|
|
mark <wajamala@yahoo.com> wrote:
> My employer claims that when I first started work
> 14 years ago, one of the forms I signed contained
> a clause prohibiting me from ever working for any
> of their customers, or any of their competitors,
> or ev
|
|
|
"A Michigan Attorney" <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote:
> Aside from a dec action, I know of no law that you can invoke
> merely to compel production of this alleged agreement.
California has a provision allowing discovery prior to having to file a
l
|
|
|
I am looking into incorporating a one man shop (myself) for the purpose of a
consulting company. I have tried to find this out but I haven't had any luck
searching for it so I will ask here, excuse me if this is a silly question.
Can you incorporate
|
|
|
In article <kjf0r19ab7hnq6e6qj8s93fsehe87imbci@4ax.com>,
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 16:13:05 -0500 from Juan <jtordoya@hotmail.com>:
>> Does anyone know since when a real estate contract is valid and the 2
>> par
|
|
|
I have a question regarding a person who took advantage of my good
intentions. This took place in the State of Indiana. I sold a mobile home
to a person and his wife and got paid for the home, no problem. They had to
wait, however, till their old mo
|
|
|
Have any of you seen the Feature Films for Families movie "Who Gets the
House?" Some commentators on the IMDb about this film thought it
utterly unbelievable that a child could have gotten a court order by
which a judge ordered the parents to keep the
|
|
|
In article <djf0r152lkcal3pphvgof6d3mljre9jnou@4ax.com>,
Lee & Nicole Thompson <the_thompsons@highstream.net> wrote:
>Our family is going through a situation I'm hoping someone can provide an
>answer on. In 1980 my grandmother changed the deed on her
|
|
|
mswlogo wrote:
> I was in bumper to bumber stop and go traffic at dusk in the drizzly
> rain.
>
> I bumped the car in front of me.
>
> I did nick her bumper from the screw on my license plate, I think.
<snip>
> Now I get a letter in the mail f
|
|
|
Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:08:01 -0500 from mswlogo <geomills@gmail.com>:
> Now I get a letter in the mail from my insurance that the other person
> is seeking bodily injury (I have max coverage).
>
> What can I do?
You've already notified your insurance
|
|
|
mswlogo wrote:
[says small collision can't have resulted in injury, but other party so
claims]
>
> Should I get my own Lawyer, I don't want this person to get a dime or
> just let insurance company handle it?
>
You have a choice. Either you
|
|
|
>>Are you claiming that the law firm would be acting illegally if
>>they sent *ALL* Usenet postings (that is, of everyone: a full
>>USENET feed) to the Department of Labor?
>
>Yes.
>
>That would be a DoS attack against DoL.
Even if the DoL *PAID
|
|
|
In article <3jf0r1le5prd0khgdiaq89o17qh2rea04g@4ax.com>,
Raffo <raidiniantz@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hello newsgroup,
>
>This question is about privacy / harrasment... We all know that it is
>against the law to send people unsolicited electronic mail.
O
|
|
|
Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:07:48 -0500 from Raffo <raidiniantz@gmail.com>:
> We all know that it is
> against the law to send people unsolicited electronic mail.
No, we don't know that, because it's not true. Sending junk e-mail is
perfectly legal. Some s
|
|
|
In article <3jf0r1le5prd0khgdiaq89o17qh2rea04g@4ax.com>,
"Raffo" <raidiniantz@gmail.com> wrote:
> The other stuff is junk to me, and if it is a crime to send unsolicited
> email, then why shouldn't it be the same with regular mail?
1) It's not a
|
|
|
In article <3jf0r1le5prd0khgdiaq89o17qh2rea04g@4ax.com>,
Raffo <raidiniantz@gmail.com> wrote:
>This question is about privacy / harrasment... We all know that it is
>against the law to send people unsolicited electronic mail.
We wish it were, but
|
|
|
Raffo wrote:
[wants to end junk USPS mail by notifying the senders that he opts out]
>
> If they continue to send the unwanted mail, and I continue to ask them
> not to send it, does this not constitute harrasment, and can I not take
> them to court
|
|
|
On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:07:48 -0500, "Raffo" <raidiniantz@gmail.com>
wrote:
>[I]f it is a crime to send unsolicited
>email, then why shouldn't it be the same with regular mail?...
It is illegal to send unsolicited e-mail to people who have register
|
|
|
"Raffo" <raidiniantz@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3jf0r1le5prd0khgdiaq89o17qh2rea04g@4ax.com...
> Hello newsgroup,
>
> Raffo.
>
"snip"
OP wants less postal junk mail - "don't we all"....
I don't really have any experience with the mail
|
|
|
I recorded a $5,000 small claims judgment lien against a Nevada
residential home in 2001. I just discovered that the mortgage company
foreclosed on the home in 2002 (the owner did not declare bankruptcy,
though). The home was sold at auction in 2002
|
|
|
On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:07:44 -0500, news@absamail.co.za wrote:
>Here's a simplified secenario:
>- You order a bag-of-coal from me for $4 delivered, to be
> paid 'on invoice', at delivery within 48 hours after taking the order.
>- I duly deliver wi
|
|
|
David Ellis <antispam@nowhere.org> wrote:
> Gene, sorry to be away so long. We want to cancel the trust
> because we don't understand it. It was prepared six years
> ago by an attorney on loan from a wealthy friend. The
> revocable trust appears
|
|
|
Gerg wrote:
>> I was honest about my history of drug use and stated
>> that I used marijuana 2 to 4 times per month from may of 2002 to
>> september of 2005. --- gerg1
I couldn't find the reference, but there was an article in my local
paper tha
|
|
|
"John A. Weeks III" <john@johnweeks.com> wrote in message
news:kif0r11h45rahe7shdkj435mg9v99rdqrq@4ax.com...
> In article <3k5mq194114ud7vq1vrivfh4reggcc11vq@4ax.com>,
> gerg1031@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > I'm currently a college student in MA and I h
|
|
|
mark <wajamala@yahoo.com> wrote:
> This is in Virginia, USA.
>
> The boss man has begun to claim that the
> forms that each and every technician signed
> when first starting work contained a provision,
> called a non-competition pact, which prohi
|
|
|
Dan Lanciani <ddl@danlan.*com> wrote:
> In article <kvutp1lehb7vrngso5nau8ofdk5tatte23@4ax.com>,
> prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com writes:
> | Dan Lanciani <ddl@danlan.*com> wrote:
> [...]
> | > I apologize for not having anything useful to tell you, but
|
|
|
Raffo wrote:
> Hello Legal Newsgroup. I'm new here, and have a question:
>
> I paid a 400 dollar deposit to a dog breeder based in North Carolina,
> for a pick of one of the puppies from a litter of two dogs that I
> liked. The pups were never born
|
|
|
Raffo <raidiniantz@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Legal Newsgroup. I'm new here, and have a question:
> And we do not want the next available litter, because the dogs produced
> in the next available one have en entirely different look from the one
> we
|
|
