|
|
I may need to take a fence contractor to Small Claims Court. I paid him 50%
down to have him install a fence. Months later he hasn't installed the
fence, or given me a firm date when he will. He also "can't" refund my
money because of "cash flow
|
|
|
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 10:08:34 -0500, "calberto22"
<calberto22@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Hi everyone, we are looking at buying an office building. It's an "an
>office building of 22,400 Sq. Ft. with a total land fee simple of
>12,260 Sq ft. What does that
|
|
|
calberto22 wrote:
> Hi everyone, we are looking at buying an office building. It's an "an
> office building of 22,400 Sq. Ft. with a total land fee simple of
> 12,260 Sq ft. What does that mean?
"fee simple" is one of the forms of land ownership i
|
|
|
"calberto22" <calberto22@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d9abp1h9rid4473q8prknos1nvf7ff7eug@4ax.com...
> Hi everyone, we are looking at buying an office building. It's an "an
> office building of 22,400 Sq. Ft. with a total land fee simple of
> 12
|
|
|
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 10:08:34 -0500, "calberto22"
<calberto22@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Hi everyone, we are looking at buying an office building. It's an "an
>office building of 22,400 Sq. Ft. with a total land fee simple of
>12,260 Sq ft. What does that
|
|
|
Paul Cassel <pcasselplus2@comcast.net> wrote:
>Here is a tip: pause before answering anything (I do this when in court
>or when being deposed). Do NOT NOT NOT allow yourself to be rushed into
>an answer or worse, a series of rapid fire question / an
|
|
|
In article <ivp9n1hlvhhut4pd4rk679lm2f4ipndfe0@4ax.com>,
<c0@earthlink.net> wrote:
>A group is initiating a petition to put an action up for referendum. A
>counter group has indicated they will enlist 100's of people to sign the
>petition with fal
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
AN E-BULLETIN
LEGAL INFORMATION INSTITUTE -- CORNELL LAW SCHOOL
lii\@lii.law.cornell.edu
-----------------------------------------------
|
|
|
In article <u03ap1pv3m9t1jdogrgl4e6s627e2b9skp@4ax.com>,
TekWiz <Newsgroup@fe-nntp-06.easynews.com> wrote:
>My aunt is the administrator of her late husband's apartment.
Do you mean of his _estate_?
>According to NY State law, I understand that
|
|
|
TekWiz wrote:
> Facts:
>
> My aunt is the administrator of her late husband's apartment.
> According to NY State law, I understand that upon sale, the first $50K
> is her's and the rest would be split equaly between her and her son.
> At the mo
|
|
|
lannie lawson wrote:
> I thought the rules for our 2 computers were pretty clear, no illegal,
> immoral or unethical activities, and we specifically had talked about
> not downloading songs that you didn't buy.
>
> Peer pressure set in and he appare
|
|
|
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 10:08:28 -0500, "lannie lawson"
<llandin@lycos.com> wrote:
>Peer pressure set in and he apparently downloaded Gigabites of material...
>What's the chance
>we're going to get sued, and is there anything we can do to mitigate
>thi
|
|
|
LIIBULLETIN Wednesday December 7 - 2 cases:
1. Lockhart v. U.S. -
http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/04-881.ZS.html and
2. Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp. -
http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/04-1140.ZS.html
--------------------
|
|
|
LIIBULLETIN Wednesday December 7 - 2 cases:
1. Lockhart v. U.S. -
http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/04-881.ZS.html and
2. Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp. -
http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/04-1140.ZS.html
--------------------
|
|
|
>Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>> Huh?? I had not heard that the laws of physics were any different in
>> Europe from those in the United States? Don't drivers in Europe also
>> have a duty to keep an assured clear distance from the
|
|
|
On 2005-12-06 10:08:18 -0500, cstacy@news.dtpq.com (Christopher C. Stacy) said:
> aggravation with his unkind words...
Really; someone comes on your property and gets in your face in a
threatening manner,
and you strike first in self defense befo
|
|
|
Ben S wrote:
<snip to the point>
> In any event, isn't there a code of "fighting words" that justify
> wacking someone who is assaulting
> you? Had I not reacted and took his abuse, I would have been his "boy"
> thenceforth... ?
References to b
|
|
|
In article <e03ap1t24n9kstep3ts0u4mb70jt6vcojn@4ax.com>,
Ben S <ugspam@mindspring.com> wrote:
>In any event, isn't there a code of "fighting words" that justify
>wacking someone who is assaulting
>you?
