|
|
New info, Driver of the vehicle was not the vehicle owner and not listed on
the insurance. Florida is a no-fault state and insurance is required. Does
this mean the driver was in violation of the law by even driving the car? I
know that in most sta
|
|
|
The presence or absence of insurance is not a factor in determining fault in
an accident. It is only used to determine if the insurance company will pay
for the damages.
In my state, California, the vehicle itself carries the insurance. That is,
|
|
|
An accident involving a dog and a car occurs in rural Florida on a busy
hi-way. Less than $1000 dollars of damage is done to a car and the dog is
killed. Who is at fault, the owner of the dog or the driver of the car.
There is no leash law for this
|
|
|
"skarsan" <sabina.karsan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1150987401.678931.157410@r2g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Jeff Strickland wrote:
>> "MAP" <mapalmerlaw@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>> news:Wx2mg.8951$o4.8615@newsread2.news.pas.earthl
|
|
|
The OP is a mental patient of some kind, and he wants a placard.
In the scenario you cite, an able-bodied person can get a placard to provide
transportation to mobility challenged family members. The OP has not said
that he has mobility issues.
|
|
|
"skarsan" <sabina.karsan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1150987401.678931.157410@r2g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Jeff Strickland wrote:
>> "MAP" <mapalmerlaw@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>> news:Wx2mg.8951$o4.8615@newsread2.news.pas.earthl
|
|
|
IF there is a leash law, then the dog owner has liability for damages to the
car.
You said there is no leash law though, so I would guess that the car owner
will have to file against his insurance policy, my second guess is that it
is paid under
|
|
|
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:dhdm92pt4dbo7gdiea9fqeq4dq6b4677e7@4ax.com...
> What's so funny about peace, love and GOP Kills Liberals
> <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> posting the following o
|
|
|
Previously, on alt.atheism, Douglas Berry in episode
<dhdm92pt4dbo7gdiea9fqeq4dq6b4677e7@4ax.com>...
> What's so funny about peace, love and GOP Kills Liberals
> <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> posting the following on 22
> Jun 2006 20:
|
|
|
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 00:31:06 GMT, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:
>What's so funny about peace, love and GOP Kills Liberals
><Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> posting the following on
>22 Jun 2006 20:32:07 -0000 i
|
|
|
ARNING: Industry is Blogging These NewsGroups to Protect Their
Monopolies
To : All participants and readers of sci.med, misc.health.alternative,
uk.people.health, talk.politics.medicine
Please be aware that many comments and responses posted to this
|
|
|
i went out to practice golf a little today, up way too early if you ask
me, 4am is too early for most people (but what can I do, I guess I have
to accept that! So much for not accepting anything - of course, nothing
is accepted that I can do, quite
|
|
|
Jeff,
I wasn't talking about mental conditions. Perhaps I haven't followed the
thread long enough without jumping in. I was talking about the person who
is old, has trouble walking and gets someone to take them to a store and go
in and get a ca
|
|
|
What's so funny about peace, love and GOP Kills Liberals
<Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> posting the following on
22 Jun 2006 20:32:07 -0000 iin alt.atheism?
>Daniel Joseph Min
So, any updates on the Khan of Terror that you swore woul
|
|
