|
|
In article <i2iye.11624$Si3.8293@fe06.lga>,
"George" <renne26@charter.net> wrote:
> "BTR1701" <btr1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
> news:btr1702-8B3DEB.19133321062005@news.giganews.com...
> > In article <larry-79F85C.08190221062005@news1.east
|
|
|
In article <42C93F48.2040704@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> dhm@best.com wrote:
> > On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, Ken Smith wrote:
> >
> >> It's not a public ceremony -- they don't have to let you in.
> >
> > It is a public event. The court
|
|
|
Nomen Nescio wrote:
> >How do you view the prelaunch situation at this point?
> >
> >Challenger's Ghost
>
> The odds of success are exactly 50-50. The vehicle will either explode or
> it will not. 50-50, by mathematical definition. Its exact.
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> dhm@best.com wrote:
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>> dhm@best.com wrote:
>>>> After the bar exam is over, do the successful applicants attend an
>>>> ordination ritual in the state Supreme Court courtroom where they are
>>>> given thei
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> dhm@best.com wrote:
>> After the bar exam is over, do the successful applicants attend an
>> ordination ritual in the state Supreme Court courtroom where they are
>> given their printed license certificates?
>> Maybe Ken coul
|
|
|
And the German Chancellor also told us that under no circumstances would his
government go along with action against Iraq. "Oil-for-food" is a now-clear
explamation. Too much money involved. But as Clintonistas used to say, its
about time to move
|
|
|
Wyoming & Texas have mandatory I-D statutes, requiring a citizen to give
some info, including name, under some circumstances. In Texas, ignoring the
cop's demand to stand & deliver (submit to detention) is a "B" misdemeanor.
Can't say about other s
|
|
|
If them Jew-boys are so all-fired bright, why don't the Moslems just hire
the Jews to run Moslem countries? Seems to me that things would get better
all around for the Moslems.
"z" <gzuckier@snail-mail.net> wrote in message
news:1112901968.277374.
|
|
|
dhm@best.com wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> It's not a public ceremony -- they don't have to let you in.
>
> It is a public event. The court is supposed to be a public institution.
> (And then you come along and chastize the
|
|
|
>From what I've read about Lockheed's main (external) propellant tank
mods, they are significant enough to warrant a Wet Countdown
Demonstration Test (WCDT) and a Flight Readiness Firing (FRF).
Lockheed and NASA launched Challenger (Mission 51-L) wit
|
|
|
Russia/China ally against JINSA/PNAC Neocon agenda:
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=37347
|
|
