|
|
I got my driving previlegies revoked in NJ for 30 days (as of today),
but since i'm PA licensee I'm expecting NJ MYS to send PennDOT the
information, then PennDOT is going to evaluate it, process it, and
send me a suspension notice (most likely for 3 m
|
|
|
Hi. I've a question. I parked my car on the street. I came back the next
day to find another car wedged up my rear bumper. I called the insurance
company and they told me to call the cops. I did, cops came and tried
telling me that I'm wasting my
|
|
|
"Barry Gold" <bgold@nyx.net> wrote in message
news:9tl8f09rqorg9r1pan3cclrbk7lrismj24@4ax.com...
> Or there may be something useful in a Nolo Press book, often found in
> your local library. I'd rather rely on Nolo Press than on the typical
> forms
|
|
|
A few years back, my fiance took out a student loan for a trade school
program. Her career path didn't pan out, and now she's faced with a
$9000 student loan. She's barely able to pay the rent, so even small
payments on the loan are impossible. What a
|
|
|
Me wrote:
> Are there any Calif limits on the percentage of
> royalties in lieu of hourly fees that an entertainment
> lawyer might be allowed to contract for when setting
> up a license agreement?
There used to be (and may still be) a limit that
|
|
|
"ganson" <jackerman@wowway.com> wrote in message
news:5ul8f0tbq4i27jqg83dtgcsie7fnndihr1@4ax.com...
>Will I be able to offer this service on my own
> as a freelance paralegal without working under an attorney?
>
How will you do it without offerin
|
|
|
"ptsc" <ptsc@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:3ul8f0hvdr3g8kp2mge86t3aae0btpmifk@4ax.com...
> >How about if someone posted a newsgroup article that included the
> >list of links to Scientology which Google had removed? How about
> >if Dan Rathe
|
|
|
Barry Gold wrote:
> Stuart Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>
>>Then you may not be able to remove her from any part of the
>>trust that became irrevocable when your father died. Instead
>>you may have to go to court to get her removed
|
|
|
In article <jj36f09joqmjnh7g6vpundi1qk3ofaq15k@4ax.com>,
John F. Carr <jfc@mit.edu> wrote:
>Being hit from behind while stopped is an excuse for hitting
>the car ahead in Massachusetts case law (Buda v. Foley,
>19 N.E.2d 537 (Mass. 1939)) but I thin
|
|
|
"Barry Gold" <bgold@nyx.net> wrote in message
news:lul8f0ht4u5ljfkm2fie74g1o1fff9s8bu@4ax.com...
> TheMage <them_age@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >I've asked similar questions to this one on hand-work newsgroups,
and
> >no one could answer this one for s
|
|
|
"TheMage" <them_age@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:kn36f0lu4s2gklugojvun4jd9lp4jpah92@4ax.com...
> Let's say I saw a web page with instructions for a(crafts) crochet
> *technique* (not a pattern for an article of clothing, but an actual
> techn
|
|
|
>
> >
> > The only actions I am considering at this point are:
> > 1. Write courteous letter to Nissan Direct, and to the service manager
> > at the local dealer explaining the problem and asking for
> > reimbursement
> > 2. Filling out small claim
|
|
|
On 13/7/04 22:48, in article qul8f0pe4gl3bhnm9i8c4gsg45fuuda4b8@4ax.com, "J.
Arlen Pruitt" <z@d.com> wrote:
> You are correct, in Texas an adopted child can inherit from both her natural
> and adoptive parents. The child's natural parents (whose pare
|
|
|
"ganson" <jackerman@wowway.com> wrote in message
news:5ul8f0tbq4i27jqg83dtgcsie7fnndihr1@4ax.com...
> I recently probated my late uncle's estate as the executor. He had
a
> very simple estate and I decided to see if I could do the probate
work
> my
|
|
|
"Carol A Maderer" <camaderer@eastex.net> wrote in message
news:em36f0pvtbhkjfai9f0lf245nmpqaho0kp@4ax.com...
> "Arcadian Rises" <arcadianrises@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:ckf0f01vkgh7f0rehm76ia3lncpa4acran@4ax.com...
> > You expect us to advi
|
|
|
patti <pattimbergin@aol.com> wrote:
>Well shoot Barry, if this is how it is, if a person is not "allowed"
>tests due to advanced age shouldn't the doctors just flat out lean
>over the desk and say something like "Bernice, your spitting up blood,
>but
|
|
|
>"Brandon" <bnd-66@cox.netthefish> wrote:
>>When a speed limit is posted as XXmph in a "work zone" as well as the normal
>>speed limits(signs are not covered) which applies.
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>Leaving aside the reality
|
|
|
bgold@nyx.net (Barry Gold) wrote in message
news:<lul8f0ht4u5ljfkm2fie74g1o1fff9s8bu@4ax.com>...
> TheMage <them_age@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >Furthermore, since the author is now hurting my sales by providing
> >their own instructions for this technique
|
|
|
Michael Jacobs wrote:
>
> mexicanonegro@hotmail.com (Enrique) wrote in message
> news:<pm36f01imriq4kune4304b8hsguaks3eof@4ax.com>.....
