|
|
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 01:27:36 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth
Breidbart) wrote:
>In article <navd61dj9jddhguefnquvlf3rqij2kaloj@4ax.com>,
>Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote:
>>On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:51:36 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>
|
|
|
hobbitfan111@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>Hi Susan. If you were standing on the subway platform in New York
>
> I'm
>
>>>sure you would have the right to talk about your religion to
>
> someone
>
>>>else, if you wanted to. In my opinion someone w
|
|
|
"Mike Flannigan" <mikef@flanniganelectric.com> wrote in message
news:JjA9e.91063$vL3.45283@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
>
> "Bill Walker" <bill.walker2@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:qIz9e.23805$jd6.14563@trnddc07...
> >
> > "Mike Flannigan" <m
|
|
|
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 01:32:53 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth
Breidbart) wrote:
>In article <gtsd61911hnfr32dnqfl5gfeck2t24s6c8@4ax.com>,
>Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote:
>>On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:47:07 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth
>>Bre
|
|
|
> >> I think you'd be subject to local laws requiring permits and
licenses
> >> for any business, plus you'd have to collect sales tax on each
book
> >> you sold (thus the license requirement). But that only applies if
> >> you're selling the book
|
|
|
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 00:25:38 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth
Breidbart) wrote:
>In article <977b61tcs29sl1ocs873mnmj80dl95dntn@4ax.com>,
>Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote:
>>On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 23:29:28 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth
>>Bre
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote
>"How about "The ability to conform behavior to the legal and ethical
requirements of the practice of law."
So.... it took you two *years* to come up with that ???
>"I suggest that it's not enough to KNOW, for instance, what abu
|
|
|
"Mike Flannigan" <mikef@flanniganelectric.com> wrote in message
news:33y9e.89007$vL3.49719@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
> "Bill Walker" <bill.walker2@verizon.net> wrote in message
> He's deliberately playing to fear and stupidity, and covertly impugn
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart wrote
>"Can you be more specific than "acting crazy"?
Yet, Ken's still 'mentally fit' to be an accountant and able to
represent clients in front of the IRS...... but somehow not 'mentally
fit' to be a lawyer.
Riiiiiiiiiiight.
|
|
|
"Mike Flannigan" <mikef@flanniganelectric.com> wrote in message
news:33y9e.89007$vL3.49719@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
>
> "Bill Walker" <bill.walker2@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:JQd9e.20635$Zn3.582@trnddc02...
> >
> > "Mike Flannigan" <mik
|
|
|
Ronnie DaFeo wrote:
> <stevejdufour@yahoo.com> wrote in message...
> > If I feel I have something to say and print it in a book do I have
the
> > right to sell the books in a public place? Or do I have to buy or
rent
> > a store? Or try to sell
|
|
|
stevejdufour@yahoo.com wrote:
> Susan Cohen wrote:
>
>><stevejdufour@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:1113969323.632572.185490@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>>zerove...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>Uh no. Since *your* livingroom is YOURS, no
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <42669712.8050404@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Larry wrote:
>>>In article <4266907C.4070503@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>>Larry wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In article <4265EE8F.1000805@it.com>, Ken Smi
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <426697FD.3050506@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Larry wrote:
>>>In article <42669032.3020802@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> What about this: "A lawyer shall not bring or defend a proce
|
|
|
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:51:36 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Larry wrote:
>> If you are legally entitled to sue him for "no reason at all" then what,
>> exactly, would your claim be?
>
> Libel. Don't be so obtuse, Lar -- I am under no
|
|
|
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:18:22 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> What about this: "A lawyer shall not bring or defend a proceeding, or
>assert or controvert an issue therein, unless there is a basis for doing
>so that is not frivolous, whic
|
|
|
In article <426697FD.3050506@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> Larry wrote:
> > In article <42669032.3020802@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> >
> >> What about this: "A lawyer shall not bring or defend a proceeding, or
> >>
|
|
|
In article <42669712.8050404@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> Larry wrote:
> > In article <4266907C.4070503@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> >>Larry wrote:
> >>>In article <4265EE8F.1000805@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wr
|
|
|
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:51:19 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth
Breidbart) wrote:
>In article <larry-5D4462.20102719042005@news1.east.earthlink.net>,
>Larry <larry@x.com> wrote:
>>The applicant has the burden of proof. If you want a driver's lic
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <42669032.3020802@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>
>> What about this: "A lawyer shall not bring or defend a proceeding, or
>>assert or controvert an issue therein, unless there is a basis for doing
>>so that
|
|
|
In article <larry-5D4462.20102719042005@news1.east.earthlink.net>,
Larry <larry@x.com> wrote:
>In article <d44525$ada$1@reader1.panix.com>,
> sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
>> In article <ik7a61hf5tarm2kba13e3k2q8a6107r79d@4ax.com>,
>> Jon
|
|
|
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:29:56 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth
Breidbart) wrote:
>In article <kk7b61p5b5mgbg9shnbgjbgktj56u5agur@4ax.com>,
>Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote:
>>On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 23:31:24 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth
>>Bre
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <42669116.8020405@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Larry wrote:
>>>In article <42668659.6030805@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>>Jon Beaver wrote:
>>>>>On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:53:42 GMT, Ken Smith <for
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <4266907C.4070503@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Larry wrote:
>>>In article <4265EE8F.1000805@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>>Larry wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>What does "good cause" mean to you, Ken?
