|
|
"LetsNotTalkAboutIT" <letsnottalkaboutit@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8l5mq1d4he7gp00f2oitvjku59109epuer@4ax.com...
> About a year ago I was approached by a very close relative of mine to
> help out with a financial issue in his business. He ask
|
|
|
LetsNotTalkAboutIT wrote:
> About a year ago I was approached by a very close relative of mine to
> help out with a financial issue in his business. He asked that I take
> out a business Line of Credit on my name. Meaning, I become one of the
> partne
|
|
|
"LetsNotTalkAboutIT" <letsnottalkaboutit@gmail.com> wrote:
> A few months later I found out that he DID
> after all take out the loan on my name. (I must assume he filled
> out the forms and forged my signature) The business went under and
> now I'm
|
|
|
In article <vk5mq19lpgq6bvc47edfit203na2llmgnq@4ax.com>,
doubter <devnul@san.spamblockerr.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 18:13:25 -0500, "Doreen Dotan" <DoreenDotan@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Was Stanley Williams' death a case of the means of de
|
|
|
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 16:13:33 -0500, "Deadrat"
<ephemera1@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>"Doreen Dotan" <DoreenDotan@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:jjfeq1pp5ghtn63m0pr5muqou7ueglj6hr@4ax.com...
>> I forgot the term for when a condemned person is set free
|
|
|
>On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 16:13:23 -0500, mark <wajamala@yahoo.com> wrote:
>My employer claims that when I first started work
>14 years ago, one of the forms I signed contained
>a clause prohibiting me from ever working for any
>of their customers, or an
|
|
|
"mark" wrote about a perpetual non-compete agreement which his
current employer claimed he had signed long ago (but which the
employer refused to show him when requested).
It would help greatly if Mark could tell us where he is (which
state in the U
|
|
|
mark wrote:
> My employer claims that when I first started work
> 14 years ago, one of the forms I signed contained
> a clause prohibiting me from ever working for any
> of their customers, or any of their competitors,
> or ever starting my own busin
|
|
|
[This followup was posted to misc.legal.moderated and a copy was sent
to the cited author.]
Mark,
Your employer claims that you signed a paper 14 years ago promising
never to work for any of your employer's customers or competitors.
They refus
|
|
|
In article <pk5mq115baiii28gk36qa9r73nq9m9tnj5@4ax.com>,
mark <wajamala@yahoo.com> wrote:
>My employer claims that when I first started work
>14 years ago, one of the forms I signed contained
>a clause prohibiting me from ever working for any
>of th
|
|
|
mark wrote:
> My employer claims that when I first started work
> 14 years ago, one of the forms I signed contained
> a clause prohibiting me from ever working for any
> of their customers, or any of their competitors,
> or ever starting my own bus
|
|
|
mark <wajamala@yahoo.com> wrote:
> My employer claims that when I first started work
> 14 years ago, one of the forms I signed contained
> a clause prohibiting me from ever working for any
> of their customers, or any of their competitors,
> or eve
|
|
|
In article <kk5mq113g3p6ne74aanche8r70057rltuu@4ax.com>,
Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
> However, now that you are leery of this customer's
>solvency, you probably have no obligation (unless based on some fact
>you didn't post) to cont
|
|
|
Juan wrote:
> Does anyone know since when a real estate contract is valid and the 2
> parts are obligated to comply?
> I have a signed contract with a relocation company to buy a property
> from them. During attorney review, the seller's attorney (Rel
|
|
|
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 16:13:05 -0500 from Juan <jtordoya@hotmail.com>:
> Does anyone know since when a real estate contract is valid and the 2
> parts are obligated to comply?
When something of value has passed from one party to the other. If
you paid a
|
|
|
In article <gk5mq1hr2efh5vlnv0aaqv5ve3pq7503q4@4ax.com>,
Juan <jtordoya@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Does anyone know since when a real estate contract is valid and the 2
>parts are obligated to comply?
