|
|
Looking for info, case law, etc, re why the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
is not used on defective new houses, i.e., why are houses not a product
under the act. Please post to the board...i can't check email often.
Thanks in advance for any info.
|
|
|
In article <97gei1lc6tgh0alacsojqlpvba19m966sd@4ax.com>,
Barry <barry@polisource.com> wrote:
>People who didn't get out after the mandatory evacuation are at fault.
>They should have saved enough money
How much money are people _required_ to have,
|
|
|
dameunaayuda@yahoo.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My sister's husband of 30 years died suddenly. He had always taken care
> of all financial matters. After his death, much to my sister's
> surprise, she discovered that he had put almost everything they th
|
|
|
In article <p5dik1hhl7pk3fg55oa7n2t21ann1t03fc@4ax.com>, jknight4@qwest.net
(John Knight) writes:
| Dan Lanciani wrote:
[...]
| > An interesting question might be: could the original poster have structured
| > his contract for the original work s
|
|
|
Stu said:
>It might depend on which state you're in. In California it is
>pretty much prohibited to deduct things like this from an
>employee's pay check, even if it is a legitimate debt.
It is pretty much universal, however, that employers are N
|
|
|
In article <3j1ek1957d626bph5op7ugk6h8ece04ds0@4ax.com>,
Rich Carreiro <rlcarr@animato.arlington.ma.us> wrote:
>"Stuart A. Bronstein" <spamtrap@lexregia.com> writes:
>
>> But if he was on a diagonal to you the radar may have given an
>> incorrect a
|
|
|
In article <i5dik1hdh606csluvuumpup1gt4e340g2p@4ax.com>,
David Chesler <chesler@post.harvard.edu> wrote:
>Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
>> begin quotation
>> from David Chesler <chesler@post.harvard.edu>
>> in message <3q06k1du6g2kacqtr70bgfnjo0n9r4djrd@
|
|
|
prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
> Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>
>> There is no constitutional prohibition against using illegally
>> acquired evidence. In the case of violations of the 4th
>> Amendment of the Constitution, th
|
|
|
In article <si1ek11031u01rhj93u1jfue7sq6dhg2de@4ax.com>,
Jeff Wisnia <jwisnia@conversent.net> wrote:
> Has Federal law governing junk faxes changed so that it is now legal to
> send unsolicited faxes to unrelated businesses as long as a no-cost
>
|
|
|
From a legal non-political perspective, what's the significance if any
of a person being called before a grand jury for a 4th time? I'm
reading various reviews about Karl Rove's adventure, and you get
completely different perspectives on what mult
|
|
|
reneap@hotmail.com wrote:
[$400 worth of gift certificates he got from employer before he quit /
moved out of state were claimed by another. Issuer says it's not to
blame but former employer is]
>
> At this moment I am contemplating some type of l
|
|
|
In article <35dik1ltdrl82npdf1b1tj6ak0d04mbjv5@4ax.com>,
reneap@hotmail.com wrote:
> At this moment I am contemplating some type of legal action to receive
> what is rightfully mine. I am not sure of what the best route is: Theft
> police report? s
|
|
|
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:19:58 -0400 Timothy <horrigan@aol.com> whittled these
words:
> Chad said:
>> B is landlocked. The
>>ONLY way into B is through property A.
> Hmm, just to add on to my other post. The only way this stipulation
> could be
|
|
|
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:19:58 -0400 Timothy <horrigan@aol.com> whittled these
words:
>> Joe owns properties A and B. B is landlocked. The
>> ONLY way into B is through property A. Joe sells property B to Mike.
>> The property is sold without any wa
|
|
|
On 8 Oct 2005, news@absamail.co.za trivially repeated still again:
> > [ Is there ANY potential prejudice to a person who
> > witnessed the signing of a document which, after the
> > signing, the principals thereto alter in some material
> > way? ]
|
|
|
Dennis G. Rears wrote:
> What is a Deminimis motion?
>
> dennis
Without some context, it's hard to tell what you're asking about. The
term "de minimis" (it's 2 words) means "concerning a trifling or
miniscule amount" and comes from the Latin phra
|
|
|
My landlord says they have given permission to the cable company, Cox,
to enter my apartment to upgrade their infrastructure. I have never
been a customer of Cox or any other cable company. I have never
signed any contract with Cox or any other cable
|
|
|
Doug wrote:
> If a will names a bank as executor, what does it take to change it to a
> relative if the heirs all agree?
>
You'll need the bank to agree to resign in favor or whoever you all
have chosen to act as executor.
-paul
ianal
|
|
|
In article <u4dik11fd3o8fuvjltmoqikfdsekb9honv@4ax.com>,
"Doug" <anothername@access4less.net> wrote:
> If a will names a bank as executor, what does it take to change it to a
> relative if the heirs all agree?
Petition the judge for a change in e
|
|
|
> It seems to me the "weasel words" allow a
> security deposit to be withheld for almost any
> reason (in my case for a "rental fee" amounting
> to 1/2 months rent).
Well, a "rental fee" is not a "security deposit" in any
normal sense of the words.
|
|
