|
|
A few year's ago I lent someone (a "friend") $1,650. They have not
repaid any of the loan. I know I should have gotten it in writing but I
didn't. We verbally agreed, the money was a loan and that he would pay
me back.
I do have the original che
|
|
|
I>> And even if it _did_ have wording that said repeat customers would
I>> be charged the "regular" price, many states' attorney generals
I>> would probably treat it as deceptive advertising.
I> What makes you say it is probably deceptive?
My gues
|
|
|
On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 08:27:57 -0500, jkampert@hotmail.com (Jerry)
wrote:
>Does the law allow for an employer to continue to use a terminated
>employees email address?
I'm somewhat surprised that you need to ask such a question. Of c
|
|
|
On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 08:27:57 -0500, Jerry <jkampert@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Does the law allow for an employer to continue to use a terminated
> employees email address?
Interesting question.
Arguably the company cannot advertise an association wi
|
|
|
>206.67.68.97
I take it you live in Virginia from your IP address. The SOL on debt
in Colorado is:
Oral Agreements | Written Contracts | Promissory Notes | Open Accounts
6 6 6 6 years
http
|
|
|
I am having a problem with a community college in Florida. I have been
referred to many attorneys through the local bar assoc. and none of them are
willing to take the case. What type of attorney should I look for, or what
resource should I use to find
|
|
|
One of the less wonderful parts of the new CAN SPAM act is that it
preempts state laws. In particular, any state laws that regulate or
prohibit spam are voided as of 1/1/04 when CAN SPAM went into effect.
My question is whether Federal preemption is
|
|
|
We have 5 acres of land we bought in 1972. It was part of a 20 acre parcel that
had been divided into 4 lots. Ours being the 3rd lot from the highway. The deed
grants a 30ft. easement along the front of all 4 lots for " ingress and egress
and utility
|
|
|
>> But there is also the possibility that the court will overlook the
>> long delay, particularly if she were armed with evidence that the West
>> Coast boyfriend is not the father and her lawyer were to present a
>> case at equity or a case "in the in
|
|
|
SITUATION
I live in a rent controlled apartment in San Francisco. The terms of the
agreement between me and the landlord were defined, along with the correct
amount of rent, when I petitioned the Rent Stabilization and Arbitration
Board. There wa
|
|
|
A few year's ago I lent someone (a "friend") $1,650. They have not
repaid any of the loan. I know I should have gotten it in writing but I
didn't. We did both verbally agree it was a loan and that he would pay
me back.
I do have the check I wrote
|
|
|
In article <j72ovv8g6pot8vb4b5ms5rk3niuhkc4sue@4ax.com>,
Paul Cassel <paul1@abq.com> wrote:
>Vic Dura wrote:
>> Are there any thoughts here on how effective the Federal CAN-SPAM act
>> will be?
>
>IMO, the problem will intensify because it gives leg
|
|
|
In article <l62ovvgrpb92u2jvqhacjjr8lo9iobctd1@4ax.com>,
Jerry <jkampert@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Does the law allow for an employer to continue to use a terminated
>employees email address?
If the employer owns the domain, sure. The employer owns the
|
|
|
In article <umilvv0f9dfhb706fqt1maacmebmhb2d4a@4ax.com>,
The Todal <the_todalnospam@msn.com> wrote:
>The difference is the likelihood of an accidental breakage. If you invited
>people to examine your car with a view to buying it, and one of the door
|
|
|
On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 08:27:55 -0500, Rancy Snyder <rancy@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> I have read the Florida Probate statutes. Either I have missed it or
> isn't covered in the statutes. My wife and I own everything as joint with
> the right of survivo
|
|
|
On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 08:27:24 -0500, NRL <remove.me@news.ipswitch.com> wrote:
>
> Here is my issue:
>
> In 1991 I attended a private college in Colorado and after I left, I
> owed about $1,200 in debt. This was not in student loans - this was
> mo
|
|
|
In article <l62ovvgrpb92u2jvqhacjjr8lo9iobctd1@4ax.com>, Jerry
<jkampert@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Does the law allow for an employer to continue to use a terminated
> employees email address?
I don't think that there is a law on usage of e-mail addre
|
|
|
I'm going to establish a limited trust. Since my son's mother is rather
argumentative, I am considering having the trust administered (in the event
of my death) by an attorney. However, if I chose an attorney of similar
age to mine, it's possible t
|
|
|
On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 08:27:55 -0500, "Rancy Snyder"
<rancy@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>My wife and I own everything as joint with
>the right of survivorship, including real estate, autos, bank accounts,
>etc.. My will leaves everything to my wife. Upon my
|
|
|
On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 08:27:52 -0500, Katherine Griffis-Greenberg
<egylist@griffis-consulting.com> wrote:
>In the first paragraph, I gave the general sense of what it is to be a
>"practicing attorney." In the 2nd - 7th paragraphs, I gave what the law
|
|
|
Rancy Snyder <rancy@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> I have read the Florida Probate statutes. Either I have missed it or
>isn't covered in the statutes. My wife and I own everything as joint with
>the right of survivorship, including real estate, autos, ba
|
|
|
"Jerry" <jkampert@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:l62ovvgrpb92u2jvqhacjjr8lo9iobctd1@4ax.com...
