|
|
fredvig@comcast.net wrote:
> She made the huge mistake of doing this deal without a lawyer (against
> my advice)
Since you're asking for guidance on her future course of action, isn't
it premature to bemoan her acting without a lawyer in her past
|
|
|
MintTbird wrote:
> At the date of my legal separation on 1/4/2004, I had say, $10,000, in
> my 401(k). On 2/6/2004 my employer contributed $15,000 to my 401(k)
> account. The divorce is final, thank God!, but his attorney is saying
> that he's entit
|
|
|
In article <vt1qf1d13qtehlis899sfk5lmd359pp0bd@4ax.com>,
<c0@earthlink.net> wrote:
>Switching from TV to a Radio inspired questions...
>I was channel surfing and hit an amusing "one of those" <right of
>conservative> talk shows on the way back from
|
|
|
c0@earthlink.net wrote:
> Switching from TV to a Radio inspired questions...
> I was channel surfing and hit an amusing "one of those" <right of
> conservative> talk shows on the way back from work, where a caller
> claiming to be an attorney sugg
|
|
|
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:46:18 -0400, c0@earthlink.net wrote:
>Switching from TV to a Radio inspired questions...
>I was channel surfing and hit an amusing "one of those" <right of
>conservative> talk shows on the way back from work, where a caller
|
|
|
ddl@danlan.*com (Dan Lanciani) wrote:
>
> This seems to say that parents can never inherit from their
> children except by virtue of being descendants of prior
> generations who are not then alive, but that grandparents can
> inherit directly from th
|
|
|
Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>Daniel Ganek <ganek@comcast.net> wrote:
>> I'm not sure what a "real estate broker" is. Do you mean a
>> realtor? They disappear once the PSA is signed.
>The word "realtor" is a trademark of th
|
|
|
Ill try to make an insane, byzantine family problem as succinct as
possible and would appreciate a response from anyone with legal
knowledge.
I've been designated the executrix of my mother's estate. Mom is alive
but possibly seriously unwell (un-s
|
|
|
In article <mt1qf1pva16i31bctb2rv53ev6onan3tn3@4ax.com>,
A Michigan Attorney <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote:
>Robert Bonomi wrote:
>
>> _SOME_ (at one time it was 'virtually all') states have a statutory
>requirement
>> that employees be paid *IN*CASH
|
|
|
In article <kt1qf110555v5s9lc2nl172ko2rons6fln@4ax.com>,
Mark A <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>"Robert Bonomi" <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com> wrote in message .
>>
>> _SOME_ (at one time it was 'virtually all') states have a statutory
>> requirement
>
|
|
|
"Andy" <andysharpe@juno.com> wrote:
> I suspect that if one put all their money into a
> homestead, and then did a "quit claim" to one's heirs
> reserving a LIFE ESTATE, that would make it
> judgement proof, since the property has been effectively
|
|
|
Creditor has a monetary judgment against Debtor. Creditor causes a
Writ of Garnishment to be served on a bank in which Debtor has
non-exempt funds which are insufficient to satisfy the judgment in
full. Between the time that the bank is served and th
|
|
|
In article <ft1qf1tb48ik4jqtfhmmo3ije2s8tnokpi@4ax.com>,
Jonathan Sachs <xxxxxxx@earthlink.not> wrote:
>On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 07:57:42 -0400, bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com
>(Robert Bonomi) wrote:
>
>>In addition, the latest round of "modifications" -- t
|
|
|
"Jonathan Sachs" <xxxxxxx@earthlink.not> wrote in message
news:ht1qf1ljl9s4fvmhki8dott48n25elkj4v@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 07:57:42 -0400, "PTravel"
> <ptravel@travelersvideo.com> wrote:
>
>>Fair use determinations can not be made by looki
|
|
|
In our state [Minnesota], it is considered an illegal discrimination to
expel or deny enrollment into an educational institution if the reason is
among a number of protected parameters (sex, color, age, etc.).
I signed up, paid and attended a sess
|
|
