|
|
I will keep you posted about the case.
|
|
|
Thanks Larry. I guess I needed somebody to slap me on the face for me
to wake up. I am doing more research on lawyers as I type this.
Becoming a US citizen is the dearest thing to my heart now and the most
important goal in my life at this moment, and
|
|
|
On 13 Nov 2005 18:37:53 -0800, "Publicus" <MANDAMUS05@gmail.com>
wrote:
[snip]
>The reason I am prosecuting my case the way I am doing, is to get a
>closure as soon as possible. As I am typing this, my case has been
>pending for over 1100 days. How
|
|
|
On 13 Nov 2005, Beverly <beverly@hiwaay.net> wrote:
> [ the OP said: ]
>
>> I don't see what kind of disputed facts can exist
>> in my case: a Petition for Hearing on Naturalization.
>
> I don't know the answer to your orignal question, but I DO
|
|
|
Thank you Larry. I think you are right. I should hire a good lawyer.
Thank you Sir.
|
|
|
Also, I was thinking about sending my story to the news media. What do
you think? Any ideas? Thanks.
|
|
|
Thank you all for your valuable contributions. From everybody's opinion
I get the feeling that such motion for summary judgment is premature at
this instant and ought to be filed after defendants' answer.
First, a Summary Judgment Motion asks a Judge
|
|
|
In article <1131891184.847226.90360@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"Publicus" <MANDAMUS05@gmail.com> wrote:
> Larry, could you help me find an example of a motion for summary
> judgment against USCIS (immigration) in cases of Naturalization?
No,
|
|
|
In article <1131889376.399605.242970@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"Publicus" <MANDAMUS05@gmail.com> wrote:
> Larry, so if the case has no disputed facts, then the Plaintiff may
> file a summary judgment motion, otherwise, s/he must wait for the
>
|
|
|
In article <1131889146.418812.188550@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"Publicus" <MANDAMUS05@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Larry. If I am suing to become a United States Citizen pursuant
> to 8 USC 1447 (b) because I am eligible in all aspects: Good mor
|
|
|
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:zsydnS83O5wT7-renZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@ez2.net...
>
> <fjmd1a@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1131882959.357055.318410@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>>
> We have all heard of trials that
|
|
|
ere is what is going to happen....NOTHING!!!!
<kuacou241@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1131883546.415502.220420@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
GUARDIANS FOR PROFIT
When a Family Matter Turns Into a Business
Conservators are supposed to prote
|
|
|
On 13 Nov 2005 05:42:56 -0800, "Publicus" <MANDAMUS05@gmail.com>
wrote:
>Larry, so if the case has no disputed facts, then the Plaintiff may
>file a summary judgment motion, otherwise, s/he must wait for the
>defendants' answer. Am I reading this co
|
|
|
tim (moved to sweden) wrote:
>
> The defense will make a claim of "abuse of process".
> After a while the judge will agree.
>
Yes. A judge certainly can deny a prosecutor the right to come back the
N+1th time, and can also direct an acquital.
|
|
|
<fjmd1a@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1131882959.357055.318410@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>
> Jeff Strickland wrote:
>
>>
>> Agreed, but the same evidence would only be presented in the second trial
>> if
>> the first trial resulted in
|
|
|
In article <1131855915.695172.83660@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
"Publicus" <MANDAMUS05@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can I file a Motion for Summary Judgment before Defendents file their
> answer to my complaint?
>
> Case: Writ of Mandamus. Defendents:
|
|
|
Larry, could you help me find an example of a motion for summary
judgment against USCIS (immigration) in cases of Naturalization?
|
|
|
Larry, so if the case has no disputed facts, then the Plaintiff may
file a summary judgment motion, otherwise, s/he must wait for the
defendants' answer. Am I reading this correctly?
I don't see what kind of disputed facts can exist in my case: a
Pe
|
|
|
Thanks Larry. If I am suing to become a United States Citizen pursuant
to 8 USC 1447 (b) because I am eligible in all aspects: Good moral
character, residency, etc... What kind of facts can be disputed by the
Government?
BTW, the summary judgement
|
|
|
UARDIANS FOR PROFIT
When a Family Matter Turns Into a Business
Conservators are supposed to protect the elderly and infirm. But some
neglect their clients, isolate them -- even plunder their assets.
By Robin Fields, Evelyn Larrubia and Jack Leonar
|
|
|
Jeff Strickland wrote:
>
> Agreed, but the same evidence would only be presented in the second trial if
> the first trial resulted in a hung jury, a jury that could not render a
> decision. If the jury rules for an acquital, there would be no seco
|
|
