|
|
Tam wrote:
> Finally, there are grantor trusts, a creation of federal tax laws.
Now THAT is wrong. Grantor trusts are treated as non-grantor trusts,
except they are regarded as being the grantor or beneficiary for
income tax purposes. (Which on
|
|
|
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 14:30:03 -0500, <barry@psyber.com> wrote:
>I'm going to establish a limited trust. Since my son's mother is rather
>argumentative, I am considering having the trust administered (in the event
>of my death) by an attorney. Howeve
|
|
|
I just signed my daughter up for swim school. I don't think the intent is
insidious, but at the last minute they shoved a release form in my face. I
briefly read through it, and thought it was a bit bizarre. I didn't get a copy
of it, so I'm repea
|
|
|
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 14:30:11 -0500, John R. Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote:
> One of the less wonderful parts of the new CAN SPAM act is that it
> preempts state laws. In particular, any state laws that regulate or
> prohibit spam are voided as of 1/1/
|
|
|
It seems "Marshall Naquin" wrote in misc.legal.moderated in article
<5nbrvv8b6tg48cjshmrqjsvesq2i8ji4nd@4ax.com>:
>I am having a problem with a community college in Florida. I have been
>referred to many attorneys through the local bar assoc. and none
|
|
|
>>>>> On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 14:29:53 -0500, Stan Brown ("Stan") writes:
Stan> It seems "Jerry" wrote in misc.legal.moderated in article
Stan> <l62ovvgrpb92u2jvqhacjjr8lo9iobctd1@4ax.com>:
>> Does the law allow for an employer to continue to use a t
|
|
|
It seems "Tim" wrote in misc.legal.moderated in article
<enbrvvkao8o826jm4dkok02vol3ok3d28j@4ax.com>:
>A few years ago I lent someone (a "friend") $1,650. They have not
>repaid any of the loan. I know I should have gotten it in writing but I
>didn'
|
|
|
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 14:29:59 -0500, "Eliyahu Rooff"
<lrooff@hotmail.com> wrote:
>was provided for his use while he was working there. Normally, when
>someone leaves a company, the first thing they do is to shut down
>his e-mail account so that he wo
|
|
|
In article <enbrvvkao8o826jm4dkok02vol3ok3d28j@4ax.com>, Tim
<timbb2@hotmail.com> wrote:
> A few year's ago I lent someone (a "friend") $1,650. They have not
> repaid any of the loan. I know I should have gotten it in writing but I
> didn't. We v
|
|
|
Tim <timbb2@hotmail.com> wrote:
>A few year's ago I lent someone (a "friend") $1,650. They have not
>repaid any of the loan. I know I should have gotten it in writing but I
>didn't. We verbally agreed, the money was a loan and that he would pay
>
|
|
|
On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 08:27:57 -0500, jkampert@hotmail.com (Jerry)
wrote:
>Does the law allow for an employer to continue to use a terminated
>employees email address?
It has been my experience that, when an employee leaves a company, any
letter ad
|
|
|
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 14:30:03 -0500, <barry@psyber.com> wrote:
>I'm going to establish a limited trust. Since my son's mother is rather
>argumentative, I am considering having the trust administered (in the event
>of my death) by an attorney. Howeve
|
|
|
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 14:30:03 -0500, <barry@psyber.com> wrote:
>
>I'm going to establish a limited trust. Since my son's mother is rather
>argumentative, I am considering having the trust administered (in the event
>of my death) by an attorney. How
|
|
|
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 14:29:49 -0500, "Arthur L. Rubin"
<ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote:
>Dan Evans wrote:
>
>> Whether a trust is an "entity" really has significance in only two
>> contexts that I am aware of:
>>
>> 1. Who can be sue or be sue
|
|
|
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 14:29:56 -0500, Tam <tamsuraiya@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> On 7/1/04 13:27, in article 762ovvkq84fs1b4aknehv114ggpp94h9jg@4ax.com,
> "Eliyahu Rooff" <lrooff@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> But if you gave a friend the same kind of advice it woul
|
|
|
bushst2@aol.commmmmmmmm (BushSt2) wrote:
> I live in a rent controlled apartment in San Francisco. The
> terms of the agreement between me and the landlord were defined,
> along with the correct amount of rent, when I petitioned the
> Rent Stabili
|
|
|
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 14:29:55 -0500, Tam <tamsuraiya@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>
> It is almost always (not universally, but mostly) a defense to UPL that you
> were not practicing or seeking to practice law. If you were just trying to
> pick up girls in a bar
|
|
|
Tim <timbb2@hotmail.com> wrote:
> A few year's ago I lent someone (a "friend") $1,650. They have
> not repaid any of the loan. I know I should have gotten it in
> writing but I didn't. We did both verbally agree it was a loan
> and that he would
|
|
|
<barry@psyber.com> wrote:
> I'm going to establish a limited trust. Since my son's mother
> is rather argumentative, I am considering having the trust
> administered (in the event of my death) by an attorney.
> However, if I chose an attorney of s
|
|
|
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 14:30:14 -0500, bat <bat@bats.com> wrote:
> I>> And even if it _did_ have wording that said repeat customers would
> I>> be charged the "regular" price, many states' attorney generals
> I>> would probably treat it as deceptive adver
|
|
|
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 14:29:58 -0500, Barry Gold <bgold@nyx.net> wrote:
> I wrote:
>>> And even if it _did_ have wording that said repeat customers would be
>>> charged the "regular" price, many states' attorney generals would
>>> probably treat it as d
|
|
|
<barry@psyber.com> wrote in message
news:fmbrvv8glf5h8h7rrq0fgjbj493ki1ohg6@4ax.com...
>
[creating a trust with atty as trustee]
>
> In that case, who would administer the trust should the attorney no longer
> be practicing law or die?
>
The per
|
|
