C.13125019042005@news1.east.earthlink.net>,
Larry <larry@x.com> wrote:
>In article <42652A8F.4030403@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>> >
>> That's about the size of it. As Geragos put it, "opinion dresed up
>>
|
|
|
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 05:47:23 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Jon Beaver wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 02:03:11 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>Jon Beaver wrote:
>>>>On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 00:43:00 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
|
|
|
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 15:57:38 GMT, Joe Moore <munged@bad.example.com>
wrote:
>For me the issue is raised by the apparent lack of facts behind the
>decision of the Colorado Bar Examiners to require a psychiatric exam
>based on behavior which doesn't s
|
|
|
The New York Times
April 19, 2005
EDITORIAL OBSERVER
Psst ... Justice Scalia ... You Know, You're an Activist Judge, Too
By ADAM COHEN
Not since the 1960's, when federal judges in the South were threatened
by cross burnings and firebombs, ha
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <42655324.7070807@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Larry wrote:
>>
>>>The bar committee is not the prosecutor. They're the initial finder of
>>>fact.
>>
>> They are prosecutors, both in function and in form.
|
|
|
dhm@best.com wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Jon Beaver wrote:
>
>>> According to the documents on his website, the examiners denied his
>>> 'application to practice law without even a word of explanation as to
>>> the reason for the denial, thereby
|
|
|
hobbitfan111@yahoo.com wrote:
> Martin Holterman wrote:
>
>>stevejdufour@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>>>If I feel I have something to say and print it in a book do I have
>
> the
>
>>>right to sell the books in a public place? Or do I have to buy or
|
|
|
Lowell,
Sorry, as usual I missed responding to a question. For The Florida
Bar, the matter ended in November, 2002, 6 months after it started,
when it "closed" the investigation. For me, it is still going on
because 1) No agency of my government i
|
|
|
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Jon Beaver wrote:
>> According to the documents on his website, the examiners denied his
>> 'application to practice law without even a word of explanation as to the
>> reason for the denial, thereby making any semblance of mea
|
|
|
"Sanders Kaufman" <unsent@kaufman.net> wrote in message
news:Xrd9e.555$yd7.12@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com...
> "Mike Flannigan" <mikef@flanniganelectric.com> wrote in message
> news:dVa9e.103963$vK6.76309@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
> > "Sanders Kaufma
|
|
|
zerove...@gmail.com wrote:
> Uh no. Since *your* livingroom is YOURS, no one has any rights to
use
> it except you and those you grant permission to. The point about
> natural law is that everyone has the right to do whatever they want
so
> long
|
|
|
"Sanders Kaufman" <unsent@kaufman.net> wrote in message
news:Vrd9e.554$yd7.198@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com...
>
> "Bill Walker" <bill.walker2@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:Uu99e.20766$H_5.12523@trnddc01...
> >
> > "Jeb" <Jeb@jeb.com> wrote i
|
|
|
"Mike Flannigan" <mikef@flanniganelectric.com> wrote in message
news:dVa9e.103963$vK6.76309@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
>
> "Sanders Kaufman" <unsent@kaufman.net> wrote in message
> news:eo29e.462$yd7.258@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com...
> > http://www.
|
|
|
"Mike Flannigan" <mikef@flanniganelectric.com> wrote in message
news:dVa9e.103963$vK6.76309@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
> "Sanders Kaufman" <unsent@kaufman.net> wrote in message
>> Americans should never forget how the Republicans behaved during
>>
|
|
|
"Bill Walker" <bill.walker2@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:Uu99e.20766$H_5.12523@trnddc01...
>
> "Jeb" <Jeb@jeb.com> wrote in message
> news:1q79e.477$yd7.229@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com...
>> Welcome back Bill Walker!
>>
>> I surmise your mo
|
|
|
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 02:03:11 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Jon Beaver wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 00:43:00 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>Jon Beaver wrote:
>>
>>>>>What did the courts where he filed say about his use/abuse of
|
|
|
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 01:21:59 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com>
wrote:
>On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 23:29:28 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth
>Breidbart) wrote:
>
>>In article <larry-DF799C.13125019042005@news1.east.earthlink.net>,
>>Larry <larry@x.c
|
|
|
In article <42655324.7070807@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> Larry wrote:
> >
> > The bar committee is not the prosecutor. They're the initial finder of
> > fact.