No. Rather, it may be illegal for him to
|
|
|
"David Martel" <marte005@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Rob,
>
> You are a "member" of an ambulance company. This ambulance
> company holds meetings, which you do not attend, that are
> governed by Robert's Rules of Order. While the meetings are ru
|
|
|
Mon, 05 Dec 2005 22:59:43 -0500 from Rob Simons <invalid@8t.org>:
> 3. The Board destroys ballots after their elections. There is no
> provision in their bylaws that directs this, and Robert's Rules says that
> ballots should be saved and attached to
|
|
|
Hello Everyone,
i am writing this in hope that someone will give me a good advice what
i need to do.
2 weeks ago i had a problem with my car. The engine was shaking not
normally and after that the "Check Engine" light came on. I took my car
to the lo
|
|
|
"Gerald Clough" <firstinitiallastname@texas.net> wrote in message
news:p4guo111p587dlvrfhgrmotkd2t471s97h@4ax.com...
An example is Fatal Attraction,
> the title of two distinctly different films of about the same time, the
> well-known one and ano
|
|
|
tothe6@aol.com wrote:
> I was in an accident with a car i had bought . i have had full coverage
> insurane for 5 years and still going...... But the car i bought i was
> in an accident and did not have car listed under policy. insurance is
> telling m
|
|
|
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 15:08:07 UTC, tothe6@aol.com wrote:
> I was in an accident with a car i had bought . i have had full coverage
> insurane for 5 years and still going...... But the car i bought i was
> in an accident and did not have car listed unde
|
|
|
tothe6@aol.com wrote:
> I was in an accident with a car i had bought . i have had full coverage
> insurane for 5 years and still going...... But the car i bought i was
> in an accident and did not have car listed under policy. insurance is
> telling m
|
|
|
<tothe6@aol.com> wrote:
> I was in an accident with a car i had bought . i have had full coverage
> insurane for 5 years and still going...... But the car i bought i was
> in an accident and did not have car listed under policy. insurance is
> telli
|
|
|
"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message
news:003ap1tnvmeufsjvd4535jgvsh7avn7f9e@4ax.com...
> That might depend on the reason he alleges the state did; for
> instance, if it were in violation of his civil rights (maybe some
> state emp
|
|
|
In article <tv2ap1tv66utieohk5m00i8jh5mqfmnukj@4ax.com>, John A. Weeks III
says...
>
>In article <d4guo1lcorc97r20fgdiqrc5294dvqpnmm@4ax.com>,
> bregent <regent@dontspamme.newsguy.com> wrote:
>
>> I feel that the bank is responsible for my incurred
|
|
|
Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> "Stan" <stanleykr@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I've also heard at least one case where the at-fault driver didn't
>> know what to do. He was sued in Small Claims Court, I guess
>> didn't tell his i
|
|
|
On 2005-12-06 10:07:51 -0500, Jim <jym@gmail.com> said:
> You made a serious mistake by using a weapon and having it on video tape
Please see the previous posts...
The only view on he tape is on my property with a blur at the end and no pix
of
|
|
|
In article <c4guo1pvlsvpkn122e31sih7ajeiopsei9@4ax.com>,
Stan <stanleykr@hotmail.com> wrote:
>I've also heard at least one case where the at-fault driver didn't know
>what to do. He was sued in Small Claims Court, I guess didn't tell his
>insurance
|
|
|
On 2005-12-05 22:59:29 -0500, "John A. Weeks III" <john@johnweeks.com> said:
> It is clouding
> your judgement and preventing you from seeing that it is wrong
> to beat up an neighbor with a club and suing everyone in sight.
This is not what happe
|
|
|
On 2005-12-05 22:59:23 -0500, "Gary Walker" <twf@swbell.net> said:
>
> Either I missed it, or you don't say if the DA has returned
> an indictment against you? Assuming you're in a state that
> issues indictments from a Grand Jury process, and you'
|
|
|
On 2005-12-05 22:59:27 -0500, "Mike Jacobs" <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> said:
> Plenty of innocent people get convicted if the evidence against them
> points to a conclusion of guilt even though that conclusion of guilt
> may be completely wrong -- surely
|
|
|
In article <jv2ap1d1m6vekkuiqqopph8dvrltapp9k5@4ax.com>,
Gary Walker <twf@swbell.net> wrote:
>Then, I'd sit and wait for my GD session, where I'd pre-
>sent my testimony/recorded evidence. On my GD day,
>I'd be on my best behavior, keep my testimony
|
|
|
In article <fv2ap11n55rvmrbe2mug8u0dqo3bnjm7r9@4ax.com>,
David Chesler <chesler@post.harvard.edu> wrote:
>Stuart A. Bronstein wrote:
>> bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi) wrote:
>>>In law a 'thing' is a _unique_ object. not 'any instance
|
|