>>>>
|
|
|
In article <hhvc61p5rudaulk7ud7puapbjph894ke7s@4ax.com>,
Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote:
>You had the burden of proving that you were mentally fit.
Every candidate supposedly has that burden. Yet essentially all other
candidates need do nothi
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:12:20 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
[snip]
>>>>>>>>>>What did the courts where he filed say about his use/abuse of the
>>>>>>>>>>legal process? If the courts say he abused it, that's one thing
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart wrote:
> In article <kk7b61p5b5mgbg9shnbgjbgktj56u5agur@4ax.com>,
> Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote:
>>On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 23:31:24 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth
>>Breidbart) wrote:
>
>
>>>Really? It looks to me like the r
|
|
|
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:47:07 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth
Breidbart) wrote:
>In article <hhvc61p5rudaulk7ud7puapbjph894ke7s@4ax.com>,
>Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote:
>
>>You had the burden of proving that you were mentally fit.
>
>Ever
|
|
|
When exercising the extended summer visitation, does the weeks of visitation
go from Sunday to Sunday?
Or, can they be any 7 day period? (ex. Tues. to Tues., Friday to Friday)
Thanks for any help or insight on the matter.
|
|
|
In article <42669032.3020802@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>
> What about this: "A lawyer shall not bring or defend a proceeding, or
> assert or controvert an issue therein, unless there is a basis for doing
> so that is not frivolou
|
|
|
In article <42669116.8020405@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> Larry wrote:
> > In article <42668659.6030805@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> >>Jon Beaver wrote:
> >>>On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:53:42 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> w
|
|
|
In article <4266907C.4070503@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> Larry wrote:
> > In article <4265EE8F.1000805@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> >>Larry wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>What does "good cause" mean to you, Ken?
> >>
> >>>Pleas
|
|
|
In article <kk7b61p5b5mgbg9shnbgjbgktj56u5agur@4ax.com>,
Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 23:31:24 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth
>Breidbart) wrote:
>>Really? It looks to me like the report says he abused the legal
>>pr
|
|
|
In article <2nmc615t4cmccu8n3i81svv2lb6q8oegp2@4ax.com>,
Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote:
>On 20 Apr 2005 00:46:59 -0700, "forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com>
>wrote:
>
>>You CLAIM Jeus lives. It might as well be Mithra or Attis or other
>>savior
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <42668659.6030805@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Jon Beaver wrote:
>>>On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:53:42 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>
>> [snipped; dealt with in other post]
>>
>>>>If you are going to s
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <4265EE8F.1000805@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Larry wrote:
>>>In article <4265A658.3010806@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>>Jon Beaver wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>It's not even (merely) an accusation. It'
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:54:33 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Larry wrote:
>>>In article <4265A658.3010806@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>>Please - no ad homenims, no personal attacks, no ran
|
|
|
"Bill Walker" <bill.walker2@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:qIz9e.23805$jd6.14563@trnddc07...
>
> "Mike Flannigan" <mikef@flanniganelectric.com> wrote in message
> news:33y9e.89007$vL3.49719@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
>>
>> "Bill Walker" <bill.
|
|
|
In article <42668659.6030805@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> Jon Beaver wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:53:42 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>
> [snipped; dealt with in other post]
>
> >>If you are going to spew about *my
|
|
|
In article <4265EE8F.1000805@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> Larry wrote:
> > In article <4265A658.3010806@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> >>Jon Beaver wrote:
> >>
> >>>It's not even (merely) an accusation. It's (merely) a
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:53:42 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
[snipped; dealt with in other post]
>>If you are going to spew about *my* case, come with applicable
>>caselaw.
>
> I don't need case law. YOU are the o
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:53:42 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
[snipped; where it matters, betwixt us]
>>>>>What does "good cause" mean to you, Ken?
>>>>
>>>>>Please - no ad homenims, no personal attacks, no rantsa abou
|
|
|
"Bill Walker" <bill.walker2@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:JQd9e.20635$Zn3.582@trnddc02...
>
> "Mike Flannigan" <mikef@flanniganelectric.com> wrote in message
> news:dVa9e.103963$vK6.76309@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
>>
>> "Sanders Kaufman" <un
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On 20 Apr 2005 00:46:59 -0700, "forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>>You CLAIM Jeus lives. It might as well be Mithra or Attis or other
>>savior mythical deities.
>>
>>We can prove Sagan and Clarke existed. We canno
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 05:47:23 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Jon Beaver wrote:
>>>On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 02:03:11 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>>Jon Beaver wrote:
>>>>>On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 00:43:00 GMT, Ken Smith <f
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <4265A658.3010806@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
[snip]
> Please - no ad homenims, no personal attacks, no rantsa about whether or
> not good cause exists in your case. Just a definition, as if you were
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 05:48:37 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Larry wrote:
>>>In article <4265A658.3010806@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>>Jon Beaver wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>It's not even (merely) an accusatio
|
|
|
<stevejdufour@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1113969323.632572.185490@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> zerove...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Uh no. Since *your* livingroom is YOURS, no one has any rights to
> use
>> it except you and those you gran
|
|
|
> > Hi Susan. If you were standing on the subway platform in New York
I'm
> > sure you would have the right to talk about your religion to
someone
> > else, if you wanted to. In my opinion someone would also have the
> > right to sell books ther
|
|
|
Jay,
The windows are a structural portion of the exterior walls. The Association
clearly has responsibility to correct defects in the structural integrity of
the exterior walls.
If the building caught fire, the Association would have to repair your
|
|
