Legal Spring Logo

"Reviewing every type of legal service"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Re: Jon Can Only Win If He Invents His Own Legal Issues (Re: The "debate" is over.
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 00:14:32 -0700, Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote: >On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 02:08:54 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> >wrote: > >>On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:37:43 -0700, Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote: > >>>Explain how you know


Re: Jon Can Only Win If He Invents His Own Legal Issues (Re: The "debate" is over.
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:27:17 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: >> On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:37:43 -0700, Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote: >>>On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 22:10:10 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> >>>wrote: >>>>On 25


Re: The Government is out of control
T-Storm wrote: > > Voice/Data/Image induction > > This form of electronic harassment causes an individual to think they > > are loosing their mind or that they have a mental illness. There are 3 > > known methods of imposing VDI induction. > > I


Re: Constellation Draco


Re: Fillibuster against People of Feith
"Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in message news:1oSdneB7_qhmJfPfRVn-jw@ez2.net... > "Sanders Kaufman" <unsentt@kaufman.net> wrote in message >> The broad picture is that the Bush Regime wants to put activist judges on >> the bench w


Re: The Government is out of control
> Voice/Data/Image induction > This form of electronic harassment causes an individual to think they > are loosing their mind or that they have a mental illness. There are 3 > known methods of imposing VDI induction. I've worked with component-level


Re: Fillibuster against People of Feith
"Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in message news:QJCdnfV26fO8MPPfRVn-oA@ez2.net... > "Sanders Kaufman" <unsentt@kaufman.net> wrote in message > I think it is best to step back from one event and look at the broader > picture. Even if


Re: Fillibuster against People of Feith
> "Sanders Kaufman" <unsentt@kaufman.net> wrote in message > news:tHybe.527$gd5.231@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com... > > The broad picture is that the Bush Regime wants to put activist judges on > > the bench who will rule AGAINST the standing law, and c


Re: Why are there no books critical of Scientology in mainstream bookstores?
"Bruce Mallory" <richman@poormen.org> wrote in message news:SYwbe.14608$An2.12872@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net... > > <stevejdufour@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:1114487750.639079.270400@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... >> >> . What is >


Silent-running "JAG" cashiered out by CBS
Silent-running "JAG" cashiered out by CBS http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/artsentertainment/2002252734_jagfinale26.html {EXCERPT} Seattle Times, WA - 10 hours ago, By Ed Bark. Discharged by NBC and then re-drafted by CBS, "JAG" easily ranks as


Military recruiting measure up for vote by county board
Military recruiting measure up for vote by county board http://www.insidebayarea.com/trivalleyherald/localnews/ci_2684966 {EXCERPT} Tri-Valley Herald, CA - 8 hours ago HAYWARD A resolution urging school districts countywide to inform parents of thei


Re: Why are there no books critical of Scientology in mainstream bookstores?
<stevejdufour@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1114487750.639079.270400@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... > > . What is > > there to critisize, really? > > They wrecked Tom Cruise's acting career. > Is this the worst thing you can tell about Sci


Re: Fillibuster against People of Feith
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:qeidnQLyLtPK8fPfRVn-uQ@ez2.net... > You are full of #@($. > > Everybody wants judges to rule according to the law, and there is no > evidence that these judges have not ruled thusly. Ever


Re: Why are there no books critical of Scientology in mainstream bookstores?
> Can you tell how many people have ever been killed in the name of > Scientology. Now compare it to the number of people killed in the name of > Christianity, in the name of Islam. There's a list of 30 or so people who have been murdered "in the


Re: Fillibuster against People of Feith
"Sanders Kaufman" <unsentt@kaufman.net> wrote in message news:tHybe.527$gd5.231@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com... > The broad picture There's no reason to drag Clinton into this.


Re: The "debate" is over.
Jon Beaver wrote: > On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:26:59 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >>Jon Beaver wrote: > > >>>>>> You're just missing the difference >>>>>>between a "hearing" and a "trial" You're just confusing "hearing" and >>>>>>"opportuni


Re: Fillibuster against People of Feith
"Sanders Kaufman" <usenet@kaufman.net> wrote in message news:URebe.701$m85.319@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com... > Keeping > the Republicans > will represent > ALL Americans's interests Not all the Democrats are bad.


Re: Fillibuster against People of Feith
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:qeidnQLyLtPK8fPfRVn-uQ@ez2.net... > You are full of #@($ > "Sanders Kaufman" He must be a Democrat.


Re: Fillibuster against People of Feith
"Sanders Kaufman" <usenet@kaufman.net> wrote in message news:Snjbe.738$m85.501@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com... > So, it's perfectly legal (and moral) to oppose the > Democrats in Congress Or anywhere else, for that matter.


Re: Fillibuster against People of Feith
"Sanders Kaufman" <usenet@kaufman.net> wrote in message news:djebe.342$461.224@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com... > > The Dems > Insane or evil - they're bad men with evil aims. Especially when driving on a Massachusettes bridge while listening to Ba


Re: Fillibuster against People of Feith
"Sanders Kaufman" <usenet@kaufman.net> wrote in message news:cjebe.341$461.227@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com... > That's exactly what > the Democrats are > evil Oh, I wouldn't call *all* of them evil- some of them are just misguided. If Darth V


Re: Why are there no books critical of Scientology in mainstream bookstores?
Because nobody cares?


