|
|
I was in small claims court in Massachussetts the other day,
and immediately before my case was called, the lawyer from
the other side went up to the magistrate and chatted with him.
They turned off the tape recorder. They appeared to be talking
abo
|
|
|
On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 15:25:54 GMT, wheel <wheel@idontthinkso.zom>
wrote:
> A client has refused to pay two invoices for consulting work. In
> CA, does anyone have an idea about the following two questions:
>
> [1] County of jurisdiction. I did mos
|
|
|
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:39:48 GMT, amchitka@mailexcite.com (George
Hamilton) wrote:
> A trial court is prohibited from appealing its own decision to an
> appeal court to affirm is decision? What U.S. Constitution part
> addresses this principle?
|
|
|
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 13:27:29 GMT, mjacobslaw@comcast.net (Michael
Jacobs) wrote:
> "Robert Noble" <robertnoble@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:<imjn00l1l3pn56iiq6n1782tu7h1gmhade@4ax.com>...
>> As OP let me clarify the question a bit.
>>
>>
|
|
|
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:40:14 GMT, esther8850@hotmail.com (Ronald)
wrote:
> An 82 year old woman was a "passenger" in a car accident in Los
> Angeles and broke her wrist and knee cap. Her Kaiser insurance
> plan is covering all her medical expenses
|
|
|
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:40:23 GMT, Tam <tamsuraiya@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> On 11/2/04 18:06, in article
> bdrk201hgkvem6ms0qnqg3843hu0jkauna@4ax.com, "James Alexander"
> <jwalex77@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> Succession laws are irrelevant because we're no
|
|
|
Hi:
My nephew was working on a bulk carrier with a Hong Kong flag.
He died due to a gas leak on the ship, and based on the facts we have,
as a Cadet (with only 6 months of experiencE), he was not supposed to
be doing the job he was asked to perform.
|
|
|
in article uq9q20lgh4cm708umg88naauq6ppidvitf@4ax.com, Chris at
neuroflow@hotmail.com wrote on 2/13/04 2:40 PM:
> It's a little confusing, so let me summarize:
>
> 1) Customer places order on my website for cigarettes through legal
> overseas re
|
|
|
We live in a rural area. Our mail is delivered by a contract carrier. The
position is bid out periodically and the incumbent carrier is often underbid
by a new contractor. It takes a while for a new carrier to get to know the
route. Our last carrie
|
|
|
>>>>> On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:05:34 -0500, Paul Cassel ("Paul") writes:
Paul> Allan Adler wrote:
>> I think that if someone buys a gun, he has to get a license for it.
>> What if someone has a machine shop and makes his own gun?
>>
Paul> You n
|
|
|
>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 09:29:07 -0500, Allan Adler ("Allan") writes:
Allan> I think that if someone buys a gun, he has to get a license for it.
This depends where you live, but in most of the United States,
you DO NOT need any permit to purchase,
|
|
|
My mother is 52 and already declared back in Feb. 1997. She is now so
far in debt again that she (should) declare again. Her yearly income
isn't anymore than 21K, she has no personal assets, no money in
savings/bonds/stocks, and a minimal amount in h
|
|
|
Swan1944 wrote:
>[starting a video editing business]
>
> If a couple should hire me and had a specific song (which they owned),
> would I be able to include the song within their video, without fear
> of copyright infringement?
A copyright is a li
|
|
|
Ronald wrote:
> Summons also shows Plaintiff suing individually and as "Attorney In
> Fact" for several of his investor friends who reside overseas. I
> contacted two of the other investors and they state they never signed
> a document giving Plain
|
|
|
John Penta wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> For whatever reason, some of the roleplaying I do online has gotten me
> curious lately. Much of that roleplaying is in geopolitical-themed
> RPGs, and rather out of the blue, I'm wondering about labor law, as it
> r
|
|
|
Stan Brown wrote:
>
> It seems "Paul Cassel" wrote in misc.legal.moderated:
> >John Smith wrote:
> >[rent he paid was stolen from landlord's office]
> >>
> >>Am I responsible for paying the apartment office again?
> >
> >I'm unaware of any point
|
|
|
Isaac <isaac@latveria.castledoom.org> wrote in message
news:<5q9q20hcfies2f9894gq8rc6h3bpuo8goe@4ax.com>...
