|
|
In article <1129818430.065136.15300@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"Bob" <Sherins@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Thanks for the give and take, but, to me, your perspective is
> appalling. Here I am an unpretentious non-lawyer who just happens to
> have s
|
|
|
The House of Representatives today passed the Protection of Lawful
Commerce in Arms Act with amendments added by the Senate to require
trigger locks be sold with all guns sold by dealers (current law
requires trigger locks be sold only with new guns).
|
|
|
"karragmile" <squadfifteen@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1129809016.783179.133970@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> I'm writing a novel and hoping someone can help. How would a person
> hire a lawyer to deal with buying a bankrupt company in the
|
|
|
Historic Victory For NRA
U.S. House Of Representatives Passes
The "Protection Of Lawful Commerce In Arms Act"
(Fairfax, VA) - Today the United States House of Representatives passed the
"Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act" (S. 397) by a bipar
|
|
|
US: Law Officers Calling For End To 'War Against Drugs'
URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v05.n1643.a05.html
Newshawk: End Marijuana Prohibition http://www.mpp.org
Votes: 0
Pubdate: Mon, 17 Oct 2005
Source: Knoxville News-Sentinel (TN)
Copyrigh
|
|
|
hile gun control passes in the House, GOA expresses a big THANK YOU
to all of its members and activists who waged a lone battle of
opposition
-- And you can be encouraged that your calls made a HUGE difference
in one area
Gun Owners of America E-Ma
|
|
|
Vote in Poll on Passage of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act
America Online (AOL) is conducting a poll asking if respondents support or
oppose passage of S.397, the Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. S.397 passed in
the U.S. House of Representatives this morning
|
|
|
NEWS RELEASE
Citizens Committee for the
Right to Keep and Bear Arms
12500 N.E. Tenth Place
Bellevue, WA 98005
CCRKBA APPLAUDS HOUSE PASSAGE OF GUN INDUSTRY PROTECTION/TORT REFORM BILL
For Immediate Release: October 20, 2005
BELLEVUE, WA
|
|
|
Jesus @$#*ing Christ, if I'm reading this correctly, the "OUTRAGEOUS
POSITION" that the newspaper is taking is agreeing with FEMA's move to
_temporarily_ ban guns at a site for evacuees living in temporary housing,
for the sake of public safety. On
|
|
|
Thanks for the give and take, but, to me, your perspective is
appalling. Here I am an unpretentious non-lawyer who just happens to
have spent 30 years before DOAH, where I am permitted. There, I've
compiled a respected record, and I have one letter o
|
|
|
I'm writing a novel and hoping someone can help. How would a person
hire a lawyer to deal with buying a bankrupt company in the middle '20s
or early '30s in NYC? Are there sources I can go to? Reply to my
email if you can help
|
|
|
"Bean Fried Pork" <nospam@ilikecheese.net> wrote in message
news:ClK5f.466523$5N3.25210@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Jesus @$#*ing Christ, if I'm reading this correctly, the "OUTRAGEOUS
> POSITION" that the newspaper is taking is agreeing
|
|
|
n article <1129775010.760590.9950@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
"Bob" <Sherins@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Great Larry on this interchange. I've got the relevant parts of this
> response copied below with my present commentary, which I know will be
>
|
|
|
In article <1129770719.033503.259850@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"Bob" <Sherins@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> All right, Larry, I used ostensibly, not having any way of knowing what
> your remarks costituted or what interest you had, if any. And I
>
|
|
|
In article <1129730418.680379.199630@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
"Bob" <Sherins@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> The Florida Bar Censors Criticism Here
> Only 1 message in topic - view as tree
> Bob Oct 19, 9:35 am show options
>
> Newsgroups:
|
|
