|
|
In article <vnvo12p6791rutaul8l6e9k738ben85bhl@4ax.com>,
<jbraly@gmail.com> wrote:
>My wife's ex boy friend of like 9 years ago knew her sosical security
>number and opened about 6 credit and department store cards in her and
>his name (joint accou
|
|
|
Crimson wrote:
> State law also says that the "Marriage licenses are valid for 90 days
> from the date of issuance. If you do not get married within 90 days,
> the license will no longer be valid." What is you have the ceremony
> BEFORE getting the
|
|
|
Crimson wrote:
> ...
[OP describes various clerical irregularities regaring his/her
marriage]
>
> Is there a chance we're not legally married? If so, how may we proceed
> to make this invalidity legal -- and start over when we are ready?
Ma
|
|
|
"Crimson" <locksqueeze@hotmail.com> wrote:
> NOW FOR OUR DILEMMA:
> We were "married" in California in a ceremony by a licensed
> minister, spontaneously. We purchased a confidential marriage
> license three days later, sent it to the minister, and
|
|
|
Plaintiff (condo buyer) claims 'breach of contract' in regard to the
purchase of a condo from the sponsor company (an LLC). 2-3 weeks before
the scheduled closing, a 'punch list' is created during the 'walk
through' listing repairs contingent to the sa
|
|
|
John Hyde wrote:
>
> Remember, just because someone is wrong does not mean that they are out
> to get you, acting against the law, unconstitutional, or anything else.
> It just means that they are wrong.
>
> If you spend all your time pounding o
|
|
|
Stan Brown wrote:
>
> And you _had_ due process of law, but you chose not to avail yourself
> of its protections. Due process consisted n sending you a notice and
> giving you a reasonable time to respond. You chose not to respond in
> the required
|
|
|
Barry Gold wrote:(...)
>
> It doesn't matter. If you receive the ticket in the mail the next
> day, a month later, or 23 years later, you follow the instructions on
> the "notice to appear", which tell you how to contest it. If you
> don't, the cou
|
|
|
Mike Jacobs wrote:
> > (...)
;
>
> No, you missed the point entirely. My example assumes and explicitly
> states that the person in the example (whom I do not mean to be "you"
> personally, BTW, that was just a figure of speech, as a hypothetica
|
|
|
Suzie-Q wrote:
> I have been know to remove a restorable item or two from my neighbor's
> trash on more than one occasion. Whenever I see unusual items in
> a neighbor's trash I'll go over and see if there's anything I can
> use.
>
> A few days ag
|
|
|
Suzie-Q wrote:
> I have been know to remove a restorable item or two from my neighbor's
> trash on more than one occasion. Whenever I see unusual items in
> a neighbor's trash I'll go over and see if there's anything I can
> use.
>
> A few days ago
|
|
|
Suzie-Q wrote:
> I have been know to remove a restorable item or two from my neighbor's
> trash on more than one occasion. Whenever I see unusual items in
> a neighbor's trash I'll go over and see if there's anything I can
> use.
>
> A few days ago
|
|
|
Suzie-Q wrote:
> ...
>
> A few days ago I drove by a house where there was a lot of furniture,
> etc., out by the curb. At first I thought "trash" but then I realized
> it was probably the property of someone who had been evicted and their
> perso
|
|
|
In article <8qsv12tqprd62faj8u4moq4b4d1v7hq9a5@4ax.com>,
kjhosein@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm considering forming an LLC for its (potential) liability
> protections over a sole proprietorship or partnership. I understand the
> financial liability protec
|
|
|
<kjhosein@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8qsv12tqprd62faj8u4moq4b4d1v7hq9a5@4ax.com...
> Hello,
>
> I'm considering forming an LLC for its (potential) liability
> protections over a sole proprietorship or partnership. I understand the
> financial
|
|
|
<kjhosein@gmail.com> wrote:
>I'm considering forming an LLC for its (potential) liability
>protections over a sole proprietorship or partnership. I understand the
>financial liability protection that it gives, but am wondering about
>some other cases.
|
|
|
Tue, 21 Mar 2006 07:40:12 -0500 from <kjhosein@gmail.com>:
> if someone sues your
> company, what is your personal liability in these cases?
They _won't_ just sue the company; they'll sue you personally as
well.
--
If you e-mail me from a fak
|
|
|
kjhosein@gmail.com wrote:
> Yep, I realize these are all along the same lines, but I wanted
> to cover the point adequately. So the question is: if someone
> sues your company, what is your personal liability in these
> cases?
A corporation or a
|
|
|
In article <8qsv12tqprd62faj8u4moq4b4d1v7hq9a5@4ax.com>,
<kjhosein@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I'm considering forming an LLC for its (potential) liability
>protections over a sole proprietorship or partnership. I understand the
>financial liabili
|
|
|
Robert Bonomi wrote:
> In article <32s91250v89ahesvd8jpjfu4c2gq7lnofg@4ax.com>,
> bazzz777@yahoo.com <bazzz777@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >I have a Sprint PCS phone of which I'm six months into a 2 year
> >contract. I bought the phone when I lived in NYC a
|
|
|
Robert Bonomi wrote:
>*NEVER* sign something you "don't understand".
