|
|
Edward wants to know if Defence A or B is preferable. Here is the sum
total of what he told us about the two strategies:
>Defence A concerns a sign.
>Defence B concerns location.
>
>Would anyone have any thoughts/advice?
Umm, yeah: find a lawye
|
|
|
So my dilemma is whether to use A, B, or A and B.
As solid as A is on its own, I'm concerned that if it doesn't convince
the judge, I won't be able to bring up the power of B, and be limited
to A.
Defence A concerns a sign.
Defence B concerns locat
|
|
|
Edward <EdwardS@sprint.com> wrote:
> I have two different defences (A & B) for a speeding ticket
> that rely on technicalities.
>
> Each one is very solid on its own, A perhaps just slightly
> stronger than B.
> ....
It would be easier to comm
|
|
|
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:00:05 -0500 from Paul Cassel <pcasselplus2
@comcast.net>:
> Medical malpractice is big business which greatly adds to the cost of
> healthcare for all in the United States.
Sorry, but I think that's grossly inaccurate and (to be
|
|
|
on 11/23/2005 5:59 AM cbreitel said the following:
> John Hyde wrote:
>
>>Well, I originally posted what I saw to be a bit of legal humor. But if
>>we are going to be all serious . . .:
>
>
> You posted your query to a moderated legal newsgroup
|
|
|
"cbreitel" <charlesbreitel@yahoo.com> wrote:
> You're entitled to disagree with me. But it is my professional
> opinion as someone with a juris doctorate that a Texas court of
> law would agree with my interpretation and not yours.
Since you appar
|
|
|
bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi) wrote:
> David Chesler <chesler@post.harvard.edu> wrote:
>>Mark Shaw wrote:
>> Mathematically, all systems I know say yes, "A = A".
>
> In law a 'thing' is a _unique_ object. not 'any instance of a
>
|
|
|
I changed my job and a moving company moved my furniture. They
broke the legs of my dinning set chairs. The dinning set is quite
expensive. I ask the moving company to repair the chairs by making
new legs. They refuse and offer to repair the chairs by
|
|
|
Gerald Clough <firstinitiallastname@texas.net> wrote:
> frankie_paige wrote:
> <anip>
>> The judge recently came to the property to do a private investigation.
>> She is hearing both the criminal case and the civil case. Not only is
>> she not remain
|
|
|
I wrote:
> Sat, 19 Nov 2005 11:35:19 -0500 from frankie_paige
> <frankie_paige@yahoo.com>:
> [dispute over use of property surrounding an easement]
> > The judge recently came to the property to do a private investigation.
>
> Your second sentence
|
|
|
L Mehl wrote:
[first right of refusal contract]
>
> Is there a typical name for such a document? Can someone suggest wording or
> tell us where an example document can be found?
>
Just word it lucidly as a letter between parties. Make sure to i
|
|
|
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 08:59:31 -0500 from <datakoll@yahoo.com>:
> are notarized documents a legal necessity for documents mailed to
> parties including the court if the documents are sent with self
> certification?
> can anyone witness a certification tha
|
|
|
"Timothy" <Timothy.Horrigan@alumni.usc.edu> wrote:
> Grant Menzies wrote:
>> Does anyone know where LA county wills are filed? Would this
>> depend on where the decedent's property lay (in this case, in
>> Beverly Hills) or where she died (in Westw
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote:
> In article <trtkl1peeoccrtrkfn9naan81o7fu747jj@4ax.com>,
> <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>>Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote:
>>> If the money is owed, it's a debt. If it isn't owed, there's no ne
|
|
|
sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
> <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>>Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote:
>>If it's owed due to reciept of a prior service/good, it's a
>>debt. If it's in a current exchange, it's not a debt.
