|
|
"invntrr" <invntrr@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:k97cq1l1n8kv08aca6d63cqavb5h6ulcvp@4ax.com...
> Because I'm suing my employer under the Whistle blowers protection act.
> I had exception employee evaluations until blowing the whistle on toxic
>
|
|
|
"Lou Leciejewski" <garfield@anet.com> wrote in message
news:tvutp1hu4jrkclnnmtl9dslk86kvsnf5u4@4ax.com...
> I live in the State of Illinois and my Wife is the Executor for her Parents
> Estate. Someone told me that if you are the executor of an Estat
|
|
|
I forgot the term for when a condemned person is set free if the means
of execution fails.
I don't think that is one of the cases double jeapordy. Is it?
Bear with me, folks. After almost 30 years abroad, I speak English like
a pidgeon.
The qu
|
|
|
Timothy wrote:
> Well, I guess I stand corrected. I mistakenly failed to realize
You didn't "fail to realize." You simply don't know trademark law.
Nothing wrong with that, unless you start giving people advice about
trademark law.
> that
|
|
|
"Timothy" <Timothy.Horrigan@alumni.usc.edu> wrote:
> Well, I guess I stand corrected. I mistakenly failed to realize
> that the existence of an identical trademark in Japan is of NO
> significance WHATSOEVER, and thence there is NO chance of legal
|
|
|
Traffic Stop Scenario (Sunday morning 18 December 2005 approx 2:00am)
in Pennsylvania:
Vehicle driven by over-21 driver (with one over-21 passenger) has
burnt-out bulb; local police trooper pulls vehicle over and provides
driver with warning citat
|
|
|
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:41:48 -0500, "Timothy"
<Timothy.Horrigan@alumni.usc.edu> wrote:
>> And that is simply wrong.
>>
>> The purpose of United States trademarks is to prevent confusion as to the
>> source of goods or services used in commerce _in_
|
|
|
I own a 1/6 interest in about 100 acres of Texas land. There are about
20 owners of the remaining percentages of the land, so doing much with
it is difficult. Some years ago, I proposed selling some timber, but
the group was unable to reach a consensus
|
|
|
I have a customer that I think will file for bankruptcy within the next
month. Are there any steps we can take now, before the bankruptcy
(probably chapter 11) is filed?
For example, could we file UCC statements on items we have sold to the
compan
|
|
|
You do *not* want to discuss this in person, it can easily escalate to
violence, especially with the kind of hothead you have described.
Stick to written or telephone communications. If you are unsure what
to say, ask a lawyer to write the letter. Yo
|
|
|
In article <k97cq1l1n8kv08aca6d63cqavb5h6ulcvp@4ax.com>,
"invntrr" <invntrr@verizon.net> wrote:
> The law firm of Swindler Berlin then scanned the internet for all my
> postings, They found a posting I sent from home on my computer where I was
>
|
|
|
invntrr,
You are involved in a "whistleblowing" case with your former employer.
The employer has hired a law firm which has diligently searched the
internet for postings which may be used to suggest that you have
mental/emotional problems. Y
|
|
|
invntrr wrote:
> The law firm of Swindler Berlin then scanned the internet for all my
> postings, They found a posting I sent from home on my computer where I was
> depressed about a weight issue.
>
> They then sent a copy of the posting to The De
|
|
|
In article <k97cq1l1n8kv08aca6d63cqavb5h6ulcvp@4ax.com>,
invntrr <invntrr@verizon.net> wrote:
>Because I'm suing my employer under the Whistle blowers protection act.
>I had exception employee evaluations until blowing the whistle on toxic
>waste ....
|
|
|
"invntrr" <invntrr@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:k97cq1l1n8kv08aca6d63cqavb5h6ulcvp@4ax.com...
> Because I'm suing my employer under the Whistle blowers protection act.
> I had exception employee evaluations until blowing the whistle on toxic
>
|
|
|
Barry Gold wrote:
> Yes, it's also counter to the law in California. Nonetheless, how
> often do you see the left lane clear of everybody except those
> going faster than traffic to the right? How often do you see people
> in the left lane being p
|
|
|
"Don" <dwzimm@telus.net> wrote:
> "Stan Brown" <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote
>
>> Your wife is not entitled to make any money off the estate, other
>> that what she was bequeathed in the will.
>
> This is not true in a few US states and Cana
|
|
|
In article <897cq1l90sq36oi6eej5rtqumc37gu1qvu@4ax.com>,
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>Anonymous,
>
>You hired on as a telemarketer, and the company promised you much
>greater commissions than you actually earned. (As Captain Rena
|
|
|
On 18 Dec 2005, quikleap@hotmail.com took more than 750 words to
say/ask in substance no more than this:
> [ My landlord did not adequately complete a roof and ceiling
> repair job above and in our apartment, left a mess, agreed
> to schedule a mutu
|
|
|
In article <t87cq1pjlk54tcrqcjo68ifhhaa0tkin24@4ax.com>,
the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm (Stan Brown) writes:
| Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:17:43 -0500 from bregent
| <regent@dontspamme.newsguy.com>:
| > Dan, the account I have is the cash account for my broker
|
|