Re: Fillibuster against People of Feith
"Scott Hedrick" <dinehnm@yahoo.net> wrote in message news:gRwbe.102599$f%4.85317@bignews1.bellsouth.net... > > "Sanders Kaufman" <usenet@kaufman.net> wrote in message > news:cjebe.341$461.227@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com... > > That's exactly what >


Re: Fillibuster against People of Feith
"Sanders Kaufman" <unsentt@kaufman.net> wrote in message news:tHybe.527$gd5.231@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com... > "Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in message > news:QJCdnfV26fO8MPPfRVn-oA@ez2.net... > > "Sanders Kaufman" <unsentt@kaufma


Re: Fillibuster against People of Feith
"Sanders Kaufman" <unsentt@kaufman.net> wrote in message news:ivwbe.827$m85.566@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com... > "Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:qeidnQLyLtPK8fPfRVn-uQ@ez2.net... > > You are full of #@($. > > > > Everybo


Re: Firearms Coalition: [Fcalerts-list] Gun Rights Alert - Supreme Court Watch...
I agree with almost everything you wrote. The one disagreement I have is the domestic violence part. I don't know all the numbers, but a large proportion of murders is related to domestic disputes. If someone is convicted of domestic violence we sho


Re: Why are there no books critical of Scientology in mainstream bookstores?
I wonder if "Frauds and Fallacies" is still in print? In it, they did a brilliant, first-hand report about how the whole business of "clears" is a total fraud & flop. Susan


Re: Jon Can Only Win If He Invents His Own Legal Issues (Re: The "debate" is over.
Kent Wills wrote: > On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:37:43 -0700, Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote: >>On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 22:10:10 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> >>wrote: >>>On 25 Apr 2005 12:28:11 -0700, asclero@zdnetonebox.com wrote: >>> >>>> An argu


Re: The "debate" is over.
Jon Beaver wrote: > On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 01:56:40 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >>Ken Smith wrote: >>>Jon Beaver wrote: >>>>On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 21:54:28 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Ken didn't get a hea


President Tarja Halonen's Legal State is A Common Joke
Title: President Tarja Halonen's Legal State is A Common Joke Abstract: You read yourself how Socialist Finland takes care of Official Legal Proceeding; No identification necessary, how socialist government judges list people, how Court Judges com


Re: Fillibuster against People of Feith
You are full of #@($. Everybody wants judges to rule according to the law, and there is no evidence that these judges have not ruled thusly. They probably do rule in a manner that you do not like, but that in itself does not make them unqualifie


Re: The "debate" is over.
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:26:59 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >Jon Beaver wrote: >>>> > You're just missing the difference >>>>>between a "hearing" and a "trial" You're just confusing "hearing" and >>>>>"opportunity to be heard." >>>> >>>


Re: Why are there no books critical of Scientology in mainstream bookstores?
stevejdufour@yahoo.com wrote: > . What is > >>there to critisize, really? > > > They wrecked Tom Cruise's acting career. > And that's a bad thing? Martin Holterman


Re: L Albert denying Hitlers great economy
Look, dude. Just cause Hitler is your HERO, don't mean anybody else agrees with you! bd4u LIBERATOR wrote: > > Sure, I can eliminate poverty and unemployment if I put > > everyone either in the armed services, or in an industry > > that supports


Re: Fillibuster against People of Feith
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:wPGdnRAxUMPJBvDfRVn-3g@ez2.net... > "Sanders Kaufman" <usenet@kaufman.net> wrote in message >> It's not a religious test - it's a moral one. >> It's not illegal to vote against NeoChristians


Re: Jon Can Only Win If He Invents His Own Legal Issues (Re: The "debate" is over.
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 23:01:53 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >Jon Beaver wrote: >> On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 22:10:10 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>On 25 Apr 2005 12:28:11 -0700, asclero@zdnetonebox.com wrote: >>> >>> >>>> An


Re: Jon Can Only Win If He Invents His Own Legal Issues (Re: The "debate" is over.
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:37:43 -0700, Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote: >On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 22:10:10 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> >wrote: > >>On 25 Apr 2005 12:28:11 -0700, asclero@zdnetonebox.com wrote: >> >>> An argument persuasive to w


Re: The "debate" is over.
Ken Smith wrote: > Jon Beaver wrote: > >> On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 21:54:28 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Ken didn't get a hearing. Again, I've known him for 10 years >>> (give or take a few months) and can tell you that he


Re: The "debate" is over.
Jon Beaver wrote: > On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 21:54:28 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Ken didn't get a hearing. Again, I've known him for 10 years >>(give or take a few months) and can tell you that he's never lied. > > He's not


L Albert denying Hitlers great economy
> Sure, I can eliminate poverty and unemployment if I put > everyone either in the armed services, or in an industry > that supports it. Try another track, your train has run > out of steam a long time ago. ahhh, it's a Jew or a Jew supporter - L Al


Re: Jon Can Only Win If He Invents His Own Legal Issues (Re: The "debate" is over.
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 02:08:54 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:37:43 -0700, Jon Beaver <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote: >>Explain how you know that Ken was "punished" for "exercising his First >>Amendment rights." Before


Re: The "debate" is over.
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 01:56:40 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: >> Jon Beaver wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 21:54:28 GMT, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Ken didn't get a hearing. Again, I've kno


Continued...



Subdirectories


site map |  disclaimer |  privacy
All Rights Reserved, Legal Spring, Inc. 2004