|
|
on 3/7/2006 10:59 AM Stan said the following:
> mercer2005a@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>>I was laid off two years ago. My compensation package was settled by a
>>lawyer. I signed an agreement with my previous employer for not
>>releasing any information abo
|
|
|
Pennsylvania megamart sold relative defective house-cleaning equipment.
Following manufacturer's instructions, relative nearly sliced finger
off. Resulting damage was determined soft-tissue only that will heal.
Megamart managers all agree product i
|
|
|
In article <sslr0213ce0n2lgkih7cnfc7hib7r34fbb@4ax.com>,
Deadrat <ephemera1@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
><duh@rthlnk.net> wrote in message
>news:f5co02h1mogk29vikcl2hu1q7k7ttgjt6c@4ax.com...
>> fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote:
>>
>> >> Assume an exemption o
|
|
|
"Deadrat" <ephemera1@sbcglobal.net> writes:
> > The beneficiary of A's trust is B, with B very explicitly NOT one
> > of the trustees. It is B not being a trustee (along with trust
> > language limiting B's power over the trustees) that prevents B f
|
|
|
"Deadrat" <ephemera1@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> There's a limit (currently $11K), any amount beyond which reduces
> A's estate tax exemption.
Starting January 1, the amount was increased to $12,000.
Stu
|
|
|
"Deadrat" <ephemera1@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> "Rich Carreiro" <rlcarr@animato.arlington.ma.us> wrote
>> The beneficiary of A's trust is B, with B very explicitly NOT one
>> of the trustees. It is B not being a trustee (along with trust
>> language
|
|
|
on 3/6/2006 4:56 AM Tom in Oregon said the following:
> I was divorced about a year ago and have been making regular alimony
> payments. Last week two men from an insurance company paid me a visit and
> told me my ex-wife had made a claim for $10,000
|
|
|
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> Sigh. You're confusing _criminal_ law, where usually(*) a person is
> innocent till proven guilty, with _civil_ law. When someone claims
> you owe money, if the claim looks reasonable then the burden s
|
|
|
on 3/6/2006 4:56 AM Carlos said the following:
>
> In Jun 2005, I received a letter from the SSA saying "next month
> we will be deducting about 10% of your pension for over one year as a
> reimbursement of an overpayment we made in the past". The
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote:
> In article <qj9902pvea82spp9d70aupmkicli3va8cf@4ax.com>,
> AndyS <andysharpe@juno.com> wrote:
>> What it "boils down to" is that any Email, or messge, sent over the
>>INTERNET is exactly the same as if you
|
|
|
Tue, 07 Mar 2006 13:58:58 -0500 from Seth Breidbart
<sethb@panix.com>:
> In article <r4co02dlrj243bvm4ct3vp514petdpjiuf@4ax.com>,
> bat <bat@bats.com> wrote:
[scenario: one starts receiving spam at an address that was provided
only to a brokerage f
|
|
|
on 3/6/2006 4:55 AM John said the following:
> My parents are buying a piece of real estate and I anticipate being
> pressured into supporting them financially.
What does that mean? That they want you to help pay? How so? Without
more of an unde
|
|
|
>I interested in
>writing a business proposal (basically a suggestion backed with intensive
>research and number crunching) to a large fortune 500 company.
If they DO "steal" your idea, you aren't any worse off than you are
now.
I would probably
|
|
|
Hi
Does anyone know the answer to this?
In bidding in a real estate partition action, does the party need to
have a cashier's check for the entire amount of the property, or just
the portion of the other parties?
For example, let's say that Jo
|
|
|
Are there any legal implications to using speech from movies and
designing merchandise based on it.
Example: I've noticed that many many people have designed t-shirts,
hats etc with quotes from Napoleon Dynamite on cafepress.com. It
clearly, to me any
|
|
|
In article <e10cv1h8uesf97pviqi672hqjrrfbvipbm@4ax.com>,
Jonathan Sachs <xxxxxxx@earthlink.not> wrote:
>On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:40:34 -0500, sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart)
>wrote:
>
>>Yet I still see "Long Island Duckling" on menus even though it h
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart wrote:
> In article <t3co02h9gtq6sunro740dhmqrs5i6898u5@4ax.com>,
> Peanut <freetohitit@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >I was terminated from my job, no reason- just "at will" employee. New
> >management took over and I don't think the guy liked
|
|
|
In article <grlr02p6af70dkdn9rn1vr46hhdg5moedn@4ax.com>,
Mike Jacobs <mjacobslaw@gmail.com> wrote:
>Also, suing someone is a real good way to have them countersue for
>whatever wrongs they may allege you may ever have done against them in
>any circu
|
|
|
On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 13:58:38 -0500, Stan Brown
<the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>I'm glad to hear it, since the Peter Zenger case is pretty well
>documented. :-)
I wince whenever the Zenger case is mentioned in this context. It
can't be un
|
|
|
On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 13:58:36 -0500, fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote:
>From:
>
> _The Constitution of Maryland_
>
> Declaration of Rights
>
> Art. 23. In the trial of all criminal cases,
> the Jury shall be the Judge
|
|
|
on 3/7/2006 10:58 AM prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com said the following:
> Jonathan Sachs <xxxxxxx@earthlink.not> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:38:21 -0500, knowyourights@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>>>Does anybody have any info as to when the last time it
|
|
|
how binding is a job offer letter?