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:06:05 -0500, Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote:
> > In article <3aqh2016pa3k1au1ak02m54gkfhjeqolft@4ax.com>,
> >
|
|
|
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:39:52 -0500, Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> i
wrote:
> It seems "Arthur L. Rubin" wrote in misc.legal.moderated:
>
>>It may depend on your state (even if, for some reason, there
>>were to be a Federal cause of action)
|
|
|
dpip wrote:
> I purchased a dirt bike for my daughter recently and the seller did
> not have a title. He gave me the bill of sale he had for when he
> bought it and said we can do a lost title search with DMV. When I
> went to register with DMV they
|
|
|
ron doctors wrote:
> I would like to know what the laws are regarding the use of foot
> pathways on private land that have been in use for a long time ( over
> 30 years). Does the public have any rights since the use has continued
> for so long. Speci
|
|
|
John Penta <pentaj2REMOVETHIS@uofs.edu> wrote in message
news:<vq9q20dvscpodts7jep40mtbuqqdi9lvet@4ax.com>...
> A small question the post-9/11 world has brought to my mind.
>
> Assume, if you will, that for whatever reason (Suicide plane during
> So
|
|
|
juneaukid wrote:
[wishes to relocate or change common mailbox stand]
>
> I have checked with the local post office, police and city code with
> no luck. I have tried numerous "neighborhood law" books...no luck.
>
Can you detail what your local postm
|
|
|
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:40:34 -0500, Scott Hedrick <dinehnm@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> "Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message
> news:ucrk20t70hike8qb31f1guiccno5334277@4ax.com...
>> In article <haqh20dppmpp6ms1do9fet5ls2970rm7ed@4ax.com>,
>>
|
|
|
> A trial court is prohibited from appealing its own decision to an
> appeal court to affirm is decision?
Correct.
> What U.S. Constitution part addresses this principle?
Article III establishes the federal judiciary. Nothing in the constitution
|
|
|
> An 82 year old woman was a "passenger" in a car accident in Los
> Angeles and broke her wrist and knee cap. Her Kaiser insurance plan
> is covering all her medical expenses but it's apparent the woman will
> never recover her ability to live complet
|
|
|
rdoctors@cox.net (ron doctors) wrote in message
news:<po9q20lnpbpftnqu4j9afju9b1lcbj1t0l@4ax.com>...
> I would like to know what the laws are regarding the use of foot
> pathways on private land that have been in use for a long time ( over
> 30 years)
|
|
|
It seems "George Hamilton" wrote in misc.legal.moderated:
>A trial court is prohibited from appealing its own decision to an
>appeal court to affirm is decision? What U.S. Constitution part
>addresses this principle?
It's the same part of the Const
|
|
|
greenguard@comcast.net (dpip) wrote in message
news:<np9q20ht9erk55qgs4oeppk0l3292s6kt0@4ax.com>...
> I purchased a dirt bike for my daughter recently and the seller did
> not have a title. He gave me the bill of sale he had for when he
> bought it a
|
|
|
It seems "Ronald" wrote in misc.legal.moderated:
>An 82 year old woman was a "passenger" in a car accident in Los
>Angeles and broke her wrist and knee cap.
I don't understand the quotes. Was she a passenger or wasn't she?
> Her Kaiser insurance
|
|
|
It seems "Chris" wrote in misc.legal.moderated:
>There are overseas companies that sell cigarettes through the Internet
>to American customers legally for roughly 25% of the price most people
>pay in the states here. Currently, this is legal and permit
|
|
|
It seems "John Penta" wrote in misc.legal.moderated:
>A small question the post-9/11 world has brought to my mind.
>
>Assume, the President is killed. As are the Speaker of the
>House, the Pres Pro Tem, and so on and so forth through the Line of
>Suc
|
|
|
>Assume, if you will, that for whatever reason (Suicide plane during
>SotU? I dunno...), the President is killed. As are the Speaker of the
>House, the Pres Pro Tem, and so on and so forth through the Line of
>Succession.
>
>Yes, including all of the
|
|
|
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:39:47 -0500 ron doctors <rdoctors@cox.net> whittled these
words:
> I would like to know what the laws are regarding the use of foot
> pathways on private land that have been in use for a long time ( over
> 30 years). Does the pu
|
|
|
junkswansom@hotmail.com (Swan1944) wrote:
> I am looking to start a small video production business. I'm
> planning on producing mostly weddings and special events, etc.
