|
|
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:47:39 -0500 from Mike Jacobs
<mjacobslaw@gmail.com>:
> The middle-income, or even poor, client who has an affirmative claim
> that actually is worth the risk of pursuing, can easily find
> representation from a contingent-fee plai
|
|
|
Lesley547@hotmail.com wrote:
> I had a horrifying experience at the hands of doctors and staff at a
> hospital recently and my attorney tells me I have a good case. I have
> never sued anyone before and I am very fearful that my entire life will
>
|
|
|
In article <rolkn1pkld4g186ucovgthid78vanghj0o@4ax.com>,
Robert Bonomi <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com> wrote:
>In article <qf9fn1t0cnoeh9nl1vqhak5eurqtcp8rps@4ax.com>,
>Eric <EricG@ether.net> wrote:
>>On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 13:51:54 -0500, sethb@panix.com
|
|
|
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:47:35 -0500, John Hyde <EJhyd@netscape.net>
wrote:
>I don't know if this has been posted here. Please have a look at the
>text of the recent Texas constitutional amendment, intended to address
>the issue of gay marriage:
|
|
|
John Hyde wrote:
>
> BE IT RESOLVED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
>
> SECTION 1. Article I, Texas Constitution, is amended by
> adding Section 32 to read as follows:
> Sec. 32. (a) Marriage in this state shall consist only of
> t
|
|
|
John Hyde <EJhyd@netscape.net> wrote:
> I don't know if this has been posted here. Please have a look at the
> text of the recent Texas constitutional amendment, intended to address
> the issue of gay marriage:
> NOTE: Entire text posted for com
|
|
|
> I lived in an apartment complex for 2 years and handed them a security
> deposit check for $xxx 6 months before I moved in. A few months ago I
> moved
> out and expected the deposit to be returned, but the manager of the
> complex
> kept giving m
|
|
|
Joe,
You recently stopped leasing an apartment. According to you the lease
states that the landlord must give notice or return the security deposit
within 45 days from the day of moving or face penalties. Shortly after this
45 day period you w
|
|
|
I have a bit of a strange question, but I wanted to make sure I wasn't
running afoul of the law before I did anything.
I recently lost a friendly wager to my wife. If I'd won, she had to
take my car for its next oil change. Not too bad, right?
Unf
|
|
|
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:47:33 -0500 from Joe <joe@joeblah.com>:
[security deposit with former landlord]
> Basically, they cannot locate my deposit money and asked me to prove they
> cashed the check I gave them over 2.5 years ago. They do not dispute me
|
|
|
Michael Benveniste wrote:
> Quoting from the recently decided (but unpublished) case of
> Floyd A. Wright vs. Sylvia Ruth Weeden (California 3rd
> appellate district, Super. Ct. No. 69462:
>
> Although a reasonable attorney would have known th
|
|
|
Here's are the details of a problem I am currently having:
Last year I purchased a kitchen floor and financed it on a 3rd party credit card
with 6 months deferred interest.
A few days prior to the payment due date, I made an online payment to the
|
|
|
jeffhanson7183@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> Hi, I have a question about not paying my rent for the month. I live in
> a Apartment in NH, and recently i have had a water leak coming from my
> ceiling in the living room. I called right away and it took SEVER
|
|
|
Hi. I have a question to anybody who is up on this stuff. I rent an
apartment in NJ, where state law N.J.A.C. 5:10-5.1 says the landlord cannot
enter without reasonable notice in writing. Well, the other day there was
some kind of state inspector go
|
|
|
lester@flatt.com wrote:
> Are there any good do it yourself legal kits available on the
> internet? I need one that provides details about transferring assets,
> and other actions besides simply filling in the blanks on a document.