>
> They are prosecutors, both in function and in form. How can
|
|
|
stevejdufour@yahoo.com wrote:
> If I feel I have something to say and print it in a book do I have the
> right to sell the books in a public place? Or do I have to buy or rent
> a store? Or try to sell them to someone who does have a store? What do
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <426542D8.8040605@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Larry wrote:
>>>In article <426533CB.8020201@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>>Larry wrote:
>>>>>In article <425E5A49.9090309@it.com>, Ken Smith <forg
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <426542D8.8040605@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Larry wrote:
>>
>>>In article <426533CB.8020201@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Larry wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In article <425E5A49.90903
|
|
|
In article <426547F6.7020506@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> Larry wrote:
> > In article <42654271.8020900@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> >>Larry wrote:
> >>>In article <42652A8F.4030403@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wr
|
|
|
In article <426542D8.8040605@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> Larry wrote:
> > In article <426533CB.8020201@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> >>Larry wrote:
> >>>In article <425E5A49.9090309@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wr
|
|
|
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 00:43:00 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Jon Beaver wrote:
>>>What did the courts where he filed say about his use/abuse of the
>>>legal process? If the courts say he abused it, that's one thing. If
>>>the courts the c
|
|
|
<hobbitfan111@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1113936603.443882.239200@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Martin Holterman wrote:
> > stevejdufour@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > If I feel I have something to say and print it in a book do I have
> the
>
|
|
|
Michael Price wrote:
> Brian Mason wrote:
>> In all public places in urban areas there are ordnances requiring a
>> permit to sell goods. The permit may be trivial - 5 minutes at city
>> hall or a bureaucratic nightmare. Usually there are zoning
>>
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <42654271.8020900@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Larry wrote:
>>>In article <42652A8F.4030403@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> That's about the size of it. As Geragos put it, "opinion dr
|
|
|
In article <42654271.8020900@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> Larry wrote:
> > In article <42652A8F.4030403@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> >
> >> That's about the size of it. As Geragos put it, "opinion dresed up
> >>as
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <42652D41.8040907@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>
>> Your belief that Jesus rose from the dead leads us to suspect that
>>you are bat-#@($ crazy, and on account of that fact, we're
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <42652CC7.60208@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Larry wrote:
>
>
>>>But I think even more people would agree that someone who does not
>>>complete the bar application process should not be granted a law licen
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <426533CB.8020201@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Larry wrote:
>>>In article <425E5A49.9090309@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>>Larry wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>No one is putting any restraint on your s
|
|
|
"Sneezbug" <sneezbug@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:81b9e.2886$Gq6.2787@fe02.lga...
> if I taking the ohio dept of taxation to court - eneventhough i never
> lived in
> ohio, where should i file, wv or oh? also in which court/s can i do this
>
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <42652A8F.4030403@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>
>> That's about the size of it. As Geragos put it, "opinion dresed up
>>as fact." No caselaw or established facts; just "We conclude X." And
>>that is not
|
|
|
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 23:31:24 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth
Breidbart) wrote:
>In article <larry-BF71A4.13413819042005@news1.east.earthlink.net>,
>Larry <larry@x.com> wrote:
>>In article <42654271.8020900@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrot
|
|
|
In article <42652D41.8040907@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
> Your belief that Jesus rose from the dead leads us to suspect that
> you are bat-#@($ crazy, and on account of that fact, we're going to
>
|
|
|
In article <42652CC7.60208@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> Larry wrote:
> >
> > But I think even more people would agree that someone who does not
> > complete the bar application process should not be granted a law license.
>
>
|
|
|
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 23:29:28 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth
Breidbart) wrote:
>In article <larry-DF799C.13125019042005@news1.east.earthlink.net>,
>Larry <larry@x.com> wrote:
>>In article <42652A8F.4030403@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrot
|
|
|
In article <42652A8F.4030403@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> >
> That's about the size of it. As Geragos put it, "opinion dresed up
> as fact." No caselaw or established facts; just "We conclude X." And
> that is not "good cause" f
|
|
|
In article <426533CB.8020201@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> Larry wrote:
> > In article <425E5A49.9090309@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> >>Larry wrote:
> >>
> >>>No one is putting any restraint on your speech. You can com
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Jon Beaver wrote:
>>> We all agree that your mental fitness is absolutely none of the
>>> governments damn business as long as you are not a danger to yourself or
>>> others -- or unless YOU place i
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On 17 Apr 2005 19:24:02 -0700, "solar" <williamtmaxwell@aol.com>
> wrote:
>>Jon Beaver wrote
>>>>forevernitefan wrote
>>>
>>>>Ken has rightly argued that the psych evaluation for his law license
>>>>was both improper and unusual
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 04:09:17 +0000, dhm@best.com wrote:
>>On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Jon Beaver wrote:
>>>>On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Larry wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>No. What I am talking about is that Ken can't complain about being
>>>>>denie
|
|