>I have a signed contract with a relocation company to b
|
|
|
"Juan" <jtordoya@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:gk5mq1hr2efh5vlnv0aaqv5ve3pq7503q4@4ax.com...
> Does anyone know since when a real estate contract is valid and the 2
> parts are obligated to comply?
> I have a signed contract with a relocation co
|
|
|
In article <gk5mq1hr2efh5vlnv0aaqv5ve3pq7503q4@4ax.com>,
"Juan" <jtordoya@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Does anyone know since when a real estate contract is valid and the 2
> parts are obligated to comply?
> I have a signed contract with a relocation comp
|
|
|
Our family is going through a situation I'm hoping someone can provide an
answer on. In 1980 my grandmother changed the deed on her property (long
ago paid for - no mortgage) so that she is listed as "Life Tenant for the
term of her natural life" and
|
|
|
I was in bumper to bumber stop and go traffic at dusk in the drizzly
rain.
I bumped the car in front of me.
I did nick her bumper from the screw on my license plate, I think.
We both were standing in the rain exchanging papers when the police
c
|
|
|
> If it comes down to an actual trial, there may be authentication issues
>-- i.e. how does the person offering the evidence prove that you are in
>fact the one who said or wrote those words?
Although in this case, he actaully did write the posti
|
|
|
In article <bk5mq1h9sbhdnhvgrr3uqsv4cvi9f8u62t@4ax.com>,
Gordon Burditt <gordonb.yleye@burditt.org> wrote:
>Are you claiming that the law firm would be acting illegally if
>they sent *ALL* Usenet postings (that is, of everyone: a full
>USENET feed)
|
|
|
I've sued two former tenants in a county court for breach of contract. One
has answered the other has not. In these types of cases a default judgment
alone cannot be filed because one defendant answered. I presume a summary
judgment alone cannot be
|
|
|
nullportal@verizonstinks.net wrote:
}:On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:40:57 -0500, nullportal@verizon.net wrote:
}:
}:Oops. It's http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html rather than with
}:"section" appended at the end. This takes you to the page where you
}:
|
|
|
Hello newsgroup,
This question is about privacy / harrasment... We all know that it is
against the law to send people unsolicited electronic mail. But what
about regular old mail that we get in our home letter boxes?
I have recently become fed up
|
|
|
Here's a simplified secenario:
- You order a bag-of-coal from me for $4 delivered, to be
paid 'on invoice', at delivery within 48 hours after taking the order.
- I duly deliver within 48 hours, but my invoice [from the dud
accounting department
|
|
|
Gene E. Utterback, EA wrote:
> "David Ellis" <antispam@nowhere.org> wrote in message
> news:65guo1hanca95etm35v4kh0q8v84c5bpep@4ax.com...
>
>>My wife and I, the trustors, wish to cancel a living trust.
>>
>>Is it sufficient to write a simple state
|
|
|
Hello, i work for a small US tech company. we made a contact in India
that we'd like to hire or subcontract. What is the procedure for that?
Can i just ask him to do some work for us and send him a check? we
agreed to pay him a flat monthly salary
|
|
|
sgupta@gupta.hn.org wrote:
[blamed for insect infestation. He denies]
>
> The condo association listening to the rep. is trying to pass the
> entire bill of exterminating the building (in thousands) to me. Can
> they do that?
You need to read y
|
|
|
In article <6k5mq152ggd704u3q9g7dajpc58nn4scfl@4ax.com>,
sgupta@gupta.hn.org wrote:
> The condo association listening to the rep. is trying to pass the
> entire bill of exterminating the building (in thousands) to me. Can
> they do that?
Sure.
|
|
|
<sgupta@gupta.hn.org> wrote in message
news:6k5mq152ggd704u3q9g7dajpc58nn4scfl@4ax.com...
> Hi,
>
> I am having serious problems with my condo association. The association
> uses a management company to manage my apartments.
