alt.lawyers

Seth Wittner <bizzvanwa@cox.net> wrote: > <nospam@isp.com> wrote: > >> Why do you appear to presume that there need be any act >> other than a decision - whether or not stated publicly - by >> the relevant prosecutors simply not to prosecute? > >

Seth Wittner <bizzvanwa@cox.net> wrote: >I am writing a novel. Is there a lawyer or other knowledgable person in >the group who can answer this: What are the limits of what the content >of public referendums and propositions can be? Suppose, for exa

Jeff Strickland wrote: > <top post> > Bull#@($. > > Everybody should be able to easily FEEL what the foot is causing the > engine to do, and the eyes should SEE what the car is doing relative to > the ground. Speeding is speeding, and is ONLY a r

"YooperBoyka" <cj.don'twant@no.spam> wrote in message news:NrudnacCbuz_ovnZnZ2dnUVZ_uidnZ2d@giganews.com... > > "Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:HKSdncLIU8w_TP7ZnZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@ez2.net... > > > > "YooperBoyka" <cj.don't

It may appear that I'm making that presumption. Actually, though, I'm trying to get a thorough understanding of the options available to advocates of clemency for crimes committed under unusual circumstances. If a proposition could produce the outcom

I am writing a novel. Is there a lawyer or other knowledgable person in the group who can answer this: What are the limits of what the content of public referendums and propositions can be? Suppose, for example, an ethnic group felt that acts of vio

<top post> Bull#@($. Everybody should be able to easily FEEL what the foot is causing the engine to do, and the eyes should SEE what the car is doing relative to the ground. Speeding is speeding, and is ONLY a result of the foot being a bit to a

On Fri 12 May 2006, "catfish" <nospam@nos.pam> wrote: ><hallerb@aol.com> wrote in message >news:1147461555.468548.128080@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com... >> Yeah Bush is a complete failure as presidents go. He is in a deathmatch