|
|
"Kim" <72flhtakethisout@twcny.rr.com> wrote in message
news:11bqn32dmmisv59@corp.supernews.com...
> While we were living in Vermont we bought a house in New York (less than
> an hour away). We subsequently decided to remodel the home before we moved
|
|
|
Mike,
I hate to say it, but this sounds like a job for the BATFE. After all we
are talking about a "Stolen" firearm are we not? Since the local police are
part of the problem the next logical step would be either the your County
Attorney, State
|
|
|
my family can wait a few extra minutes while I shoot the @$#*ing pig.
SAVE AMERICA, KILL A COP TODAY
KILL PIGS
|
|
|
just pee on the cop, and after you get done doing that, then shoot the
@$#*ing idiot.
KILL PIGS
|
|
|
it's not normal behavior to go to that
> extreme unless you've been accused of a crime.
The fact that you are missing is, YOU ARE BEING ACCUSED OF A CRIME DURING A
CHECKPOINT STOP, AND IN ORDER TO CONTINUE ON YOUR WAY, YOU HAVE TO PROVE
YOU'RE
|
|
|
>> It's interesting that merely asserting the rights guaranteed you by law
>> is now considered "starting a fight" with the cops.
>
> And what really is wrong is that they get away with it because they have
> the
> brute force of the entire legal
|
|
|
>
> That is some really bad advice. First off most police officers are
> exempted from civil liability in that situation. The whole law suit lotto
> theory gets lots of people in trouble. If you go into an encounter with
> the police, thinking you'
|
|
|
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 16:56:32 -0000, in a place far, far away,
gherbert@retro.com (George William Herbert) made the phosphor on my
monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:
>Rand Simberg <simberg.interglobal@org.trash> wrote:
>>>We have rules t
|
|
|
> From: gherbert@retro.com (George William Herbert)
>Rand Simberg <simberg.interglobal@org.trash> wrote:
>>>We have rules that are not being followed. Some example of
>>>democracy we are.
>>
>>All rules are being followed, per precedent.
>
>N
|
|
|
Hop David wrote:
>
> "the left"?
>
> What I regard as the left is a diverse group of people.
"I belong to no organized political party- I am a Democrat." -Will
Rogers :-)
Pat
|
|
|
Rand Simberg <simberg.interglobal@org.trash> wrote:
>>We have rules that are not being followed. Some example of
>>democracy we are.
>
>All rules are being followed, per precedent.
No they aren't. We haven't had them tried in a
military tribunal
|
|
|
<me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:7isqb1db8dfdqkmivbm7k7dk5dts3bvqem@4ax.com...
>>> <me@privacy.net> wrote...
>>>>> I was 39 when I started law school.
>>
>> I was 45.
>>
>>>> [At] what age did you get your 4 yr degree?
>>
>> 22.
>
|
|
|
Dismal wrote:
> spartakus@my-deja.com whined:
> >Dismal wrote:
> >> spartakus@my-deja.com whined:
> >> >Liar. Most of them are ordinary people who were sold to the Americans
> >> >by Afghan warlords for bounties. Some of them are children. And
|
|
|
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:30:08 -0400, "Kim"
<72flhtakethisout@twcny.rr.com> wrote:
>While we were living in Vermont we bought a house in New York (less than an
>hour away). We subsequently decided to remodel the home before we moved in,
>and hired a
|
|
|
IBen/JYoung/loose cannon wrote:
> spartakus@my-deja.com wrote:
> > The burden of proof is on the U.S. to show that these detainees are
> > indeed terrorists. That requires things called "evidence" and "due
> > process". The detainees have received
|
|
|
Rand Simberg wrote:
>>Just wait. We start that, and the screams of
>>"extrajudicial execution!" will rise up from the left...
>
>
> Careful. Hop David will call you a liar because you didn't say "some
> of the left."
"the left"?
What
|
|
|
<ihaveenoughspamasitis@nospam.com> wrote
> They were REALLY bad news. That's why I'm reluctant to stir up a hornet's
> nest.
Yeah; look what they did to you when they didn't know you- think of what
unlimited powers they wield, and how unscrupulousl
|
|
|
again, calling someone who offers FACTUAL EVIDENCE a paranoid freak is just
proof of your own complacent ignorant attitude. Read the page jerkoff, the
information effects even small minded fools like yourself, regardless of the
group you jerk off to
|
|
|
>Have you looked into getting credits for any kind of work you've already
>done? Sometimes colleges will allow you to test out of a course and get
>credit for it.
No I haven't done that
I've mainly worked in factories tho. So don't really
thin
|
|
|
>Any undergrad degree.
yep.... I'm finding that out
It really amazes me tho... I would have thought it
impossible to become a lawyer with say a mech
engineering degree.... or psychology degree
I was ignorant abt it tho
I'm clear now! Thanks
|
|
|
>> <me@privacy.net> wrote...
>>>> I was 39 when I started law school.
>
> I was 45.
>
>>> [At] what age did you get your 4 yr degree?
>
> 22.
>
>>> And what was it in?
>
> Economics.
>
Thanks
That info kind of helps assure me I
|
|
|
spartakus@my-deja.com wrote:
> The burden of proof is on the U.S. to show that these detainees are
> indeed terrorists. That requires things called "evidence" and "due
> process". The detainees have received neither. But Nazis accused of
>
|
|
|
While we were living in Vermont we bought a house in New York (less than an
hour away). We subsequently decided to remodel the home before we moved in,
and hired a contractor to accomplish this.
We have a written estimate/contract outlining the wor
|
|
|
"Mark2101" <Markss2101@cox.net> wrote in message
news:JF1ve.7990$go.2684@fed1read05...
>
> "BTR1701" <btr1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
> news:btr1702-112F1B.18100624062005@news.giganews.com...
>> In article <NEPue.3907$B_3.2516@fe05.lga>,
|
|
|
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 03:25:24 GMT, Dolores~ <prosey@spamblows.gmail.com> wrote:
>
> "CF" <cf@aol.com> wrote in message news:42BADDA4.8030007@aol.com...
>> Thank you McGyver for the insight - I find it very useful.
>>
>> I found out that my wife's bos
|
|
|
Maybe you should take a look at the name of the newsgroup, you paranoid
freak.
"winagain" <yanks@steinbrenner.com> wrote in message
news:xp6dndVwTr7fQCHfRVn-vg@adelphia.com...
> Maybe you should read the page asswipe. your ignorance is the only th
|
|
|
In article <uuvob1pdfo9ggmnn1beqbkq016j6rch5ns@4ax.com>,
Reunite Gondwanaland (Mary Shafer) <reunite.gondwana@gmail.com> wrote:
>> ...Could Britain still make the claim that we are not an independent
>> nation but a colony of Britain in the hands of r
|
|
|
"jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote in message
news:5m6ve.84519$PR6.71602@tornado.texas.rr.com...
>
> "Mark2101" <Markss2101@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:JF1ve.7990$go.2684@fed1read05...
> >
> > "BTR1701" <btr1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
|
|
|
Any undergrad degree.
<me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:5adhb15tquipg3nojkfmb9o5s8aibvfo87@4ax.com...
> I'm 47 and back in college at late life. Only part time
> for now.... 6 hrs per semester
>
> I'm working on a 4 year degree and have a LON
|
|