> Does the law allow for an employer to continue to use a terminated
> employees email address?
>
It would be easier to provide a meaningful answer i
|
|
|
>
>Does the law allow for an employer to continue to use a terminated
>employees email address?
What is the context for your question?
The short answer is, I believe, "Yes." But I am just basing that on the fact
it is common practice for an empl
|
|
|
I wrote:
>> And even if it _did_ have wording that said repeat customers would be
>> charged the "regular" price, many states' attorney generals would
>> probably treat it as deceptive advertising.
Isaac <isaac@latveria.castledoom.org> wrote:
>Wha
|
|
|
baumgrenze@yahoo.com (John Baum) wrote:
> I would like to forgive part of a loan I made to my son.
Stuart O. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>Actually, as someone else mentioned, there is no cancellation of
>indebtedness income if it's a
|
|
|
"Rancy Snyder" <rancy@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> I have read the Florida Probate statutes. Either I have
> missed it or isn't covered in the statutes. My wife and I own
> everything as joint with the right of survivorship, including real
> estate, au
|
|
|
On 7/1/04 13:27, in article 762ovvkq84fs1b4aknehv114ggpp94h9jg@4ax.com,
"Eliyahu Rooff" <lrooff@hotmail.com> wrote:
> But if you gave a friend the same kind of advice it would be the practice of
> law.
If cocktail party chatter is the "practice o
|
|
|
On 7/1/04 13:27, in article c62ovv8s3staipv2f73v4oia087d8mun3r@4ax.com,
"Isaac" <isaac@latveria.castledoom.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 09:51:16 -0500, Tam <tamsuraiya@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>>
>> By the way, "attorney" doesn't necessarily mean "att
|
|
|
On 7/1/04 13:28, in article s62ovvo2bp3nd1cq6t9m93r20r0s147i7q@4ax.com,
"John F. Carr" <jfc@mit.edu> wrote:
> M, a resident of state A, has sex with W, a resident of state B, in
> state C. M moves to state D. W moves to state E and has M's baby.
>
|
|
|
On 7/1/04 13:28, in article 372ovvoo7t7i2ben369gqdh8f82to5vuah@4ax.com, "Bob
Brenchley." <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote:
>> No legal document exists changing her name to "Betty Lou Wilson",>> however
>> since her mid 20's she's used "Betty L
|
|
|
It seems "Jerry" wrote in misc.legal.moderated in article
<l62ovvgrpb92u2jvqhacjjr8lo9iobctd1@4ax.com>:
>Does the law allow for an employer to continue to use a terminated
>employees email address?
You mean, one that was assigned to the employee by
|
|
|
On 6/1/04 14:50, in article 5milvv8kmtshs3icnnbl7vukhf9vocpne1@4ax.com,
"Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote:
> Dan -- I'll have to take your word for it. But -- in the event
> the trustee and beneficiary are NOT the same -- the trust
|
|
|
Jerry wrote:
> Does the law allow for an employer to continue to use a terminated
> employees email address?
>
Why wouldn't it? It's the employer's equipment and the address
was assigned to the employee by the employer. The employer may wish
to c
|
|
|
On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 08:27:48 -0500, Dan Evans <dan@evans-legal.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Jan 2004 08:16:21 -0500, bellemansfield@netscape.net
> (bellemansfield) wrote:
>
>>Now, some of them are threatening legal action
>>against me because the inform
|
|
|
n Wed, 07 Jan 2004 08:27:52 -0500,
Katherine Griffis-Greenberg <egylist@griffis-consulting.com> wrote:
>
> Please note that the Alabama law did make specific exception that
> certain actions covered within their definition _did not_ apply to
> cert
|
|
|
Jerry wrote:
>
> Does the law allow for an employer to continue to use a terminated
> employees email address?
What law would forbid it?
--
This account is subject to a persistent MS Blaster and SWEN attack.
I think I've got the problem resolve
|
|
|
Dan Evans wrote:
> Whether a trust is an "entity" really has significance in only two
> contexts that I am aware of:
>
> 1. Who can be sue or be sued? Technically, a trust cannot be sue or
> be sued, but the trustee can. (Even though, if truste
|
|
|
* Michael Jacobs
| There's plenty of other things you can do with a J.D. degree besides being a
| practicing lawyer. You just can't hold yourself out as a professional
| lawyer, if you're not.
What about working for a government agency; handling
|
|
|
Quoting jkampert@hotmail.com (Jerry):
>Does the law allow for an employer to continue to use a terminated
>employees email address?
What are they using it for?
|
|