>
> Recently our buidl
|
|
|
Ben S wrote:
> In any event, isn't there a code of "fighting words" that justify
> wacking someone who is assaulting you?
IIUC, and IANAL, "fighting words" are a kind of speech which is so
likely to inflame the recipient to fighting that the sp
|
|
|
I was honest about my history of drug use and stated
that I used marijuana 2 to 4 times per month from may of 2002 to
september of 2005. --- gerg1
Andy replies:
Are you nuts ? Did the DOD have any way of finding this
out other than your admi
|
|
|
In article <3k5mq194114ud7vq1vrivfh4reggcc11vq@4ax.com>,
gerg1031@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm currently a college student in MA and I have accepted an offer for
> a co-op (work for a semester instead of classes) for a DoD contractor
> in CT. My employme
|
|
|
gerg1031@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm currently a college student in MA and I have accepted an offer for
> a co-op (work for a semester instead of classes) for a DoD contractor
> in CT. My employment is contingent on obtaining confidential security
> cleara
|
|
|
This is in Virginia, USA.
The company I work for is incorporated, but
very small (about a dozen employees).
The boss man has begun to claim that the
forms that each and every technician signed
when first starting work contained a provision,
call
|
|
|
In article <t87cq1pjlk54tcrqcjo68ifhhaa0tkin24@4ax.com>, Stan Brown says...
>
>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:17:43 -0500 from bregent
><regent@dontspamme.newsguy.com>:
>>Dan, the account I have is the cash account for my brokerage acct. It is a money
>> marke
|
|
|
"Mike Jacobs" <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:asimo1d0n7f9hnr0onb6ces43ek2msj4nb@4ax.com...
> Jim Murray wrote:
> > The day before Thanksgiving, I was involved in an auto accident. The
<snip>
I wanted to thank everyone who responded a
|
|
|
> 2) Deposit's are NON REFUNDABLE. If you decide you don't want the
> puppy, you forfeit your Deposit. If something happens to said puppy
> (death, buyer doesn't like it, or wants to wait on another litter) You
> may choose from the next AVAILABLE litt
|
|
|
Raffo wrote:
> Hello Legal Newsgroup. I'm new here, and have a question:
>
> I paid a 400 dollar deposit to a dog breeder based in North Carolina,
> for a pick of one of the puppies from a litter of two dogs that I
> liked. The pups were never born
|
|
|
Raffo,
You placed a deposit on a puppy. This puppy had not yet been born. Sadly
this puppy, and the entire litter, was not born. There is a written contract
which you provide in your post. You wish a refund of the deposit.
Article 2 of this
|
|
|
Raffo wrote:
>
> According to this contract, I'm not entitled to a deposit. But what
> actually happened does not fit any of the said conditions that would
> make me forefit my deposit. The puppy did not die, because it was never
> born, because
|
|
|
In article <vj5mq1d05kf5ha1pevn272iregp0j3m290@4ax.com>,
"Raffo" <raidiniantz@gmail.com> wrote:
> I paid a 400 dollar deposit to a dog breeder based in North Carolina,
> for a pick of one of the puppies from a litter of two dogs that I
> liked. The
|
|
|
"Raffo" <raidiniantz@gmail.com> wrote:
> I paid a 400 dollar deposit to a dog breeder based in North
> Carolina, for a pick of one of the puppies from a litter of two
> dogs that I liked. The pups were never born, because the female
> had a "false
|
|
|
"Raffo" <raidiniantz@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:vj5mq1d05kf5ha1pevn272iregp0j3m290@4ax.com...
> Hello Legal Newsgroup. I'm new here, and have a question:
>
> I paid a 400 dollar deposit to a dog breeder based in North Carolina,
> for a pick of
|
|
|
Rick wrote:
[agency changes mission. drops case manager and clients]
> AFAIK this agency accepts State funding to provide these services, not
> Federal funding. Beyond this being pretty morally reprehensible, is it
> true that there was nothing done
|
|