>
> What
|
|
|
In article <b8t8o157gm3e2oodaevnurr3g9jdemqsu3@4ax.com>,
<prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>You can copyright the website and you can patent a product or, at times,
>even a manufacturing technique but I don't think you can protect a "way of
>doing
|
|
|
Keith Cochrane wrote:
> I also included on the above mentioned web page and on nearly every
> other webspage of the site, a notation stating basically that I
> reserve any and all rights to the content of the website and anything,
> (including my
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 08:59:13 -0500, bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com
(Robert Bonomi) wrote:
>Depending on the nature of the ideas, you *might* be able to apply for a
>_patent_ -- *but*, I believe, the _PUBLIC_REVELATION_ of the concepts
>involved *befo
|
|
|
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 08:59:05 -0500 from kinfugaku
<kinfugaku@nospam.yahoo.com>:
> I am trying to relocate to anothe city so I accepted an offer from a
> company near by where I want to go. By the time I presented my leaving
> notice to current employer,
|
|
|
[posted and mailed]
kinfugaku <kinfugaku@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
> I am trying to relocate to anothe city so I accepted an offer
> from a company near by where I want to go. By the time I
> presented my leaving notice to current employer, I was t
|
|
|
kinfugaku <kinfugaku@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote:
> I am trying to relocate to anothe city so I accepted an offer from a
> company near by where I want to go. By the time I presented my leaving
> notice to current employer, I was told (threatened, more pr
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 08:59:03 -0500, "cbreitel"
<charlesbreitel@yahoo.com> wrote:
>To clarify, forgery is only a crime in most states when the alleged
>"forgery" takes place in the context of a government document or
>communications to government age
|
|
|
TOTE@dog-play.com wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 15:46:57 -0500 Robert Bonomi <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com>
> whittled these words:
> > If you have a problem with a such a 'restriction' from a superior, the
> > appropriate procedure is to ask the 'hum
|
|
|
Timothy <horrigan@aol.com> wrote:
> subscribe@AshtonNW.com wrote:
>>
>> If you post this position on a site such as Monster be sure to add
>> screening questions. State that US citizenship is required and ask if
>> they are a US citizen. Citize
|
|
|
I am a recently married senior, with moderate assets accumulated over a
lifetime. Neither of us have any children, however I have a number of
nieces and nephews. In the event of my death I would, of course, like to
care for my new wife; but I woul
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 08:58:19 -0500, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart)
wrote:
>Can the fact that Sony violated copyright (using LGPL'd software in
>its rootkit to create .mp3s) be used against Sony when Sony (in the
>guise of the RIAA) attempts to cha
|
|
|
"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message
news:g7t8o15fu8t67ri6uingu3hqrf3p9jng8i@4ax.com...
> Can the fact that Sony violated copyright (using LGPL'd software in
> its rootkit to create .mp3s) be used against Sony when Sony (in the
> guis
|
|
|
jmilligan246@yahoo.com wrote:
[OP's liquor license is being revoked, purportedly due to being caught
selling liquor to a minor.]
> In any case we want to appeal the license revocation. However, we don't
> want to do it in the state because they ar
|
|
|
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 08:58:16 -0500 from <jmilligan246@yahoo.com>:
You have a liquor license, and you've received notice that it's going
to be revoked. You quote a statute (below), and you want to file
directly in Federal court to stop the revocation.
|
|
|
There's a house here, whose owner was convicted of doing some pretty
horrid things. His assets have been given to a trust, which is
supposed to benefit his victims. Now, his house has been sold, and
one of the buyers is a lawyer, described as a trust
|
|
|
"Stan" <stanleykr@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:d7t8o1t5sfosk0gqv8rqbbitqhf21pvgco@4ax.com:
>
> gigi wrote:
>> This is really an urgent request for advice. Here is the situation: A
>> brother and sister jointly own a property in North Carolina. The
|
|
|
The day before Thanksgiving, I was involved in an auto accident. The
police report shows that the other driver was at fault and cited for failure
to yield. My car was totally destroyed and was towed from the scene to a
salvage yard. The damage is mo
|
|
|
on 11/23/2005 5:58 AM Seth Breidbart said the following:
> In article <o0opn117jiukdgfhqlpbp1d1goco20s805@4ax.com>,
> John Hyde <EJhyd@netscape.net> wrote:
>
>
>>In Oregon, you have the right, (in a notice and sale forclosure) to make
>>up the m
|
|
|
================================================
Oral argument previews:
Prepared by the liibulletin editorial board:
< http://www.law.cornell.edu/bulletin/05board.htm >
================================================
CIVIL PROCEDURE, DIVERSIT
|
|
|
|
|
