|
|
Gordon Burditt wrote:
>
> 1.2? As in 1.2%? I thought typical legal limits were in the range
> of 0.03% to 0.10%, and 1.2% was pretty dead and embalmed.
> (www.intox.com/physiology.asp lists "dead" as 0.45%+ and the upper
> range for "comatose" at
|
|
|
In article <v743j1l1be8v5dq6lctr1hnu6cl2t1416g@4ax.com>,
Dick Adams <rdadams@smart.net> wrote:
><rexdtripod@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Have a friend who hit a 1.2 at a police checkpoint in NJ. First
>> offense. Some have said don't bother with a lawy
|
|
|
Gordon Burditt wrote:
> >Have a friend who hit a 1.2 at a police checkpoint in NJ. First
> >offense. Some have said don't bother with a lawyer because a 1.2 is a
> >1.2. No chance for mitigation or a not guilty verdict.
>
> 1.2? As in 1.2%? I
|
|
|
>Some have said don't bother with a lawyer because a 1.2 is a
>1.2. No chance for mitigation or a not guilty verdict.
I will assume you mean "0.12" which is pretty high. DUI is a serious
offense. Even if you think you have no chance--- ahem, I mea
|
|
|
<tpatsch@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:s743j1523c4he689hknvblk1jkn5dl6r0n@4ax.com...
> Have a friend who hit a 1.2 at a police checkpoint in NJ. First
> offense. Some have said don't bother with a lawyer because a 1.2 is a
> 1.2. No chance for
|
|
|
In article <s743j1523c4he689hknvblk1jkn5dl6r0n@4ax.com>, tpatsch@gmail.com
wrote:
> Have a friend who hit a 1.2 at a police checkpoint in NJ. First
> offense. Some have said don't bother with a lawyer because a 1.2 is a
> 1.2. No chance for miti
|
|
|
In the case of divorcing spouses in Texas, when does the
community generally end?
On the date they stop living together? Must there be a
"legal separation" if this is the case? Or is just no longer
living together sufficient to end the community?
|
|
|
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:58:17 -0400 in misc.legal.moderated,
favored us with...
> I got a follow-up email from the realtor who wants to sell the
> cigarette-smoke and tar-nicotine-soaked home. He said (and I quote)
> "It is against the law to discri
|
|
|
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:58:17 -0400, pennsylady2002@yahoo.com wrote:
>I got a follow-up email from the realtor who wants to sell the
>cigarette-smoke and tar-nicotine-soaked home. He said (and I quote)
>"It is against the law to discriminate against
|
|
|
>A debt remains forever until paid or forgiven. Even a bankruptcy discharge
>doesn't eliminate the debt, just the legal right to enforce collection.
Hypothetical situation: you open a charge account with my business,
buy $1000 in widgets, then decla
|
|
|
"Mike Jacobs" <mjacobslaw@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:p643j15qa51a2ub4t9po9lvgcbutane480@4ax.com...
> PTravel wrote:
>> <datakoll@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:n6gei197pvret7vap9i3vnutoth29ufo0v@4ax.com...
>> > federal court asks for
|
|
|
Here is my dilema. Joe owns properties A and B. B is landlocked. The
ONLY way into B is through property A. Joe sells property B to Mike.
The property is sold without any warrenties (the sales contract
specifically in BOLD says AS/IS) and no mentio
|
|
|
olks:
It promises to be a most interesting year at the Supreme Court, and not just
because the composition of the Court is changing. Here at the LII, we are
giving
our attention to what the Court is saying as well as to the question of who will
|
|
|
===========================================================
Oral argument previews:
Prepared by the liibulletin editorial board:
< http://www.law.cornell.edu/bulletin/05board.htm >
=============================================================
|
|
