misc.legal.moderated

"Mr Lion" <lion_decent@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:gviqtv4pnhkde30ot7vasjogbd26kr2mf4@4ax.com... > > Can.$100,000 (approximately half the tax debt exclusive of interest > > and penalties) as the amount to be paid over 60 months as condition to >

On 15/12/03 5:52, in article gviqtv4pnhkde30ot7vasjogbd26kr2mf4@4ax.com, "Mr Lion" <lion_decent@yahoo.com> wrote: > I have a similar question as aasked by the 1st poster, but not as > serious. > > In case the person has been laid off and has to le

--------------------------------------------------------------- AN E-BULLETIN LEGAL INFORMATION INSTITUTE -- CORNELL LAW SCHOOL lii\@lii.law.cornell.edu ----------------------------------------------

What are some good writings, please, on the balance and conflict between the establishment and free exercise clauses? Not necessarily the rulings from bad cases ("You can put up a Christmas Tree as long as you put up a Menorah, but a Creche is right

Tam wrote: > > chesler@post.harvard.edu (David S Chesler) wrote in message > news:<selhtvg5k334clm7nql6q7je1mg085nqp9@4ax.com>... > > > (Personally, I'm still stuck with two items I don't want [one was > > not as described, the other was the less

Tim Provis wrote: >"If it is some gov't entity, how do you go about collecting?" > ... the case ( at least the civil rights cause >of action) will be dismissed due to official immunity. > > > If the search was illegal (no warrant or wron

In article <aelhtv4l4c04m0pesssshpij91d6jn902v@4ax.com>, Barry Gold <bgold@nyx.net> wrote: > But there's a problem: anything >admitted into evidence usually becomes part of the "public records", >which would effectively destroy your copyright. A

In article <dkiqtvg7nqqr20flu3eumpcdo0vbjfva2d@4ax.com>, John A. Weeks III <john@johnweeks.com> wrote: >In article <83eftvgl6cuu2sosmstqta24i1cnm7scae@4ax.com>, Ripley7173 ><ripley7173@aol.com> wrote: > >> I was just served with a lawsuit from my ex-

Dear Legal Guru's, Over the past couple years I have worked in a large corporation coordinating and capturing federally regulated documents. During my stay at the corp. I was asked to develop a system that would take these documents, and calcu

I went to the arraignment and pleaded not guilty for the speed ticket I received. The commissioner arranged a court trial date for me and I agreed. When I got home, I realized that the court date is over 45 days from the date of my arraignment. Is this

I signed a contract for fixing my home provided my insurance company agrees to pay for the damage caused by hail/wind. Now my insurance has company denied it, hence I have to pay from my pocket for fixing my home. Meanwhile I find another contractor wh

nx0404a@hotmail.com (J Bimford) wrote in message news:<2miqtv0bdqshfsdt3ng4hs1ja7t864g6hd@4ax.com>... > For the last several years, I have worked, through fanfiction and > Internet-based RPGs (one of which I actually run), on an existing, > copyrighte

barry@psyber.com writes: > Certified Mail would not offer proof that a document was received in > itself. It only offers proof that an envelop was mailed and received. > It would not in itself certify the *contents* of the envelope were present.

J! wrote: > For the last several years, I have worked, through fanfiction and > Internet-based RPGs (one of which I actually run), on an existing, > copyrighted universe, currently owned by a major corporate > conglomerate. However, my changes

Robert wrote: >[owns house in joint custory. Other tenent wishes to sell and keep all the proceeds] > > Now, my mom has gone to a lawyer, and she says that the lawyer assures > her that since she paid all of the mortgage payments and property > taxe

robert2513@yahoo.com (Robert) wrote: > My father passed away when I was 17. ( This was 25 years ago, > and I'm trying to remember the details, but it's been a long time, > so some details are hazy). > > My dad was a civil servant, and when he di

bgold@nyx.net (Barry Gold) wrote: > John F. Carr <jfc@mit.edu> wrote: >>There used to be property that could not legally be sold to >>non-white buyers. As far as I know the prohibitions were >>permanent. Some had not expired as of 2000, though the S

In article <4liqtvgpf3nkepvqug6svpci01tjpkltg3@4ax.com> in misc.legal.moderated, Curious wrote: >Suppose that my company websites had their domain names banned from another >competing site. The other site is much larger, and the owner typically does

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 00:52:22 -0500, cj.green@worldnet.att.net (Christopher Green) wrote: >Duhaime has a clever article on the Rule Against Perpetuities ("a >review of the most complicated damn legal rule ever!"), with a >discussion of pitfalls and e

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 00:52:10 -0500, nx0404a@hotmail.com (J Bimford) wrote: >For the last several years, I have worked, through fanfiction and >Internet-based RPGs (one of which I actually run), on an existing, >copyrighted universe, currently owned

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 00:52:03 -0500, tamsuraiya@yahoo.ca (Tam) wrote: >Werner Cohn <wernerco@att.net> wrote in message >news:<tck7tvg5ig6levnruj91335iv5pfet37hu@4ax.com>... >> Some US states have abolished joint tenancy, so it is possible that your

I have a friend who's developed a logo to represent a term he's coined. He would like to make it available for anyone who wants to use it, but he's worried that someone could grab it, trademark it, and then prevent him or anyone else from using it. (he