|
|
Stuart A. Bronstein wrote:
> Prof Reid <reid@cse.msu.edu> wrote:
>
>
>>How much power of asset distribution can be passed to
>>someone via a will?
>
>
> Basically, none. The answer is different for a trust.
>
But what if the will said "I
|
|
|
I have a quick query really.
My name is Mr Spiers, and I want to aquire Spiers.com for my family for
obvious reasons (homepages, email addresses, etc).
The domain is currently owned by netidentity.com who offer isp services
over hundreds (probably
|
|
|
I don't know how to title this thread.
Someone has a book that is reprinted from a book 3 or 400 years old.
IIUC, the copyrights on the book have expired -- it's in the public
domain -- but the choice of typefonts and the arrangement of
paragraphs
|
|
|
In article <8v1ea15lf51qla42ldk2u0dhv8jpmnt35f@4ax.com>,
<rbb@earthlink.datafoundry.com> wrote:
>I live in a rented house in California. I was denied the use of
>certain amenities specified in my lease for the first year of a 3 year
>lease. I'vre pol
|
|
|
My son was paying child support through a county agency. The mother
moved out of the county and the county informed my son of the closing
of the case. The IRS even returned the tax money withheld for support
for "reversal" of the case. This was five ye
|
|
|
news@absamail.co.za wrote:
>
> Here's another unrelated case which needs consideration of
> the 'purpose of the principle':
> [Foss & Harbottle] principle why the courts [used to] don't provide
> protection to a minority share-holder is:
> " they
|
|
|
Robert Bonomi wrote:
<SNIP>
>>
>>>What rights, specifically? If the reporter makes a transcript of my
>>>words, then _I_ own the copyright.
>>
>>I suppose you may own the copyright, but the reporter has not
>>only the right, but the legal obliga
|
|
|
bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi) wrote:
> Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>>sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
>
>>> What rights, specifically? If the reporter makes a transcript
>>> of my words, then _I_ own the c
|
|
|
Mike Jacobs wrote:
> Allan Adler wrote:
>
>>It is not constitutional to have a law saying that a certain person
>>or a certain category of people are not allowed to have an income.
>
>
> Huh? Do you have examples of what you're talking about?
|
|
|
Jeff wrote:
> I am a new independent contractor, and have signed a 2000 hour contract
> with a company.
>
> The contract is half way through, but recently new stipulations have been
> put in place that extends my relationship beyond that of an indepe
|
|
|
Jeff,
You had a contract as an independent contractor to do work for a small
company. You clearly were failing to meet their expectations (as detailed in
the e-mail), and they attempted to impose certain rules to improve your work
habits. You
|
|
|
In article <uu1ea191rd6kh82prgoant4flh0uuh15tu@4ax.com>,
Jeff <jeff@cheapbeer.net> wrote:
> Any advice on what I should do? It was a well paying contract I would
> like to continue working, on the basis of an independent contractor.
Yes...learn
|
|
|
Jeff <jeff@cheapbeer.net> wrote:
> I am a new independent contractor, and have signed a 2000 hour
> contract with a company.
>
> The contract is half way through, but recently new stipulations
> have been put in place that extends my relationship
|
|
|
In article <su1ea15l75el3fnflugha2s0v19hc4ge7i@4ax.com>,
A Michigan Attorney <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote:
>Dolllazzz@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> I booked at a Canadian hotel through their "Best Rate" on their
>> website. I cancelled less than 24 hours la
|
|
|
"A Michigan Attorney" <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dolllazzz@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> I booked at a Canadian hotel through their "Best Rate" on their
>> website. I cancelled less than 24 hours later as I decided on
>> a different destination. When
|
|
|
"Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
> rdadams@smart.net (Dick Adams) wrote:
>
>>> GONZALES V. RAICH (03-1454)
>
>> What is surprising is that Willie, Sandra, and Clarance were
>> the dissenters in this 6-3 vote against medical mar
|
|
|
On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 11:00:11 -0400, "John A. Weeks III"
<john@johnweeks.com> wrote:
>In article <il9ca1lvigab3jsgfkqpt2r11nmamqspun@4ax.com>,
> "vicky" <forumtalks@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> I have a job now and I want to repay and fix my credit rating
|
|
|
caj11@my-deja.com wrote:
> vicky wrote:
>
>>Hello
>>
>>I have couple of credit card accounts to which I havent paid even the
>>min payments for around 2 years now. I have got few mails from the
>>collection agencies but didnt do anything about the
|
|
|
In article <mu1ea1d3clr3v594l37q5ik6i69nm1n9us@4ax.com>,
<caj11@my-deja.com> wrote:
>vicky wrote:
>>
>> I have couple of credit card accounts to which I havent paid even the
>> min payments for around 2 years now. I have got few mails from the
>> c
|
|
|
vicky wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have couple of credit card accounts to which I havent paid even the
> min payments for around 2 years now. I have got few mails from the
> collection agencies but didnt do anything about them since I didnt have
> a job an
|
|
|
Daniel R. Reitman wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 11:22:44 -0400, Gary Goodman <XgaryXg7X@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>The rules in the US vary by state. Some states use the "Prudent Man"
>>rule which is more restrictive as to the investments allowed.
|
|
|
On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 11:00:10 -0400, "digger o'dell"
<diggerodell@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>From my limited experience, neighbors do have
>some undeniable rights to trim the tree branchs
>at the point where they cross the property
>line.
>
>But are th
|
|
|
"digger o'dell" <diggerodell@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:gu1ea11vho1pn3rpfo7qff5cehjv0vn07i@4ax.com...
> Can I legally prevent his from stepping foot
> on my property to do his dirty deeds?
He shouldn't have to step on your property in order
|
|
|
> Familiar situation where neighbor claims that
> branch from my tree is partially shading his
> garden. Removing the limb which overhangs
> property line would utterly destroy the tree's
> beauty.
>
>>From my limited experience, neighbors do have
|
|
|
The question is, is the initial receiver of this information numerous
years ago required to report this comment, or guilt of any crime having
heard the comment but having said nothing to anyone to date about the
comment, or obligated to make any type
|
|