Most of them ar
|
|
|
In article <jm62n19ho4m7dr5cs2horg2vqr7rm7nvi2@4ax.com>,
mm <NOPSAMmm2005@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 15:42:43 -0500, Titus Barik <titus@barik.net>
>wrote:
>>violates the DMCA, as
>>it is considered a "copyright circumvention device"
|
|
|
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:47:13 -0500, "Martin" <0_0_0_0_@pacbell.net>
wrote:
>> Legally, this looks to be like a fairly conventional defamation case....
>
>It's interesting that you think that this falls under defamation rather than
>forgery....
|
|
|
thewonderingski wrote:
>
> I am having a problem with an x boyfriend moving out of my house. He
> will not pick up his things. I have changed the locks and everything,
> he is trying to use me as a storage unit. He is living somewhere else
> now, ha
|
|
|
Was all this complication really
necessary, or was the Florida lawyer just being difficult? --newsy
Andy writes:
Lawyers charge by the hour. It takes more hours to do something
in a complicated way than to do something in a simple way.......
|
|
|
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:47:10 -0500 from newsy <newsy@mailinator.com>:
> My father-in-law['s]
> will specified that all assets were to be divided among several
> heirs, in fixed proportions.
>
> When we sold the Florida property, the Florida lawye
|
|
|
newsy wrote:
> This question is for academic interest only - the issue is actually
> resolved, quite satisfactorily, but I have questions.
>
> My father-in-law died a while ago in Florida. He had property in
> Florida. He, and all heirs, were/are res
|
|
|
In article <4olkn1ds7r49ngmqpd83frfncsqgofsd12@4ax.com>,
Robert Bonomi <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com> wrote:
>In article <qe9fn1paricuue8597gtplhpkb0e6leaf1@4ax.com>,
>calberto22 <calberto22@yahoo.com> wrote:
>{{ about a company party, and a some-time-
|
|
|
In article <7olkn1pgbd5brnkua63n1el7st2it92rks@4ax.com>,
newsy <newsy@mailinator.com> wrote:
>His will specified that all assets were to be divided among several
>heirs, in fixed proportions.
>
>When we sold the Florida property, the Florida lawy
|
|
|
Hi all
Property owner hired a new management company. The management company is
instituting a policy stipulating that all window air conditioners must
be removed by "date x" - the date hasn't actually been specified yet.
The reasoning we are given
|
|
|
les_for_ruschard@yahoo.com wrote:
> I know I could just answer, "No I've not posted questions at legal
> newsgroups." But then I might not pass a detector test--if not now,
> then maybe in the future if the technology gets better.
Even if lie d
|
|
|
Stuart A. Bronstein wrote:
>
> At trial you can only ask questions that are relevant to the specific
> cause of action. In discovery you can ask anything "reasonably
> calculated" to "lead to" relevant evidence. Asking for a log of all
> someone'
|
|
|
In misc.legal.moderated Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote:
> In article <je9fn1h4urud8orldhbg0ar8k3uv1203oc@4ax.com>,
> <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>>In misc.legal.moderated Robert Bonomi <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com> wrote:
>>> In article
|
|
|
kenckar@gmail.com wrote:
>
> This seems like a really trivial issue, but I hope someone can help me.
>
> Here's the deal:
>
> My wife and I received a $100 check written to both of us. I was going
> out of town and asked her to deposit it into o
|
|
|
on 11/15/2005 1:46 PM Stuart A. Bronstein said the following:
> johnmolinda@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>
>>In reading through the statute concerning corporations in my
>>state, I was surprised to see that one chapter listed the items
>>*required* in a cor
|
|
|
on 11/15/2005 1:46 PM chrisphiz@gmail.com said the following:
> In a house/property foreclosure situation, you usually have the ability
> to pay off whatever is owed in missed payments to avoid foreclosure.
> What is owed also includes lawyers fees tha
|
|
|
jwelser@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu wrote:
<snip>
> If the wording is whether he has been convicted of a
> crime, then by stalling things out, you can honestly answer yes.
He'd answer "yes"?????????? I'm sure you meant "no", didn't you? :)
I'm not
>
|
|
