|
Say the US has an ally nation [Ally] and a suspected hostile nation
[Hostile].
Say there are outside target nations of the hostile [H-Target] & the ally
[A-Target].
Is it legal for [Ally] to act in the US against a naturalized US Citizen,
originally from [H-Target], to provide identity backup or another advantage
for [Hostile] in [H-Target]?
I introduced [A-Target] as one possible explanation for why [Ally] might
offer these services. Such as, [Hostile] might be an ally of [A-Target] &
provide proxy services to [Ally] in [A-Target].
Is the FBI required to insulate a citizen against this arrangement if it's
directly detrimental to US interests, but no obvious rights violations have
occurred? Does the answer to this change, and how, if [H-Target] is a state
relatively neutral to the US? What level of interest of [Ally] in the
citizen is likely to exceed threshold? How about interest in a legal
resident?
A political question: Assuming [H-Target] is aware of the arrangement, what
exchange of services might it offer the US that neutralize this? What
parameters might go into making this a fair exchange?
Thanks for your insights.
PS: Any groups / sites where posters have working insights into this sort of
strategy?
|
| |
| |
|
