|
|
Robert Bonomi wrote:
> In article <8i0791hs5b6jq1pqi52dqj0eeu136uslld@4ax.com>,
> nym9 <nymphetamine@mail.com> wrote:
> >
> >Here is my point about that: When parties own a property, they are
> >entitled to an equal share of the rental income.
>
>
|
|
|
Hi, I was hoping that someone here could help me or at least point me in the
right direction.
My divorce was final after 15 years of marriage. It was final Feb 14,2003 in
the Harris County Texas family court. We used his lawyer which I later
|
|
|
In article <1s5991d8gsomkk1oosc4rbgso16lquuek6@4ax.com>,
"888eight888" <bz811@go.com> wrote:
> This past May, New York has had some freakishly cold, winter-like
> temperatures. For example, today is May 25, 2005 at 8:30 AM and the
> temperature out
|
|
|
On 25 May 2005 11:21:14 -0400, "888eight888" <bz811@go.com> wrote:
> [T]oday . . . May 25, 2005 at 8:30 AM [in New York
> City] the >temperature outside is 47 degrees. In this
> situation, when the heat in a residential building is
> usually cut of
|
|
|
In article <kp5991115efehg47e51n5f7rbsj8crq4jd@4ax.com>,
"nyzach" <nyzach@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 2.If I recorded on tapes that they promised to give it back to me
> in there months, dose that mean i can be worry free, and that the
> tape can be used a
|
|
|
On Wed, 25 May 2005 11:21:12 -0400 Alex <alex@aitchison8.freeserve.co.uk>
whittled these words:
> I can't afford a solicitor and have written to my neighbours, who have
> now let the property to tenents who are intending to buy the property.
> The t
|
|
|
In article <ip5991ddjdhlpq2oj9ppeddcud0l1seaov@4ax.com>,
Alex <alex@aitchison8.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>Their deeds state that 'they must not open any window, apature or other
>opening below first floor level in the wall' but this has been ignored.
|
|
|
Alex writes that his neighbors are venting exhaust gas through holes in
a party wall. The neighbors have threatened to sue him if he blocks
off the holes, which would have been my first inclination.
One wonders, what would be the consequences of mak
|
|
|
"Mark James" <mj9287@charter.net> wrote in message
news:rh0791pig59ra2k032psu8po75lp3brre4@4ax.com...> I have been divorced for
about 3 years and we had a Discover card account
in
> her name and I was an authorized user. Since I had made most of the
|
|
|
Hello,
I'm working on a documentary television series about the wrongly
convicted. The series, entitled Was Justice Denied? is being developed
for our national broadcaster, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation,
and will be distributed in Canada, th
|
|
|
Hello all. Im presently a post-doctoral fellow at the NIH. I have a PhD
and by all accounts a prestigious fellowship. My wife is a lawyer. I
have of late become fascinated with the possibility of getting involved
in IT (my current project involves phar
|
|
|
Bernie,
You wrote:
>I was reading that it is illegal [in the US at least] to jam cell
> phones. Why is that?
Jamming involves radio signals which intentionally interfere with other
radio signals. The FCC in the US controls the radio w
|
|
|
Bernard Cosell <bernie@rev.net> wrote:
: I was reading that it is illegal [in the US at least] to jam cell
: phones. Why is that? Do I have some legal obligation *NOT* to
: prevent radio signals from coming onto my property? [I'm one of the
: folk
|
|
|
Bernard Cosell wrote:
> I was reading that it is illegal [in the US at least] to jam cell
> phones. Why is that? Do I have some legal obligation *NOT* to
> prevent radio signals from coming onto my property? [I'm one of the
> folk that find cell ph
|
|
|
In article <bp5991dgcqcqtsifri0rvbsilekn47gpu6@4ax.com>,
Bernard Cosell <bernie@rev.net> wrote:
>I was reading that it is illegal [in the US at least] to jam cell
>phones. Why is that?
