|
|
In article <1155393263.355227.271840@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
Skybuck <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> wrote:
>I seek a good-class-action-lawsuit-lawyer which isn't too expensive, as
>I said no cure no pay.
Good luck. You won't find one.
>I am not
|
|
|
W. K. Mahler www.worldmediahost.com wrote:
> Janet Morris of the Global Strategy Council, a Washington "think-tank"
> tied to the CIA and Federal Government, "is a key U.S. liaison between
> Russian and U.S. officials." Morris is a long time close as
|
|
|
In article <eblej9$bbl$1@reader2.panix.com>,
sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
> In article <1155393263.355227.271840@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> Skybuck <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >I am not intested in your oppinions,
>
> I
|
|
|
I will be entering my second year in law school this fall. I have been
doing some serious thinking this summer about what kind of law I'd like
to practice and now I'm thinking about Copyright law. I have a fairly
decent grasp of music, having played the
|
|
|
I seek a good-class-action-lawsuit-lawyer which isn't too expensive, as
I said no cure no pay.
I am not intested in your oppinions, and I am not intested in
discussing any facts, because it would be pointless without a good
lawyer.
The correct co
|
|
|
I use sites like 3hive.com to find new, obscure-esque music then
proceed to buying.
iTunes is great, but MP3sale is
kinda cool too (real cheap, there's no DRM, not sure about the
legality of it though).
|
|
|
AmJur 2nd, Bailments, paragraph 3 says "the bailed property may consist
of money". Unimaginable to me. By definition money is bearer
instrument, e.g. may be used only upon representation and only by the
person who holds it. So how can the bailor ke
|
|
|
Yet there are some things I can not understand
Actions in tort presume there should be (i) injure (to the property
may be) (ii) some degree of fault (whether negligence or intentional
wrong), - e.g. substantial things rather. What about your
|
|
|
To say more specifically back to your illusionary "widget case" (how to
return property back to the bailor)
1. No tests
2. First thing the court will probably do is to define the legal basis
for action (if out of contract - of what kind of contrac
|
|
|
Such thing as the standards of care of a bailee is not the (primary)
concern of our law. Neither the benefit-factor is the basis for the
differentiation. Even admitting the existence of the "right of
possession" our legal science does not go further
|
|
|
I am some late. I hope your still watching this topic.
I was glad to see such a detailed reply.
Back to the languages, Russian law is not only the matter of
translation, there should be more deep involvement into it to
understand the difference.
|
|
|
Very funny, when I finally write a reply Google seems be blocking it.
I allows to write only short chat-like-messages :(
I do not know what to do. Give me a hint, please.
Or come to my forum www.legallyrussia.com
Andrey
|
|
|
In article <20060811174518.N63459.richw@whodunit.richw.org>,
richw@richw.org (Rich Wales) wrote:
> dommanno@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > IIRC, a jury in a capital case _must_ be "death-qualified,"
> > i.e., all jurors must be pro-death penalty
|
|
|
A month or two.
"girl watcher" <girlwatcherqrt@sbcglobol.net> wrote in message
news:9o%Cg.6289$kO3.1932@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
>A friend had a personal injury on the job and sued his employer. he
> recently decided to settle the suit and si
|
|
