|
|
The law -- and certainly contract law -- has little to do with
"fairness". This will not help your argument.
Not all risks can be insured against, at least not at reasonable cost.
I know of no way to insure (with normal auto insurance) against the
l
|
|
|
I have started an Ontario Law Clerks group at
http://groups.google.ca/group/ontariolawclerks if any one wants to
contribute, please feel free.
|
|
|
Ken,
And that snappy little comeback is what? Your imitation of Shakespeare?
How often do you look at your image in the mirror?
James
"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:4305E40B.2080109@it.com...
> James Drouin wrote:
>
>> A
|
|
|
Ken,
I am not going to be able to go on with your education without charging you
for it. Let me start with simple words and simple concepts that even you
should be able to understand:
Prior to 1776, nobody could vote. Under that situation, 0%
|
|
|
What's the cost of a used car just like yours? Maybe you could bargain
to junk yours and by a used one?
BTW, you hit on the weakness of all auto insurance: you are not, in
general, entitled to a new car nor to reimbursement for the loss in
value by
|
|
|
James Drouin wrote:
> Ken,
[customary juvenile insult deleted]
> Pre-screening is "discrimination". Perhaps you have heard of that word
> (though apparently not).
Less than a century ago, we only allowed those with a penis to vote
--
|
|
|
On 20-Aug-2005, "James Drouin" <jdrouin@houston.rr.com> wrote:
> And factually, we (our forefathers that is), did NOT disenfranchise anyone.
You do realize that some of "our forefathers" had slaves. Jefferson for one.
|
|
|
Ken,
As I stated before, look to suing the school systems you came through and
your parents for letting it happen.
Pre-screening is "discrimination". Perhaps you have heard of that word
(though apparently not). For your reference - an entire c
|
|
|
Being a public scribe is never UPL.
Giving gratis advice with no remuneration even for out-of-pocket costs
has proved difficult, but perhaps not impossible -- I just haven't
found a case -- to prosecute. There is a specific allowance for free
advice
|
|
|
James Drouin wrote:
> Ken,
>
> If you believe that pre-screening "is not incompatible with a functioning
> democracy" you really are beyond hope, and you really should not discuss
> your point with any member of racial minority group. You clearly
|
|
|
S: White House Searches for Balance in Drug Fight
URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v05/n1350/a02.html
Newshawk: Please Write a LTE today! www.mapinc.org/resource/#guides
Votes: 2
Pubdate: Fri, 19 Aug 2005
Source: New York Times (NY)
Copyright:
|
|
|
US WA: Where There's Smoke
URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v05/n1352/a02.html
Newshawk: Herb
Votes: 0
Pubdate: Thu, 18 Aug 2005
Source: Stranger, The (Seattle, WA)
Copyright: 2005 The Stranger
Contact: postmaster@thestranger.com
Website: ht
|
|
|
US: Web: Drug War Harms More Than It Helps
URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v05/n1353/a10.html
Newshawk: DSW - The Original On-Line Drug Policy Weekly
Votes: 1
Webpage: http://www.drugsense.org/dsw/2005/ds05.n413.html#sec6
Pubdate: Fri, 19 Aug
|
|