Because the law *says* it is illegal,
Operating a transmi
|
|
|
Bernard Cosell wrote:
> I was reading that it is illegal [in the US at least] to jam cell
> phones. Why is that? Do I have some legal obligation *NOT* to
> prevent radio signals from coming onto my property? [I'm one of the
> folk that find cel
|
|
|
In article <bp5991dgcqcqtsifri0rvbsilekn47gpu6@4ax.com>,
Bernard Cosell <bernie@rev.net> wrote:
>I was reading that it is illegal [in the US at least] to jam cell
>phones. Why is that?
Because jamming cell phones requires broadcasting on their
fr
|
|
|
In article <bp5991dgcqcqtsifri0rvbsilekn47gpu6@4ax.com>,
Bernard Cosell <bernie@rev.net> wrote:
> I was reading that it is illegal [in the US at least] to jam cell
> phones. Why is that?
Because cell phone service is provided on radio frequencie
|
|
|
On Wed, 25 May 2005 11:21:09 -0400, Bernard Cosell <bernie@rev.net>
wrote:
>I was reading that it is illegal [in the US at least] to jam cell
>phones. Why is that? Do I have some legal obligation *NOT* to
>prevent radio signals from coming onto my
|
|
|
"Bernard Cosell" <bernie@rev.net> wrote in message
news:bp5991dgcqcqtsifri0rvbsilekn47gpu6@4ax.com...
> I was reading that it is illegal [in the US at least] to jam cell
> phones. Why is that? Do I have some legal obligation *NOT* to
> prevent rad
|
|
|
Bernard Cosell <bernie@rev.net> writes:
> I was reading that it is illegal [in the US at least] to jam cell
> phones. Why is that?
In the US, it's illegal to interfere with the radio spectrum,
which is controlled by the federal government as a pub
|
|
|
Bernard Cosell <bernie@rev.net> wrote:
>I was reading that it is illegal [in the US at least] to jam cell
>phones. Why is that? Do I have some legal obligation *NOT* to
>prevent radio signals from coming onto my property? [I'm one of the
>folk that
|
|
|
>I was reading that it is illegal [in the US at least] to jam cell
>phones. Why is that? Do I have some legal obligation *NOT* to
>prevent radio signals from coming onto my property? [I'm one of the
It is illegal to transmit radio signals with the
|
|
|
lauralynnee wrote:
> Hi, I was injured on a treadmill at the Marriott hotel due to a
> treadmill malfunction. (the technician had to replace multiple parts I
> was told) I was in pain for about 2 weeks and had bursitis on both of
> my knees. I also re
|
|
|
On Wed, 25 May 2005 11:21:06 -0400, Stan Brown
<the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>>Is there a source that tells, state by state, what's allowed and what's
>>not?
>
>No, not by state. There is a FEDERAL law, the Telephone Consumer
>Protection Act
|
|
|
wabky wrote:
> I am redoing my will and I am looking for a little advice.
>
> In the case where both my wife and I die, we will be leaving an estate
> of about $1M to our two girls, 32 and 14.
Trying to do something as complex as what you are propo
|
|
|
In article <vo5991l3l8b42aupqgd0nu2hleitu0vsv7@4ax.com>,
wabky <wabky@yahoo.com> wrote:
>I am redoing my will and I am looking for a little advice.
>
>In the case where both my wife and I die, we will be leaving an estate
>of about $1M to our two gir
|
|
|
"wabky" <wabky@yahoo.com> wrote:
> In the case where both my wife and I die, we will be leaving an
> estate of about $1M to our two girls, 32 and 14. I am sure
> daughter 32 would spend the money (500K)with abandon while my
> daughter 14 will need
|
|
|
On Wed, 25 May 2005 11:21:04 -0400, "Konstantinos" wrote:
>Do you think that domain names can be considered as a property right?
>If so how do you justify it? There are conflicting decisions and as far
>as I am aware only in the US.
It is meaningl
|
|