> I am not planning on retaining the copyrights for the videos
> myself (i.e.
|
|
|
esther8850@hotmail.com (Ronald) wrote:
> I am being sued in California Superior Court. The summons
> references a document that is missing from my paperwork. If I
> notify Plaintiff's attorney in writing or fax of the missing
> document, is that
|
|
|
rdoctors@cox.net (ron doctors) wrote:
> I would like to know what the laws are regarding the use of foot
> pathways on private land that have been in use for a long time (
> over 30 years). Does the public have any rights since the use
> has continu
|
|
|
"David W." <usenet@walc.com.pluto> wrote:
> Actually, the check was the property of the apartment complex at
> the time it was stolen. It should have been returned to them,
> not the person who wrote the check. I'd bet the apartment
> owner/manager
|
|
|
Isaac <isaac@latveria.castledoom.org> wrote:
> Stuart O. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>> lisa.greig@btopenworld.com (Lisa Greig) wrote:
>>
>>> How do I go about gaining copyright permission for my web site
>>> that I am creating?
>>
>
|
|
|
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> It seems "Arthur L. Rubin" wrote in misc.legal.moderated:
>
>>It may depend on your state (even if, for some reason, there
>>were to be a Federal cause of action), but I believe
>>damages for ordinar
|
|
|
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:39:48 -0500, amchitka@mailexcite.com (George
Hamilton) wrote:
>A trial court is prohibited from appealing its own decision to an
>appeal court to affirm is decision? What U.S. Constitution part
>addresses this principle?
A
|
|
|
Isaac <isaac@latveria.castledoom.org> wrote:
> In North Carolina, there would still be the risk of adverse
> possession because NC does not require the squatter to pay taxes
> on the land to be eligible. But it would take 20 years of
> walling some
|
|
|
"Scott Hedrick" <dinehnm@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<oq9q20deokt3h1dj7d1jrijsdoeikgd4h6@4ax.com>...
> The insurance status of the surveyors does not change the liability of the
> person who knocks down the fence, particularly if that person invok
|
|
|
David W. wrote:
> "Paul Cassel" <paul1@abq.com> wrote in
> news:obrk20tbkfh0goaagreqqtqkitjqfbc27u@4ax.com:
>
>> John Smith wrote:
>> [rent he paid was stolen from landlord's office]
>>>
>>> Am I responsible for paying the apartment office again?
|
|
|
Stan Brown wrote:
> It seems "Paul Cassel" wrote in misc.legal.moderated:
>> John Smith wrote:
>> [rent he paid was stolen from landlord's office]
>>>
>>> Am I responsible for paying the apartment office again?
>>
>> I'm unaware of any point of law
|
|
|
If you choose to respond to what I have written below, do us all
a favor and limit your response to the statute law, case law, and
the Constitution.
I am a Republican and I support all non-violent cohabitation
arrangements between consenting adults.
|
|
|
"TP Diffenbach" <dejagoogle@diffenbach.org> wrote in message
news:cq9q20lmrgt98plgequo9ss0rdgjp0tb26@4ax.com...
<details of breakdown snipped>
> At this point, I want the repair shop to fix the unit and actually
> replace the circuit board. To p
|
|
|
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:40:05 -0500, jfc@mit.edu (John F. Carr) wrote:
>I'm slightly confused by this decision, or perhaps by the law.
>Apparently AOL's liability for copyright infringement for
>storing files posted from outside its system depends on
|
|
|
On 13/2/04 19:40, in article up9q201i33o4fkdcj9d549dct1vpvmfo4o@4ax.com,
"David Chesler" <chesler@post.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
> So I don't get it what's the big deal with this Brit contractor signing
> over his cheques to his wife with one short str
|
|
|
In article <uq9q20lgh4cm708umg88naauq6ppidvitf@4ax.com>,
Chris <neuroflow@hotmail.com> wrote:
>There are overseas companies that sell cigarettes through the Internet
>to American customers legally for roughly 25% of the price most people
>pay in the s
|
|
|
Is anyone aware of the current status of Raich v. Ashcroft?
It is the medical marijuana case in the 9th Circuit.
Dick
|