> > The
> > settlement offered will release the punk who injured my family and he won't
> > have to pay a penn
|
|
|
I live in downstate Illinois. A builder is building a house next door
to mine. When they did the excavation for the foundation, they piled
a lot of the dirt over the property line into my yard, killing the
grass. I was also unable to use that part o
|
|
|
>When a speed limit is posted as XXmph in a "work zone" as well as the
normal
>speed limits(signs are not covered) which applies.
> Is there a valid argument that one can correctly drive the higher of the
>posted limits, especially if there are no wo
|
|
|
jackerman@wowway.com (ganson) wrote in
news:5ul8f0tbq4i27jqg83dtgcsie7fnndihr1@4ax.com:
> I recently probated my late uncle's estate as the executor. He had a
> very simple estate and I decided to see if I could do the probate work
> myself withou
|
|
|
Pete from Boston <masspete@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:<nul8f0htnuemucdpc374qdvrp9u5cop3bc@4ax.com>...
> Bill Mitchell wrote:
> > I remember those signs on most if not all of the Interstates in
> > Connecticut back in the late sixties/early
|
|
|
Pete from Boston wrote:
>
> Bill Mitchell wrote:
> > chesler@post.harvard.edu (David S Chesler) wrote in message
> >
> >>that read "Private Way - Pass At Your Own Risk" came down. [Related
> >>question, did that sign have any legal consequences?
|
|
|
>>>>> On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 17:48:10 -0400, ptsc ("ptsc") writes:
>> Wouldn't that be the same as saying that the following
>> passage could be copyrighted?
>> "On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 15:36:01 -0400, Seth Breidbart
>> wrote something in misc.
|
|
|
I have been contacted by the current "owner" of my childhood home
which I would like to purchase. The issue I have is that the person
who contacted me cannot sell me the property outright because both her
and her grandfather are on the deed and she ca
|
|
|
Hi,
My friend and I want to form an independent film company,
its first project being a finalized script we wrote. We
want the company to meet certain objectives including:
1 - Having an attractive environment for outside investors.
Yes
|
|
|
Stan Brown wrote:
> I don't know about Arizona (your state), but in Ohio a few years
> back there was a court ruling that if it says "work area" the fines
> are doubled regardless of whether there are any workers.
I suspect that's the exception
|
|
|
ganson wrote:
<snip>
> I am exploring the possibility
> of seeing if I could offer services to others who have an estate to
> probate but may not want to pay the expense of an attorney. I realize
> that probates can be much more complex than tha
|
|
|
In article <0ul8f09s1lvo7ooqbsp986c9ntk7kphitn@4ax.com>, Tam
<tamsuraiya@yahoo.ca> writes:
>
>On 12/7/04 23:27, in article on36f09p3dufue1skv5rm21sl8g6omm0mt@4ax.com,
>"Nell" <subscribe@blarg.net> wrote:
>
>> There was a case in Oregon where a man
|
|
|
In article <4k36f01jrm8av38cdl4qotsetp64rk1jik@4ax.com>, mjacobslaw@comcast.net
(Michael Jacobs) writes:
>
>In USA, the adoption process legally severs the parental-filial bond
>between the biological parents and the child, and places the adoptive
|
|
|
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 17:48:12 -0400, jackerman@wowway.com (ganson)
wrote:
>I recently probated my late uncle's estate as the executor. He had a
>very simple estate and I decided to see if I could do the probate work
>myself without an attorney. Whe
|
|
|
In article <ej36f0lk2fv2e7mlu305hlf1htj2aeu87a@4ax.com>,
John David Galt <jdg@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> wrote:
> > John David Galt <jdg@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> wrote:
> >> The general rule is the same as if it were a store parking lot or the
> >>
|
|
|
In article <nl36f0houip05qnl5fr6qlbomssrt2kr21@4ax.com>, "Paul Cassel"
<paul1@abq.com> writes:
> You can't do so [change name] to escape legal obligations or in
>other words to defraud someone or something or of course as you know, to
>escape crimi
|
|
|
> > I-86 in
> > Connecticut, before it became I-84, that said "Road under
> > construction -- Pass at Your Own Risk" -- any consequences?]
> >
>
> I remember those signs on most if not all of the Interstates in
> Connecticut back in the late sixti
|
|
|
>When a speed limit is posted as XXmph in a "work zone" as well as the normal
>speed limits(signs are not covered) which applies.
In Texas there are some signs that say "traffic fines double when
workers are present". I don't think the speed limit a
|
|
|
A couple of years ago, as a result of job loss and other financial
issues, I was forced to quit paying on a credit card as things like
food and shelter took priority. About a year after my default, I
attempted to contact the card issuer to work out a
|
|
|
>>>>> On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:24:37 -0400, Scott Hedrick ("Scott") writes:
Scott> In Florida, transactions involving real estate- like, say, a LEASE, must
be
Scott> in writing to be enforced. In general, depending on the specific reason
she
Scott>
|
|
|
This is a reminder about the misc.legal.moderated policy on
submissions containing munged headers such as
From: biff@willy.NOSPAMloman.org
1. Posters are free to munge headers (leaving aside forgeries in the
name of an actual third party). Spammer
|
|
