|
|
Don wrote:
> "Mike Jacobs" <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:pvp9n1d4jjjao0ferc9g2gpa4k9iv5vj5l@4ax.com...
>
> > IMHO the main reason it is that way is purely economic. If a civil
> > defendant (in an uninsured matter) doesn't have eno
|
|
|
In article <qf9fn1t0cnoeh9nl1vqhak5eurqtcp8rps@4ax.com>,
Eric <EricG@ether.net> wrote:
>On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 13:51:54 -0500, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart)
>wrote:
>
>>That sounds a like like you're trying to testify to the "that" clause.
>
> I'm
|
|
|
I don't know if this has been posted here. Please have a look at the
text of the recent Texas constitutional amendment, intended to address
the issue of gay marriage:
NOTE: Entire text posted for completeness, but operative language is
Sec.1 (a
|
|
|
I am having a dispute with a previous landlord in MD over my security
deposit.
I lived in an apartment complex for 2 years and handed them a security
deposit check for $xxx 6 months before I moved in. A few months ago I moved
out and expected the
|
|
|
---------------------------------------------------------------
AN E-BULLETIN
LEGAL INFORMATION INSTITUTE -- CORNELL LAW SCHOOL
lii\@lii.law.cornell.edu
----------------------------------------------
|
|
|
cbreitel wrote:
> Arcadefreaque wrote:
> > If prosection is made aware that the very basis for their claim against
> > the defendant is invalid (in part or in full), but continues to attempt
> > to prosecute the defendant, can the defendant 1) ask f
|
|
|
during a short fight with cancer, my father updated his will, realizing
that his wife, who is riddled with parkinson's, would continue to live
her life at the nursing home. after his death, the two stepsons got
power of attorney over her, under the gu
|
|
|
This is a reminder about the misc.legal.moderated policy on
submissions containing munged headers such as
From: biff@willy.NOSPAMloman.org
1. Posters are free to munge headers (leaving aside forgeries in the
name of an actual third party). Spammer
|
|
|
I live in Texas, if that has any impact on internet legal services.
No, I didn't vote for W.
I just got through having my Homestead Exemption stripped away and
five year of back taxes applied because ten years ago I paid a lawyer
$5 grand to set up
|
|
|
> Legally, this looks to be like a fairly conventional defamation case.
> (Technically it may be called libel, which is simply a defamation that
> is published in written form.)
It's interesting that you think that this falls under defamation rather
|
|
|
This question is for academic interest only - the issue is actually
resolved, quite satisfactorily, but I have questions.
My father-in-law died a while ago in Florida. He had property in
Florida. He, and all heirs, were/are residents of Canada. My
|
|
|
[This followup was posted to misc.legal.moderated and a copy was sent
to the cited author.]
Sun, 13 Nov 2005 15:46:49 -0500 from calberto22 <calberto22
@yahoo.com>:
[After a company-sponsored and -paid party where alcohol was served,
an employe
|
|
|
In article <qe9fn1paricuue8597gtplhpkb0e6leaf1@4ax.com>,
calberto22 <calberto22@yahoo.com> wrote:
{{ about a company party, and a some-time-after-the-party drunk-driving
accident by one of the employees who attended. And asked about the
company's l
|
|
|
calberto22 <calberto22@yahoo.com> wrote:
: hi all, i am part owner of a software dev company. we had a company
: happy hour last night to celebrate one of our employees winning an
: award. about 20 employees went to the local pub, we had drinks and
|
|
|
calberto22 wrote:
[company paid happy hour & then later a participant gets in car crash]
>
> we paid for his health insurance so he's fully covered. we are just
> concered about a lawsuit, we are liable for anything? is there
> anything we should
|
|
|
In article <fup9n1pei58ee383sk4ahvenjjnod0864a@4ax.com>,
Paul Cassel <pcasselplus2@comcast.net> wrote:
>Seth Breidbart wrote:
>>
>> Sure it does: I now have the right to prevent you from doing
>> embroidery based on my painting. If I license that
|
|
|
In article <je9fn1h4urud8orldhbg0ar8k3uv1203oc@4ax.com>,
<prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>In misc.legal.moderated Robert Bonomi <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com> wrote:
>> In article <ol62n15to2nkaqlcgbqocn2rufsh6e9jrh@4ax.com>,
>> Seth Breidbart <seth
|
|
|
Lee Choquette wrote:
> In California, it is my understanding that charter cities are free
> manage municipal affairs restricted only by their own charter and by the
> state constitution. City ordinances supersede state law, other than the
> constitu
|
|
|
Lee Choquette <leec@xmission.com> wrote:
> In California, it is my understanding that charter cities are
> free manage municipal affairs restricted only by their own
> charter and by the state constitution.
I'm not familiar with the difference be
|
|
|
[This followup was posted to misc.legal.moderated and a copy was sent
to the cited author.]
Sun, 13 Nov 2005 15:46:25 -0500 from <johnmolinda@yahoo.com>:
> In reading through the statute concerning corporations in my state, I
> was surprised to se
|
|
|
on 11/13/2005 12:46 PM johnmolinda@yahoo.com said the following:
> In reading through the statute concerning corporations in my state, I
> was surprised to see that one chapter listed the items *required* in a
> corporation's articles. There was only 5
|
|
|
johnmolinda@yahoo.com wrote:
> In reading through the statute concerning corporations in my
> state, I was surprised to see that one chapter listed the items
> *required* in a corporation's articles. There was only 5 things:
> name, # of shares, off
|
|
|
<johnmolinda@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7e9fn11jsiquhng21kh3opcqaq7u6v4v6g@4ax.com...
> In reading through the statute concerning corporations in my state, I
> was surprised to see that one chapter listed the items *required* in a
> corporation
|
|
|
johnmolinda@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> So, for a small home based corp that has 100% of its stock owned by one
> party would a one page articles of incorp with the 5 required items be
> perfectly legal and legit?
Yes. You may wish to expand the purpo
|
|
|
In a house/property foreclosure situation, you usually have the ability
to pay off whatever is owed in missed payments to avoid foreclosure.
What is owed also includes lawyers fees that were necessary to aide in
the foreclosure process.
I am curious
|
|
|
[This followup was posted to misc.legal.moderated and a copy was sent
to the cited author.]
Sun, 13 Nov 2005 15:46:17 -0500 from kefed <kefed@yahoo.com>:
> Last night my son had a car accident and blew .06 on intoxilizer.
>
> I know we need a la
|
|
|
In article <2e9fn1l74022hlcmfffasocfkhpn9hfh29@4ax.com>,
kefed <kefed@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Last night my son had a car accident and blew .06 on intoxilizer....
{{snip}}
>I know we need a lawyer. I am posting here because right now I don't
>know on
|
|
|
kefed <kefed@yahoo.com> wrote:
: Last night my son had a car accident and blew .06 on intoxilizer. He
: was arrested and taken to jail. I don't deny that he made a very big
: mistake and I am not trying to get him out of paying the consequences
: of
|
|
|
kefed <kefed@yahoo.com> wrote:
: Last night my son had a car accident and blew .06 on intoxilizer. He
: was arrested and taken to jail. I don't deny that he made a very big
: mistake and I am not trying to get him out of paying the consequences
: of
|
|
|
kefed wrote:
> I know we need a lawyer. I am posting here because right now I don't
> know one and I'm just hoping someone here has some advice or knowledge
> of the next steps to take. I am just clueless.
If you don't know any lawyers at all, e
|
|