I have accepted a job with firm A and have also signed the offer
letter. I have got this other job offer today with firm B. This has
been the firm I have wanted right from the start but there was a delay
in offerin
|
|
|
> I'm going to ask for traffic school for the first ticket. Do you
> think I can contest and beat the second ticket which I got at the same
> time as the first one? If so, what would be appropriate to say to the
> judge?
Plead not-guilty to the 2n
|
|
|
Tue, 07 Mar 2006 13:58:35 -0500 from peter83810 <peter83810
@hotmail.com>:
[pulled over for running a stop sign, ran a second one while entering
parking lot to meet the officer]
> I'm going to ask for traffic school for the first ticket. Do you
|
|
|
<mercer2005b@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ktlr02p0ad9k4r90di6llpvenq5j56maib@4ax.com...
> I was laid off two years ago. My compensation package was settled by a
> lawyer. I signed an agreement with my previous employer for not
> releasing any
|
|
|
Tue, 07 Mar 2006 13:58:34 -0500 from <mercer2005b@yahoo.com>:
> I was laid off two years ago. My compensation package was settled by a
> lawyer. I signed an agreement with my previous employer for not
> releasing any information about my case.
An a
|
|
|
Hello I have an MBNA personal line of credit that I've had for 12
years. I never have missed or have been late on 1 payment ever. Last
month I used MBNA's phone pay service to make my min payment. I got a
letter today that says my account is overdue
|
|
|
on 3/7/2006 10:58 AM David Martel said the following:
> Marian,
>
> You have a neighbor whose property is "land locked". For quite a long
> time he has used your land as his driveway. You wish to sell him an easement
> but he is not interested
|
|
|
fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote:
> Of course everyone knows that women want to sleep with doctors
> and rocket scientists, not lawyers.
I agree with that last part. Why do something in bed that the lawyer does to
you all the time everywhere else? ;)
|
|
|
sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
> <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>>I dunno...seems like lying to a woman to get her to hop in the bed
>>with you is getting them to act in a pretty functional way<g>
>
> But in most states, it's illegal
|
|
|
JW> "At this time we are not able to accept your claim of fraud because:
JW> We contacted the merchant and learned that your personal information
JW> was used to place the order. Based on this we have determined that you
JW> benefited from this ac
|
|
|
fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote:
> cozmicflatfish@aol.com wrote:
>> ok, lets say a fan or someone posts some things on an official band (a
>> very big band) website message board.
>>
>> and they're questions. not really statement made.
>>
>>
>> ((
|
|
|
The poster lives in the USA...
The band lives in the UK.
The website most of this happened was on a big fan board that is
technically in the running to become the official forum. it is based
out of California... and the official board is based out of
|
|
|
Tue, 07 Mar 2006 13:58:24 -0500 from <fredfighter@spamcop.net>:
> Seriously, look abroad and consider how many 'opposition' party
> leaders are tried and convicted of various crimes. That is a very
> good reason why the Constitution does not and sho
|
|
|
In article <u2co02deltdu8q3hm43aqgnhj0eicl4dtg@4ax.com>,
<prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote:
>> In article <jlg6025q9rck8834advcvefbt59upookf9@4ax.com>,
>> <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>
>>>Ok, I had for
|
|
|
On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 13:58:23 -0500, prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
>The term isn't misleading at all, really, when the term "hire" is used
>properly. When you "hire" someone to work for you, that usually implies that
>you employed them in the full s
|
|
|
prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
> fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote:
>
> ...
>
> You verbally "contract" with a cabbie when you hop into his cab
> and request a ride to the airport), you do none of these. Although I'll agre
> that the herm "hire" do
|
|
|
Jonathan Sachs <xxxxxxx@earthlink.not> wrote:
> Unless things have changed very recently, California does not
> allow reciprocity, and neither does Arizona. Only a small number
> of states that recognize other states' licenses by comity (without
>
|
|
|
prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
> fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote:
>
> > prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
> >> fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote:
> >>
> >> > cruiz@canf.org wrote:
> >> >> We are in the process of selling a property purchased only two ye
|
|
|
> (Sure, we're not the only ones in the hemispher ewho could be called
> Americans ,
> but then we're not the only United States in the hemisphere either.)
Well, maybe--- but the fact is that the USA's full name is "The United
States of America" and
|
|
|
on 3/7/2006 10:58 AM jcgouldt said the following:
> In the case of John D Wood & Co (Reseidential & Agricultural) Ltd v
> Knatchbull what was the effect on agency practice??
>
Uhhhh, we might need some more info about the case to give an opinion.
|
|
|
"jcgouldt" <gouldy20@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
> In the case of John D Wood & Co (Reseidential & Agricultural) Ltd v
> Knatchbull what was the effect on agency practice??
Since the agent always has a duty of utmost good faith, the decision
was unrema
|
|
|
I had a verbal argument with a fellow employee on the job,the employee
then reported to my supervisor that I threatened him but I did not. I
then received a call from the railroad police stating that this matter
was reported to them and due to new work
|
|
