alt.lawyers

Big Business Rules!!! Private developers, hotel chains, condominium developers, Walmart can now seize your property and develop on it thanks to today's Supreme court ruling. In essence the government now owns all property in America and we are merel

On 23-Jun-2005, "BBB" <hotel@jay.com> wrote: > Try doing some browsing through the Florida state statutes at > > http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?Mode=View%20Statutes&Submenu=1&Tab=statutes > > Here is one relevant provision > > 790.

On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:29:55 -0400, in a place far, far away, "Scott Hedrick" <dinehnm@yahoo.net> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: >> Good, then let's get them legal representation, take them to trial, and >> i

Doom & Gloomer, spartakus@my-deja.com whined: >Dismal wrote: > >> Doom & Gloomer, "Tommy Kendricks" <tken@socal.rr.com> whined: >> >> >I love how you fascists call them terrorists, but you don't have >> >any evidence to charge them with anything.

In article <larry-AC68BB.20473723062005@news1.east.earthlink.net>, Larry <larry@x.com> wrote: > In article <btr1702-2F4139.20335123062005@news.giganews.com>, > BTR1701 <btr1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > In article <AvydnUQwnObyiSbfRVn-2Q@ez2.n

"Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in message news:K_OdnRFlbKJlYyffRVn-jQ@ez2.net... > > "McGyver" <Greyprof@msn.com> wrote in message > news:%jAue.2324$HU.1154@trnddc03... >> Jeff: >> You are missing a point. It's true that if the

Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote: > dance for us, kook " :-D " > > In article <Xns967E7D67BF26castleamber@130.133.1.4>, > "John Bokma," the google censorship kook, wrote: <http://www.answers.com/projection> " 8 Psychology. a. The a

In article <larry-42F26C.19014822062005@news1.east.earthlink.net>, Larry <larry@x.com> wrote: > In article <btr1702-48EB5D.18530022062005@news.giganews.com>, > BTR1701 <btr1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > In article <larry-06F67F.02301322062005@

In article <FeDue.73292$6g3.46517@tornado.texas.rr.com>, "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote: > "BTR1701" <btr1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message > news:btr1702-48EB5D.18530022062005@news.giganews.com... > > In article <larry-06F67F.02301322062005@ne

In article <AvydnUQwnObyiSbfRVn-2Q@ez2.net>, "Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote: > "BTR1701" <btr1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message > news:btr1702-48EB5D.18530022062005@news.giganews.com... > > > > Doesn't matter. There's no law, fe

>If your wife was due a 1099 for 2004, she should have received it by >mid-February. IRS (?) rules say that the 1099 has to be mailed no later than >January 31. Perhaps the rule is that it must be prepared by Jan 31, but I am >pretty certain it has to

<ihaveenoughspamasitis@nospam.com> wrote in message news:ZqHue.584$Bm.407@bignews5.bellsouth.net... > On 23-Jun-2005, "BBB" <hotel@jay.com> wrote: > >> Try doing some browsing through the Florida state statutes at >> >> http://www.leg.state.fl.us

"BTR1701" <btr1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:btr1702-48EB5D.18530022062005@news.giganews.com... > In article <larry-06F67F.02301322062005@news1.east.earthlink.net>, > Larry <larry@x.com> wrote: > >> In article <btr1702-6BDDDA.0031432206

Greetings, I have a question for anyone intimately familiar with antitrust law, specifically the Robinson-Patman Act..... Relating to price discrimination, is it considered discriminatory under Robinson-Patman to offer an exclusive, mail-in rebate

dance for us, kook " :-D " --- In article <Xns967E7D67BF26castleamber@130.133.1.4>, "John Bokma," the google censorship kook, wrote:

On 23 Jun 2005 15:40:32 GMT, in <ibklb1hffq3iv6r60eku7au8f4k4j7cict@4ax.com>, Beaver Cleaver <beaver_cleaver@mayfield01net> wrote: SCOTT BRADBURY SAYS: "I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and the bulk of my posts prove so! Yo

"Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in message news:X-SdnWOsxrVGyiHfRVn-jg@ez2.net... > > "Guardenman" <m.frisch@charter.net> wrote in message > news:pHPue.3909$B_3.2545@fe05.lga... >> >> "Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrot

n Thu, 23 Jun 2005 06:43:51 -0600, <catamont-D198F6.06435123062005@news.giganews.com> Sara Salzman <catamont@concentric.net> wrote: >In article <11blapbgolug8df@corp.supernews.com>, > kmcvay@shell.vex.net (Kenneth McVay OBC) wrote: > >> In article

