|
|
In article <hfc9a19ntkj04lhljlltqaragibi4nno7q@4ax.com>,
"G Wheelock" <gwheelock@comcast.net> wrote:
> My question is this - is it legal to effectivly change the deed by changing
> the definition upon which the deed was
> originally based (it almos
|
|
|
"G Wheelock" <gwheelock@comcast.net> wrote:
> My question is this - is it legal to effectivly change the deed
> by changing the definition upon which the deed was
> originally based (it almost sounds equivalent to changing the
> definition of "foot"
|
|
|
In article <7fc9a1hgefjsh56m92f7lerg7piei0ko9f@4ax.com>,
<christinebarry@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I am researching the elected position of Prosecuting Attorney at the
>county level in Michigan. I'd like to know what the legal
>requirements are
|
|
|
I made the mistake of being distracted from the essential logic of
my thread [while fly-swatting the posters/trollers who added their
own facts].
I speculate that:
* rules and settled principles have a purpose/context,
* which is often obvious
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote:
>Steve Pope <spope33@speedymail.org> wrote:
>>Not generally. The reporter owns the rights in the transcript,
>>and avoids "work for hire" situations.
>What rights, specifically? If the reporter makes a t
|
|
|
sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
> Steve Pope <spope33@speedymail.org> wrote:
>>Robert Bonomi <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com> wrote:
>
>>>On what basis do you believe it to be "unethical"? The
>>>reporter produced a "work done for hire" -- as s
|
|
|
llan Adler wrote:
> It is not constitutional to have a law saying that a certain person
> or a certain category of people are not allowed to have an income.
Huh? Do you have examples of what you're talking about?
Does this have anything to do wi
|
|
|
Allan Adler <ara@nestle.csail.mit.edu> wrote:
> It is not constitutional to have a law saying that a certain
> person or a certain category of people are not allowed to have
> an income. It is constititional to say that whoever happens to
> have mon
|
|
|
Bernie Cosell <bernie@fantasyfarm.com> wrote:
Before reading my comments, I am not a user of illegal drugs
and I beleive th penalty for drug dealing should be sexual
sterilization via a ,45 caliber gun.
> GONZALES V. RAICH (03-1454)
Willie and
|
|
|
Chris wrote:
> We live near an old air force base that was closed in the '60s and one
> night, my son with some friends decided to explore some of the
> abandoned buildings in search for answers to some of the questions he
> and his friends have had f
|
|
|
Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@comcast.net> wrote:
>I doubt your son could make a credible statement that he did not know a
>closed military base was still considered government property and that
>any entrance past a closed gate could be considered trespass
|
|
|
More than three quarters of law firms in the United States have a
website for good reason:
The internet is the world's largest source of information. It has
become the most important source of current information for users -
the primary place they
|
|
|
Hello
I have couple of credit card accounts to which I havent paid even the
min payments for around 2 years now. I have got few mails from the
collection agencies but didnt do anything about them since I didnt have
a job and couldnt afford to do a
|
|
|
Den wrote:
>
> I have a checking account that is currently in my sole name, that I would
> like my wife to have full access to, that is for both or either of
> independently to be able to take any action on the account.
>
<snip>
> Is ther
|
|
