Legal Spring Logo

"Why would I go anywhere else for Legal Services?"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
Commercial use of artwork from foreign (Cuban) trademarks



gmp@adres.nl (Hua Kul)
4/18/2004 7:53:43 AM


(Note to moderator: The email on my post header is no longer operable
but I use it to log in to Google. A good current email is
huaREMOVEkul@hotmail.com. If you require posters to this group to
register at Google with their good email I will. Otherwise I will
just use my good one in the body of my posts.)
I would like to market a product in the US that would picture some
classic Cuban cigar bands. I have several questions about this and
would appreciate input.
1. Can I do this legally without a license from the Cuban company?
2. Would it be technically illegal but without any way for a Cuban
company to touch me in a US court?
3. Would it even be legal for me in the US to enter into a license
agreement with a Cuban company?
3. If the original trademark/copyright owner fled Cuba and is
producing products with the same design in, say, the Dominican
Republic, would I need to obtain a license from him, even if the label
I want to use is different than anything he produced outside of Cuba
(e.g., the Cuban label would have the word "Habana" on it)?
Thanks for any input.
--Hua Kul
huaREMOVEkul@hotmail.com
 
 
brotbacken@hotmail.com (Fred Richards)
4/20/2004 8:38:26 PM


gmp@adres.nl (Hua Kul) wrote
I would like to market a product in the US that would picture some
classic Cuban cigar bands. I have several questions about this and
would appreciate input.
1. Can I do this legally without a license from the Cuban company?
2. Would it be technically illegal but without any way for a Cuban
company to touch me in a US court?
3. Would it even be legal for me in the US to enter into a license
agreement with a Cuban company?
3. If the original trademark/copyright owner fled Cuba and is
producing products with the same design in, say, the Dominican
Republic, would I need to obtain a license from him, even if the label
I want to use is different than anything he produced outside of Cuba
(e.g., the Cuban label would have the word "Habana" on it)?
You should consult a U.S. lawyer, particularly about whether your use
would infringe on a U.S. trademark held by a Cuban company. This
issue was just addressed in a federal court case, decided a few weeks
ago, in which a Cuban (government-owned) cigar company successfully
prosecuted a tradememark infringement suit against a U.S. company that
was selling cigars under a famous trade name owned (and registered in
the U.S.) by the Cuban company.
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1080681913225. So, in spite of
the fact that a trademark is owned by a company in an
ostensibly-hostile country, or even by the government of that country,
a U.S. court will apparently enforce it.
As for licensing with the Cuban company, the Trading with the Enemy
restrictions on doing business with Cuba and Cuban companies is pretty
broad, and probably excludes U.S. citizens licensing Cuban
intellectual property rights in the U.S. See, e.g. 31 CFR 515.201, et
seq.
As for the question of the ex-pat Cuban company in the D.R., here,
too, you should consult a lawyer. He may well have trademark rights
in the U.S., and in the event that his trademark/trade dress is
similar to that of the Cuban company (as is true of several cigar
brands made both in Cuba and elsewhere), you may well be infringing on
the U.S. rights of _both_ companies.
In short, consult a lawyer who specializes in trademark law; he'll be
familiar with the issues raised by your project.
FR
 
 
horrigan@aol.com (Horrigan)
4/21/2004 9:30:16 PM


I would like to market a product in the US that would picture some
classic Cuban cigar bands. I have several questions about this and
would appreciate input.
I see a couple of potential hassles aside from the obvious one (i.e., the fact
that you are infringing on the Cuban cigarmakers' trademarks.)
Hassle #1: The US government might think you are doing business with Cuba.
You would basically be expected to prove that you are using the trademarks
without compensations. That means you would have to prove that you are
infringing on the trademarks.
Hassle #2: There is a good chance that there are Cuban expatriate here in the
US who think they own the trademarks. You could definitely get sued by
descendants of the pre-Castro owners of the cigar factory... The issue of
property rights is one of the main reasons why we haven't made piece with Cuba.
All the property left behind by Cubans who feld the country was seized by the
state, and in most cases is now owned by someone else. But the US government
takes the position that this property rightfully belongs to the the original
refugees and restoring this property is a necessary condition for making peace
with the Castro regime.
*****
Tim Horrigan <horrigan@aol.com>
*****
 
 
sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart)
4/23/2004 3:07:03 PM


In article <rs7e80ttmkb2dr2rn7gacgf3gssis1935i@4ax.com>,
Horrigan <horrigan@aol.com> wrote:
I would like to market a product in the US that would picture some
classic Cuban cigar bands. I have several questions about this and
would appreciate input.
I see a couple of potential hassles aside from the obvious one (i.e., the fact
that you are infringing on the Cuban cigarmakers' trademarks.)
Don't those trademarks apply to cigars? What if he marketed posters?
Cigar boxes? Coffee-table books?
Hassle #1: The US government might think you are doing business with Cuba.
You would basically be expected to prove that you are using the trademarks
without compensations. That means you would have to prove that you are
infringing on the trademarks.
That assumes validity. Anyway, not taking any sort of tax deduction
for paying for use of the trademarks should suffice here (absent proof
otherwise).
Hassle #2: There is a good chance that there are Cuban expatriate here in the
US who think they own the trademarks. You could definitely get sued by
descendants of the pre-Castro owners of the cigar factory...
If they aren't marketing stuff using the trademarks, then they've let
the trademarks lapse.
Seth
 
 
Report this post for offensive content


site map |  disclaimer |  privacy
All Rights Reserved, Legal Spring, Inc. 2004