"Pat Flannery" <flanner@daktel.com> wrote in message news:11bkrv4gmuju4f4@corp.supernews.com... > > > John Crichton wrote: > > > The Geneva Convention does not apply to the captives at Gitmo because > > they are terrorist (i.e. unlawful combatant

"Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in message news:FKudnbVDOOUHDyTfRVn-qQ@ez2.net... > > "ElJay" <LJ@LJLJLJ.LJL> wrote in message > news:zMWdneqGt_OwfiXfRVn-rA@comcast.com... >> "Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in message

When you get your driver license, you give consent to blood alcohol level tests on demand while you are operating your motor vehicle. Your refusal to give the required sample, you are allowed to choose between a breath test, a blood test, or a urine te

"BTR1701" <btr1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:btr1702-48EB5D.18530022062005@news.giganews.com... > > Doesn't matter. There's no law, federal or state, that requires you to > engage in a conversation with a police officer whenever he/she de

"Gordon Burditt" <gordonb.ko4fe@burditt.org> wrote in message news:11bm24l8dmc016e@corp.supernews.com... > >If your wife was due a 1099 for 2004, she should have received it by > >mid-February. IRS (?) rules say that the 1099 has to be mailed no late

Thank you McGyver for the insight - I find it very useful. I found out that my wife's boss (Mr. V) had told her she would be a 1099 contractor. He also told her that there would be 30 day delay (or some term like that with the words 30 day in it) f

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050623/ap_on_go_su_co/scotus_seizing_property_14;_ylt=Amks.xUsO3tFTZu3B3mAc2huCM0A;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl Supreme Court Rules Cities May Seize Homes By HOPE YEN, Associated Press Writer 1 hour, 34 minutes a

"CF" <cf@aol.com> wrote in message news:42BADDA4.8030007@aol.com... > Thank you McGyver for the insight - I find it very useful. > > I found out that my wife's boss (Mr. V) had told her she would be a 1099 > contractor. He also told her that there w

"McGyver" <Greyprof@msn.com> wrote in message news:%jAue.2324$HU.1154@trnddc03... > Jeff: > You are missing a point. It's true that if the employer and worker are > obeying the law, an employee receives a W-2 and an independent contractor > receiv

>I was 39 when I started law school. But what age did you get your 4 yr degree? And what was it in?

Try doing some browsing through the Florida state statutes at http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?Mode=View%20Statutes&Submenu=1&Tab=statutes Here is one relevant provision 790.08 Taking possession of weapons and arms; reports; dispo

I was 39 when I started law school. <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:dbmjb1l5im1817plf9or17565hbmo5lpgv@4ax.com... > >I am 42 and just completed my degree in English in May. I will be > >attending >>law school in the fall. > > Fantastic

Nomen Nescio <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote: > (NOTE: to date NINE of my mirrored websites are STILL up & running) Which means that by now 11 have been deleted. Thank you Geocities/Yahoo! for deleting number 11 :-D. >min.pl gone: da

----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- IT JUST KEEPS getting better! For example, check out these clever designs on the URLs listed here: http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingstuff/290222 http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingstuff/256239 http://www.c

"Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in message news:P76dnQrIx6KXiCbfRVn-sw@ez2.net... > When you get your driver license, you give consent to blood alcohol level > tests on demand while you are operating your motor vehicle. Your refusal

"BTR1701" <btr1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:btr1702-71F7E3.20362723062005@news.giganews.com... > In article <FeDue.73292$6g3.46517@tornado.texas.rr.com>, > "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote: > >> "BTR1701" <btr1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote i

In article <ee965b2d44b0187859480b3ce876179e@dizum.com> Nomen Nescio <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote: > > -----BEGIN The Collected Buffoonery of Daniel Joseph Min - Usenet's most failed prophet. ---------------------------------------

John Crichton wrote: > The Geneva Convention does not apply to the captives at Gitmo because > they are terrorist (i.e. unlawful combatants), not because there is no > formal declaration of war. Good, then let's get them legal representati

Actually Pat, you are wrong. To fall under the purview of the Geneva Convention an enemy combatant has to observe certain rules. They must wear an identifiable uniform, they must not attempt to hide among civilian populations, they must not intent