|
|
One of my friends is working in the library. Recently, she received a
complaint from a teen patron. That patron borrowed a viedotape and paid
three dollars. But the patron's account still shows that he has three
dollars unpaid. He said the librarian wh
|
|
|
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 19:02:15 -0400, "Danny No Spam"
<Do.not.spam.me@no.way> wrote:
>Does anyone know the rules/standard for bringing witnesses to a mediation
>hearing? I am looking to get custody of my 13 year old autistic son because
>I think I
|
|
|
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 19:02:14 -0400, frippletoot@hotmail.com wrote:
>Looking for info, case law, etc, re why the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
>is not used on defective new houses, i.e., why are houses not a product
>under the act. Please post to the bo
|
|
|
frippletoot@hotmail.com wrote:
> Looking for info, case law, etc, re why the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
> is not used on defective new houses, i.e., why are houses not a product
> under the act. Please post to the board...i can't check email often.
|
|
|
On 12 Oct 2005, frippletoot@hotmail.com wrote:
> Looking for info, case law, etc, re why the Magnuson-Moss
> Warranty Act is not used on defective new houses, i.e., why
> are houses not a product under the act. * * * Thanks . . .
The usual s
|
|
|
frippletoot@hotmail.com wrote:
> Looking for info, case law, etc, re why the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
> is not used on defective new houses, i.e., why are houses not a product
> under the act. Please post to the board...i can't check email often.
|
|
|
<frippletoot@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cc5rk1dgnugvun2tjrsqh4dgbcvpa4sgdn@4ax.com...
> Looking for info, case law, etc, re why the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
> is not used on defective new houses, i.e., why are houses not a product
> under t
|
|
|
In a previous message, Stuart A. Bronstein wrote:
> It will largely depend on what state she lives in. She may be able
> to get control over a portion of the property in the trust. See a
> local probate lawyer who might have experience with divorc
|
|
|
I've sold my house. The buyers signed in the purchase agreement that
they will assume the alarm monitoring contract at $32 per month. The
alarm equipment was left in the home for them. The contract runs
another 2 1/2 years. They have now told the alarm
|
|
|
I have a restraining order against me in the state of California and
would like to know what forms the "protected" would need if they agree
to remove the order. Not that they couldn't get them from the court
house I would just like to have them handy.
|
|
|
ddl@danlan.*com (Dan Lanciani) writes:
> Can a bank structure its account agreement such that it can appropriate a
> customer's deposits in satisfaction of otherwise unrelated debts that the
> bank believes are owed to it by the customer?
I think
|
|
|
Consider the following:
// =================================================================
//
// Copyright (C) 2001 Mikhael Brown
//
// ----------------------------------------------------------------
// This software is provided 'as-is', w
|
|
|
John F. Carr wrote:
> In article <i5dik1hdh606csluvuumpup1gt4e340g2p@4ax.com>,
> David Chesler <chesler@post.harvard.edu> wrote:
>> This is true. But the sign doesn't say "No parking unless you're
>>using the hydrant." (I'm waiting until you invoke
|
|
|
Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
> prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
>> Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@lexregia.com> wrote:
>>
>>> There is no constitutional prohibition against using illegally
>>> acquired evidence. In the case of v
|
|
|
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 19:01:58 -0400, "Danny No Spam"
<Do.not.spam.me@no.way> wrote:
>. . . . I was told only "hungry"
>lawyers accept refundable retainers. . . .
I would question that representation.
Daniel Reitman
|
|
|
This is a reminder about the misc.legal.moderated policy on
submissions containing munged headers such as
From: biff@willy.NOSPAMloman.org
1. Posters are free to munge headers (leaving aside forgeries in the
name of an actual third party). Spammer
|
|
|
Seeking general advice:
My hubby and I are exemplary tenants of 10+ yrs of our apartment
complex,
having lived through six management company changes. The current company, which
took over the complex in June, thought little of our spotless histor
|
|
|
D.F. Manno wrote:
> In article <si1ek11031u01rhj93u1jfue7sq6dhg2de@4ax.com>,
> Jeff Wisnia <jwisnia@conversent.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Has Federal law governing junk faxes changed so that it is now legal to
>>send unsolicited faxes to unrelated busine
|
|
|
>In general, how much politics are in federal grand jury operations?
Some, I suppose. Certainly there is office politics involved: a
prosecutor who gets indictments is going to be promoted more often than
one who doesn't. And it's especially impres
|
|
|
On 12 Oct 2005, c0@earthlink.net wrote:
> From a legal non-political perspective, what's
> the significance if any of a person being calle
> before a grand jury for a 4th time?
That some combination of one or more members of the grand jury with
t
|
|
|
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 19:01:47 -0400 in misc.legal.moderated, Paul
Cassel favored us with...
> Best advice is to drop it. There isn't enough money involved to make it
> worth pursuing. ... What you can almost
> be sure of is that either party will bl
|
|
|
<reneap@hotmail.com> wrote:
> STATE:Florida
>
> I worked for a call center company which outsourced call
> attending services for a reknown online travel company.
>
> As part of the sales incentives $100-$400 +/- were offered for
> sales agents
|
|
|
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 19:01:36 -0400 in misc.legal.moderated, Mike
Jacobs favored us with...
> A long line of Supreme Court
> cases has established that e.g. in a claim that the treatment of a
> prisoner in custody amounts to cruel and unusual punishme
|
|
|
"Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@KeithLynch.net> wrote in
news:eb5rk119f6u9imj3op5vhiu50sflct01rd@4ax.com:
> My landlord says they have given permission to the cable company, Cox,
> to enter my apartment to upgrade their infrastructure. I have never
> been a
|
|
|
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 19:01:34 -0400 in misc.legal.moderated, Keith F.
Lynch favored us with...
> My landlord says they have given permission to the cable company, Cox,
> to enter my apartment to upgrade their infrastructure. I have never
> been a cus
|
|
|
In article <eb5rk119f6u9imj3op5vhiu50sflct01rd@4ax.com>,
"Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@KeithLynch.net> wrote:
> My landlord says they have given permission to the cable company, Cox,
> to enter my apartment to upgrade their infrastructure. I have never
>
|
|
|
"Doug" <anothername@access4less.net> wrote in message
news:u4dik11fd3o8fuvjltmoqikfdsekb9honv@4ax.com...
> If a will names a bank as executor, what does it take to change it to a
> relative if the heirs all agree?
If the heirs all agree, there is
|
|
|
shoppa@trailing-edge.com wrote:
> Well, a "rental fee" is not a "security deposit" in any
> normal sense of the words. Usually the rental fee
> is known by all parties to be completely nonrefundable.
In California nonrefundable "rental fees" are
|
|
|
I was recently involved in a car accident. It was 100% the fault of
the other driver. The bill came out to $4,600 and their insurance
company paid the whole thing. The problem is that my 2004 car was
worth about $15,000. Since the bill was over 25%
|
|
