misc.legal.moderated

"Mike Jacobs" <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote in message news:pvp9n1d4jjjao0ferc9g2gpa4k9iv5vj5l@4ax.com... > IMHO the main reason it is that way is purely economic. If a civil > defendant (in an uninsured matter) doesn't have enough money to pay a

Lesley547@hotmail.com wrote: > I had a horrifying experience at the hands of doctors and staff at a > hospital recently and my attorney tells me I have a good case. I have > never sued anyone before and I am very fearful that my entire life will > be

Lesley547@hotmail.com wrote: [scared of being deposed] Anyone in this group ever > testify as a plaintiff in this type of case? I'd like to know what the > experience is like, and whether it is as terrible as I imagine. Thanks. > You nee

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 13:51:58 -0500 from <Lesley547@hotmail.com>: > > I had a horrifying experience at the hands of doctors and staff at a > hospital recently and my attorney tells me I have a good case. I have > never sued anyone before and I am very

On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 13:51:54 -0500, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote: >That sounds a like like you're trying to testify to the "that" clause. I'm not sure whether the above is to be taken as serious or not. >You can ask "Are you aware o

c0@earthlink.net wrote: > A group is initiating a petition to put an action up for referendum. A > counter group has indicated they will enlist 100's of people to sign the > petition with false information, in hopes of preventing enough > verifyiab

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 13:51:53 -0500 from <c0@earthlink.net>: > That seems like dirty pool to me, so I have to wonder if it's legal to > intentionally provide false information on a petition document. No, of course it's not. But I doubt that the penalti

On 11 Nov 2005, Michael Benveniste <mhb-offer@clearether.com> wrote: >Quoting from the recently decided (but unpublished) case of >Floyd A. Wright vs. Sylvia Ruth Weeden (California 3rd >appellate district, Super. Ct. No. 69462: > > Although a rea

> Quoting from the recently decided (but unpublished) case of > Floyd A. Wright vs. Sylvia Ruth Weeden (California 3rd > appellate district, Super. Ct. No. 69462: > > Although a reasonable attorney would have known this appeal > was utter

In article <hvp9n11l5ocak580u8l4guccas7jn41o9j@4ax.com>, Michael Benveniste <mhb-offer@clearether.com> wrote: > Quoting from the recently decided (but unpublished) case of > Floyd A. Wright vs. Sylvia Ruth Weeden (California 3rd > appellate distric

Paul Cassel <pcasselplus2@comcast.net> wrote: > Understand this: the stuff you see on TV about technicalities and smart > courtroom tricks NEVER occurs in real life. I mean it - NEVER. > -paul > ianal Not being a lawyer, you shouldn't talk so fa

On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 13:51:43 -0500, fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote: > >ebgujm wrote: >> On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 15:42:48 -0500, "george pearl" >> <geopearlst@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >me in on a lil' "secret" they had--the truck was badly damaged 12 yea

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 13:51:38 -0500 from Joe Versaggi <JOEMVCNJ@att.net>: > According to the New Jersey 2002 Home Ownership Act, charging a fee for > a Payoff quote or provide release upon prepayment is prohibited. > There is no escrow, PMI, nor prepaym

Titus Barik wrote: > > If I steal your car, you're out of a car. If I 'steal' your music, you > still have your music. The difference is that the second is infinitely > repeatable and duplicatable, and yes, this changes the dynamics of what > is 't

Titus Barik <titus@barik.net> wrote: > mm wrote: >> In many places where I said "crime", I was perhaps only referring to >> civil copyright infringement. Morally, I think, and I think most >> people agree with me, that it is the same as any other the

On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 13:51:16 -0500, "Martin" <0_0_0_0_@pacbell.net> wrote: >I belong to a private industry email list. The list administrator and >myself have had some disagreements... At one point, he took one >of my private emails, modified it

cbreitel wrote: > Mike Jacobs wrote: > > > > I'm not sure I follow your logic. Yes, the PC or LLC structure will > > shield the partners and/or sole principal owner of the corporation from > > individual liability (and exposure to loss of personal

Mark Shaw wrote: [edited question] > > My supervisor, who is an officer of the corporation, has directed > that I interview no candidates who are not US citizens - no Green > Cards, no H1-B visas, nobody but natural-born or naturlaized > citizens

In article <lup9n11v719lqnti1qgva51qipluufbb3v@4ax.com>, Mark Shaw <mshaw@bangnetcom.com> wrote: > >My supervisor, who is an officer of the corporation, has directed >that I interview no candidates who are not US citizens - no Green >Cards, no H1-B

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 13:51:14 -0500 from Mark Shaw <mshaw@bangnetcom.com>: > My supervisor, who is an officer of the corporation, has directed > that I interview no candidates who are not US citizens - no Green > Cards, no H1-B visas, nobody but natural

<The position itself has no intrinsic citizenship requirement. > You do not know what restrictions have been put upon your employer by Federal contracts, for example, since 9/11. I had to deal with that issue recently, the requirement was burried de

hi all, i am part owner of a software dev company. we had a company happy hour last night to celebrate one of our employees winning an award. about 20 employees went to the local pub, we had drinks and appetizers. Put everything on the company credi

prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote: > IANAL, but I think Stuart may have been thinking about during > trial, where (I believe) it is more restrictive as to what can > be asked but during a discovery (again, I believe) it is very > open as to what can be

kenckar@gmail.com wrote: > This seems like a really trivial issue, but I hope someone can help me. > > Here's the deal: > > My wife and I received a $100 check written to both of us. I was going > out of town and asked her to deposit it into our joi

kenckar@gmail.com wrote: > This seems like a really trivial issue, but I hope someone can help me. > Here's the deal: > My wife and I received a $100 check written to both of us. I was going > out of town and asked her to deposit it into our joint

In misc.legal.moderated Robert Bonomi <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com> wrote: > In article <ol62n15to2nkaqlcgbqocn2rufsh6e9jrh@4ax.com>, > Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote: >>In article <kmdvm19l0anojl0cp6rk8chpp2rupmm6qf@4ax.com>, >>Robert Bonomi

bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi) wrote: > Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote: >>Sure it does: I now have the right to prevent you from doing >>embroidery based on my painting. If I license that right to >>you, I have given up that ri

In California, it is my understanding that charter cities are free manage municipal affairs restricted only by their own charter and by the state constitution. City ordinances supersede state law, other than the constitution, unless a statewide matter

In reading through the statute concerning corporations in my state, I was surprised to see that one chapter listed the items *required* in a corporation's articles. There was only 5 things: name, # of shares, officer names, purpose, registered agent na

In article <6up9n1duqrnnf3rf51ar0if025m211p6g8@4ax.com>, medusa <medusa569@verizon.net> wrote: >> Lets say one of these floating seminar companies come to a state near you >> that you attend, bite the hook ,sign a nice big fat contract for a product >

"medusa" <medusa569@verizon.net> wrote: >> Lets say one of these floating seminar companies come to a >> state near you that you attend, bite the hook ,sign a nice big >> fat contract for a product you never get, nor do you get a >> refund. The con

Last night my son had a car accident and blew .06 on intoxilizer. He was arrested and taken to jail. I don't deny that he made a very big mistake and I am not trying to get him out of paying the consequences of his own actions but I am very afraid th