|
|
Ken,
If you believe that pre-screening "is not incompatible with a functioning
democracy" you really are beyond hope, and you really should not discuss
your point with any member of racial minority group. You clearly do not
have the capacity to
|
|
|
Noel,
I didn't realize you meant THAT Richard Perle's opinion. That makes all the
difference in the world.
You see, I have this cousin named Bubba who lives over in the Pass, and he
has this friend named Richard Perle. He's my cousin and all (
|
|
|
Why Are the Media Having Such a Hard Time Covering Cindy Sheehan?:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/why-are-the-media-having-_b_5884.html
|
|
|
Why Are the Media Having Such a Hard Time Covering Cindy Sheehan?:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/why-are-the-media-having-_b_5884.html
|
|
|
James Drouin wrote:
> Ken,
>
> That's your response, that it really is acceptable to pre-screen
> participants in the democratic process,
I'm not saying that it is particularly desirable, but then again, it
is not incompatible with a functio
|
|
|
Ken,
That's your response, that it really is acceptable to pre-screen
participants in the democratic process, tossed in with some unimaginative
insults, followed with what has to be one of the most convenient memory
lapses I've witnessed in quite
|
|
|
In article "Truthseeker" wrote:
>Cindy Sheehan denied writing that her son died for Israel:
>http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2005/08/cindy-sheehan-mother-of-spc-cas
>ey.html
http://www.strangecosmos.com/content/item/103727.html
http://ww
|
|
|
James Drouin wrote:
> As far a calling you names, we were brought up that it wasn't really polite
> to do that.
Methinks the Human Insult Machine protesteth too much.
|
|
|
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 01:44:05 GMT, "James Drouin"
<jdrouin@houston.rr.com> wrote:
>Noel,
>
>I guess I am missing something. In the second set of circumstances you
>listed where:
>
>"- action authorised by the Security Council as a collective res
|
|
|
James Drouin wrote:
> Ken,
>
> And for our entertainment tonight,
>
> So you actually believe that a political process that pre-screens
> participants based on their acceptance of the religious ideology of a select
> few qualifies as a democrac
|
|
|
Cindy Sheehan denied writing that her son died for Israel:
http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2005/08/cindy-sheehan-mother-of-spc-casey.html
|
|
|
As some of you are aware I had a head on collision with a very large moose
recently. My vehicle sustained $17,000 damage. The total new price of the
vehicle was 30,000.
Here is my story...
I have what's called in Canada "New value replacement
|
|
|
Rico,
That's your comeback? That's it?
You use a logic set that would have had the women I went to school with
urinating on themselves with laughter and you come back with "<*Plonk!*>"
If you really work for Microsoft, now I know why there are
|
|
|
Noel,
I guess I am missing something. In the second set of circumstances you
listed where:
"- action authorised by the Security Council as a collective response to a
threat to the peace, breach of the peace or act of aggression."
Didn't Para
|
|
|
Ken,
And for our entertainment tonight,
So you actually believe that a political process that pre-screens
participants based on their acceptance of the religious ideology of a select
few qualifies as a democracy? Wow, I guess I could become the
|
|
|
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 06:16:53 -0400 (EDT), "-" <--no-spam@.invalid>
wrote:
>Hi - Hi! We're your Weather Girls - Ah-huh -
>And have we got news for you - You better listen!
>Get ready, all you lonely girls
>and leave those umbrellas at home. - Alrigh
|
|
