|
|
Stan Brown wrote:
> Sun, 12 Mar 2006 23:11:52 -0500 from Mike Jacobs
> <mjacobslaw@gmail.com>:
> > If all your relative got was a
> > cut finger, which healed completely, it's probably not worth much.
>
> Generic question (not about this specific c
|
|
|
Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
>> Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote:
>
>>> If A and B are married, there's no limit (which is currently
>>> $12K if they aren't).
>>
>> But maybe A doesn
|
|
|
Barry,
In this matter where the OP may have received overpayment in his
termination package and is being hounded by a collection agency is there in
fact a "debt"?When did the OP enter into this debt? I'm not convinced that
attempting to damage
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote:
> In article <ksu0121psrm2f9e0me89oe71fsisj5hpsm@4ax.com>,
> <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>>Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote:
>>> In article <qj9902pvea82spp9d70aupmkicli3va8cf@4ax.com>,
>>> AndyS <
|
|
|
Timothy <Timothy.Horrigan@alumni.usc.edu> wrote:
>>I interested in
>>writing a business proposal (basically a suggestion backed with intensive
>>research and number crunching) to a large fortune 500 company.
> If they DO "steal" your idea, you aren'
|
|
|
This is another question about the same mortgage company in my prior
post.
5 years ago my daughter purchased her first home. She was also
diagnosed with cancer.
The mortgage company wouldn't sell her life insurance due to her
illness so they were a
|
|
|
This is a reminder about the misc.legal.moderated policy on
submissions containing munged headers such as
From: biff@willy.NOSPAMloman.org
1. Posters are free to munge headers (leaving aside forgeries in the
name of an actual third party). Spammer
|
|
|
In article <32s91250v89ahesvd8jpjfu4c2gq7lnofg@4ax.com>,
bazzz777@yahoo.com <bazzz777@yahoo.com> wrote:
>I have a Sprint PCS phone of which I'm six months into a 2 year
>contract. I bought the phone when I lived in NYC and it worked fine.
>Now I'm liv
|
|
|
In article <p1s912ps1alsm33gk57lsoue36clpd2k72@4ax.com>,
Barry Gold <bgold@nyx.net> wrote:
>
>The article also mentions the controversy around JN, including the
>refusal of all white juries to convict for the murder of
>African-Americans during the c
|
|
|
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 23:10:54 -0500, Stan Brown
<the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>Either I don't understand your objection or it doesn't make sense. Of
>_course_ the Zenger jury's decision was political: that's the whole
>point....
>Should Dr
|
|
|
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 23:11:03 -0500, prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
>I wasn't aware that ANY trial judge has to write opinions for ANY trial, be
>it a trial by jury OR a trial by judge (but I could be wrong there.) The
>appeals court doesn't look at
|
|
|
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 23:11:00 -0500, fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote:
>If the undisputed facts were not suffieicient to sustain a conviction
>the judge should have dismissed the case before it got to the jury.
You are oversimplifying. If there is ANY
|
|
|
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 23:10:51 -0500, Stan Brown
<the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>I'm not a lawyer, but I don't see the problem. It seems to me as
>clear as any constitution can be.
I could cite many examples, in areas more familiar to me than
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote:
> In article <a1s91298d9i67siep9f87jlpboimq8l0ic@4ax.com>,
> <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>>Stan <stanleykr@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> I'm going to ask for traffic school for the first ticket. Do you
>>
|
|
|
RichardZ <spotthedogz@yahoo.com> wrote:
> The original poster wrote that he got a second ticket
> while obeying an officer's order to pull into a
> parking lot, and there by went through a second stop
> sign, hence the second ticket.
> Assuming I u
|
|
|
G Wheelock <gwheelock@comcast.net> wrote:
>This is a hypothetical question regarding the New York "Bodysnatcher"
>case that was featured on Thursday night's ABC News & Primetime shows.
>
>The shows allege that a bunch of mortuaries and a medical suppl
|
|
|
Tue, 14 Mar 2006 00:11:23 -0500 from David Martel <marte005
@earthlink.net>:
> When a fake title passes through several sets of hands courts will
> recognize that the title becomes genuine.
That's fascinating, and I've never heard of this. I though
|
|
|
In article <h0kc12pvf2p5inqjle17rhabebcgbs5ka1@4ax.com>,
David Martel <marte005@earthlink.net> wrote:
> When a fake title passes through several sets of hands courts will
>recognize that the title becomes genuine.
When did that start happening?
|
|
|
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 00:11:18 -0500, "Ted Banks" <dwzimm@telus.net>
wrote:
>Would it be O.K. if I just said nothing to anybody, not
>even my own lawyer, and waited a few months before cashing in the ticket?
In most states if you hid assets the di
|
|
|
Ted Banks wrote:
> I am getting a divorce that will be finalized in a couple more months.
> Everything has been agreed upon between myself and my wife, including
> generous alimony payments, selling of our house with the money to be shared,
> and pa
|
|
|
Ted Banks wrote:
[claims to have bought a winning lottery ticket and didn't disclose
during divorce property settlement]
> Would it be O.K. if I just said nothing to anybody, not
> even my own lawyer, and waited a few months before cashing in th
|
|
|
Tue, 14 Mar 2006 00:11:18 -0500 from Ted Banks <dwzimm@telus.net>:
> I am getting a divorce that will be finalized in a couple more
> months. Everything has been agreed upon between myself and my wife,
> ... payment of the lawyer's fees.
I _do_ hope
|
|
|
"Ted Banks" <dwzimm@telus.net> wrote:
> I am getting a divorce that will be finalized in a couple more
> months. Everything has been agreed upon between myself and my
> wife, including generous alimony payments, selling of our house
> with the money
|
|
|
I received a letter from a mortgage company (unsolicited) stating that
I met their criteria based on information obtained from a credit
bureau.
I didn't give them permission and I was wondering if that is legal? I
live in Oregon and the company is b
|
|
|
cozmicflatfish@aol.com wrote:
> prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
>> fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote:
>>
>> No matter how famouse, you can be guilty of libel/slander if you said
>> "[singer] is a crook", knowing it not to be true, but you can't be (I d
|
|
|
Tue, 14 Mar 2006 00:11:07 -0500 from <cozmicflatfish@aol.com>:
> prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
> > fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote:
> >
> > No matter how famouse, you can be guilty of libel/slander if you said
> > "[singer] is a crook", knowing it n
|
|
|
Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote:
> In article <lqr912594uchpttfnv7an1878141ng349c@4ax.com>,
> <prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com> wrote:
>>Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> wrote:
>>> But in the case at hand, suppose the defendant as a last resort
>>>
|
|
|
In article <bqr912d12d8cbhs8rf00qad2i1im4lou9u@4ax.com>,
<johnp_martinez@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Does anyone know if there is a statute of limitations on collecting
>child support and alimony for California? My mother has a court order
>dated some 15 year
|
|
|
Tue, 14 Mar 2006 00:10:24 -0500 from Mike Jacobs
<mjacobslaw@gmail.com>:
> Why not just take a draw and invest
> your own personal money in a personal account? Unless I'm really
> missing something I don't see any tax or other advantage to doing i
|
|
