|
|
Prof Reid wrote:
> How much power of asset distribution can be passed to
> someone via a will?
>
> For example:
>
> Can X's Will say, "I leave everything to Y, and Y has
> absolute discretion as to how things are distributed."
>
> Could thi
|
|
|
sebspiers@gmail.com wrote:
<problem with domain name and possible cyber squater>
The process for resolving cybersquating is found here:
http://www.icann.org/udrp/
This is an administrative process, not a legal one.
Hope that helps!
|
|
|
sebspiers@gmail.com wrote:
> I have a quick query really.
>
> My name is Mr Spiers, and I want to aquire Spiers.com for my family for
> obvious reasons (homepages, email addresses, etc).
>
> The domain is currently owned by netidentity.com who
|
|
|
sebspiers@gmail.com wrote:
> ....
>
> Is there anything I can do via legal channels to aquire this domain as
> they seem to be rather unwilling to sell it at anything other than
> ridiculous prices.
>
> ...
The short answer is No.
The longe
|
|
|
>On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 21:06:04 -0400, sebspiers@gmail.com wrote:
>I have a quick query really.
>
>My name is Mr Spiers, and I want to aquire Spiers.com for my family for
>obvious reasons (homepages, email addresses, etc).
>
>The domain is currently
|
|
|
On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 21:06:04 -0400, sebspiers@gmail.com wrote:
>My name is Mr Spiers, and I want to aquire Spiers.com for my family...
>The domain is currently owned by netidentity.co...
>Is there anything I can do via legal channels to aquire this d
|
|
|
regimunNOSPAM@yahoo.com wrote:
> I don't know how to title this thread.
>
> Someone has a book that is reprinted from a book 3 or 400 years old.
>
> IIUC, the copyrights on the book have expired -- it's in the public
> domain -- but the choice of
|
|
|
In article <5qpha1ddicae14rftmh4ofqrj87s10faga@4ax.com>,
<regimunNOSPAM@yahoo.com> wrote:
>I don't know how to title this thread.
>
>Someone has a book that is reprinted from a book 3 or 400 years old.
>
>IIUC, the copyrights on the book have expir
|
|
|
On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 21:06:03 -0400, regimunNOSPAM@yahoo.com wrote:
>Someone has a book that is reprinted from a book 3 or 400 years old.
>
>IIUC, the copyrights on the book have expired -- it's in the public
>domain --
Correct. The rules about w
|
|
|
dr d wrote:
> My son was paying child support through a county agency. The mother
> moved out of the county and the county informed my son of the closing
> of the case. The IRS even returned the tax money withheld for support
> for "reversal" of the
|
|
|
Dr D,
Your son is divorced or separated and has children. There was a support
agreement at one time which was enforced by a County government. The mother
and children moved to another County. Your son stopped paying child support
for some rea
|
|
|
In article <7v1ea1piupc2r427m60j9vh9ahoc5v91i1@4ax.com>,
A Michigan Attorney <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote:
>> My most specific is, are candidates for this position required to be
>> members of the Michigan Bar?
>
>As you are aware, a person must be
|
|
|
In article <vppha15l2ts4napfqivqng8m4fspbvvd6p@4ax.com>,
John Hyde <EJhyd@netscape.net> wrote:
>Robert Bonomi wrote:
><SNIP>
>
>>>
>>>>What rights, specifically? If the reporter makes a transcript of my
>>>>words, then _I_ own the copyright.
>>>
|
|
|
In my original posting, I asked whether there was any constititional
or other legal ground for the ilegallity of the existence of people
who are not allowed to get paid. This caused a certain amount of
confusion. For example, "Stuart A. Bronstein" <s
|
|
|
>Uh, I don't think he said anything about "work." Just about getting
>"Paid". Perhaps I am reading too much in, but I find these questions to
>be quite a curiosity. Before I spend too much time thinking about this,
>I'd like the OP (Original Post
|
|
|
I live in Michigan using Consumers energy as a gas provider at an
apartment complex. Recently the apartment complex installed meters so
tenants should pay for their own gas...fine. All we have to pay for
is heat. The hot water is paid for by the ap
|
|
|
First of all, I am amazed at the variety of responses. Particularly the
ones that make assumptions about character of the OP. But there is a
real legal issue about whether there is an employee or contractor
relationship.
Jeff wrote:
> I am a n
|
|
|
In article <nppha1drfu203jum4nqakrlonleql1s8ar@4ax.com>,
John A. Weeks III <john@johnweeks.com> wrote:
>In article <uu1ea191rd6kh82prgoant4flh0uuh15tu@4ax.com>,
> Jeff <jeff@cheapbeer.net> wrote:
>
>> Any advice on what I should do? It was a well pa
|
|
|
"Jeff" <jeff@cheapbeer.net> wrote in message
news:uu1ea191rd6kh82prgoant4flh0uuh15tu@4ax.com...
> Having not met these new requirements, I have been given a contract
> termination notification, given the following clauses in the contract:
> Any ad
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart wrote:
> In article <su1ea15l75el3fnflugha2s0v19hc4ge7i@4ax.com>,
> A Michigan Attorney <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Dolllazzz@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> I booked at a Canadian hotel through their "Best Rate" on their
> >> websit
|
|
|
> I booked at a Canadian hotel through their "Best Rate" on their
> website. I cancelled less than 24 hours later as I decided on
> a different destination. When I confirmed with the hotel, they
> informed me that the hotel charge was non-refundable.
|
|
|
> GONZALES V. RAICH (03-1454)
[snipped]
> Of particular relevance
> here is Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111,
> 127-128, where, in rejecting the appellee farmer's
> contention that Congress' admitted power to regulate the
> production of wheat for c
|
|
|
>
> Contact the credit card companies, and ask what your balance is and who
you should pay the bill to. If the card company still holds the debt, then
you may be able to cut some deal.
When you contact to make a deal. make sure ALL interest and pen
|
|
|
On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 21:05:31 -0400, John Hyde <EJhyd@netscape.net>
wrote:
>Daniel R. Reitman wrote:
>> Maybe, but why would any estate last nine years without extenuating
>> circumstances? In Oregon, the courts ask for an explanation at 12
>> mo
|
|
|
James RR wrote:
> A person joins a large police force, tells an acquaintance he can't
> wait until he "kills his first <slang for a specific ethnic person>".
> The person to whom this was told blew the comment off.
>
> Numerous years later at a reun
|
|
|
Dave wrote:
> The question is, is the initial receiver of this information numerous
> years ago required to report this comment, or guilt of any crime having
>
> heard the comment but having said nothing to anyone to date about the
> comment, or obl
|
|
|
James RR wrote:
> A person joins a large police force, tells an acquaintance he can't
> wait until he "kills his first <slang for a specific ethnic person>".
> The person to whom this was told blew the comment off.
Presumably because the hearer thou
|
|
|
In article <2ppha15eostcfo514ill3kaspkoek5osdq@4ax.com>,
Dave <dland@mytrashmail.com> wrote:
>The question is, is the initial receiver of this information numerous
>years ago required to report this comment, or guilt of any crime having
>heard the com
|
|
|
|
|
