|
|
Van wrote:
>
> http://www-pao.ksc.nasa.gov/kscpao/images/large/05pp1774.jpg
Compare with: <www.mission51l.com/black.JPG>.
It looks like *violet* vs. *black* to me, unless I've gone color blind.
The large, cylindrically rectangular piece of debr
|
|
|
Steve wrote:
<snip>
> you'll notice there is a BLACK
> cover serving as the intertank access arm cover.
First, if you want me to "notice" something, you'll have to provide a
link to a reasonable reference -- as a minimum.
Second, I'm not tal
|
|
|
Van wrote:
>http://www-pao.ksc.nasa.gov/kscpao/images/large/05pp1774.jpg
>
>
That poor bird...I sure hope it wasn't an albatross. ;-)
Pat
|
|
|
Rick Nelson;
> Manned Space Missions = Militarization of Space.
That's more right than you and I'd care to think.
The ultimate high ground will soon become the LSE-CM/ISS, along with
it's tether diople element hosting a termination pod of a dozen
|
|
|
> ghost@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > Next consider STS-114, the current mission. No rectangular
> > intertank-access cover appears to be missing here:
<snip>
> > <www.mission51l.com/114L.JPG>
Van wrote:
> http://www-pao.ksc.nasa.gov/kscpao/im
|
|
|
ghost@gmail.com wrote:
> First, consider Mission 51-L, in 1986. No rectangular intertank-access
> cover appears to be missing here:
>
> <http://history.nasa.gov/rogersrep/v3n27.htm>.
>
> Similarly, no rectangular intertank-access cover appears to be
|
|
|
NASA isn't touching it because there isn't a problem. If you look at
any of the pre-liftoff photos and videos of rollout and the launch
replays showing the back of the tank, you'll notice there is a BLACK
cover serving as the intertank access arm cover
|
|
|
Yale F. Edeiken = DISCIPLINED and INACTIVE Pathological Liar:
Yale F. Edeiken had already received one "Private Reprimand" in 1993 and had
received an "Informal Admonition" in 1995 and then received "PUBLIC CENSURE" in
1998 and then he claimed this a
|
|