This is becoming more difficult to do. I have a college degree from UC
Berkeley and 10 years experience as a programmer and even I have
trouble reading all the convoluted legales
|
|
|
Jonathan Sachs wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 16:46:10 -0500, fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote:
>
> >...natural law and human law are fundamentally different. Nature
> >enforces her own laws regardless of any debate and there is no appeal.
>
> Obvious
|
|
|
Tue, 21 Mar 2006 07:39:45 -0500 from Antipodean Bucket Farmer
<usenet2006@THE-DOMAIN-IN.SIG>:
> Sounds to me like it would still be contempt. What's the problem
> with swearing the oath?
Some religious people have a doctrinal objection. Some non-
|
|
|
>"BoyntonStu" <stu@aaronj.com> wrote in message
[snip]
>> Has there ever been a prosecution fot not swearing the Juror Oath?
>>
>> (I do not mean failure to perform duties as a sworn Juror ie. Contempt)
>>
>>
>> Curious.
Dane <quack_deala@ho
|
|
|
"What's the problem with swearing the oath?"
If you want to volunteer to be sworn in as a Juror; nothing.
If there is a Law that requires you, a Prospectiver Juror to be sworn
in, that is another (legal) matter.
I want to learn what the Law real
|
|
|
Is there any way to deal with a judge that is making it difficult for a
person in court based on a past exerience (not legal). This is in New
York state. I am conserned that a formal complaint will make the
situation worse?
|
|
|
pami1968@aol.com wrote:
> I apologize for this question, which I have a feeling is really basic.
> I am the executor of my mother's estate and she has two
> beneficiaries... myself and my brother.
> I am currently in a financial crisis of my own and w
|
|
|
<pami1968@aol.com> wrote in message
news:opsv12910l9tmbesl29s77hcpn7k6vgdc5@4ax.com...
>I apologize for this question, which I have a feeling is really basic.
> I am the executor of my mother's estate and she has two
> beneficiaries... myself and my
|
|
|
pami1968@aol.com wrote:
> I apologize for this question, which I have a feeling is really
> basic. I am the executor of my mother's estate and she has two
> beneficiaries... myself and my brother.
> I am currently in a financial crisis of my own and
|
|
|
Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> "Barb" <Bas623@verizon.net> wrote:
>> Had my will, advance directive and power of attorney done
>> several years ago. Have since moved to another state and need
>> to know if these documents are
|
|
|
Paul Cassel wrote:
> Stan Brown wrote:
>
>>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 12:43:27 -0500 from Paul Cassel <pcasselremove2
>>@comremovecast.net>:
>>
>>>Ted Banks wrote:
>>>
>>>[claims to have bought a winning lottery ticket and didn't disclose
>>>during divor
|
|
|
John Weeks writes:
>Yes, a company can pull your credit history for marketing
>purposes. Those kinds of credit checks do not count against
>you.
Every year I get a letter from Experian saying I am entitled to free
credit report because of the nu
|
|
|
sethb@panix.com (Seth Breidbart) wrote:
> Stuart A. Bronstein <spamtrap@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>Since he
>>got a mistrial in NJ, the judge might even rule that he cannot
>>introduce evidence that the murder occurred in NY instead of NJ.
>
> Hu
|
|
|
In article <fosv12dosrt3gu0hfnkvtmvlu96oeej0r4@4ax.com>,
craigh01@gmail.com wrote:
> I decided to cancel my Capital One credit card. I was told that it can
> be "marked for closing", but that it can't be cancelled until I pay off
> the balance and
|
|
|
Tue, 21 Mar 2006 07:37:25 -0500 from <craigh01@gmail.com>:
> I decided to cancel my Capital One credit card. I was told that it can
> be "marked for closing", but that it can't be cancelled until I pay off
> the balance and it goes though 2 full bill
|
|
|
craigh01@gmail.com wrote:
> I decided to cancel my Capital One credit card. I was told that it can
> be "marked for closing", but that it can't be cancelled until I pay off
> the balance and it goes though 2 full billing cycles!!!
> That makes me v
|
|
|
craigh01@gmail.com wrote:
> I decided to cancel my Capital One credit card. I was told that it can
> be "marked for closing", but that it can't be cancelled until I pay off
> the balance and it goes though 2 full billing cycles!!!
>
> That makes me
|
|
|
<craigh01@gmail.com> wrote:
> I decided to cancel my Capital One credit card. I was told that
> it can be "marked for closing", but that it can't be cancelled
> until I pay off the balance and it goes though 2 full billing
> cycles!!!
It woul
|
|
|
bay.of.arizona@gmail.com wrote:
(suing car dealership over consignment sale of vehicle)
> 4) I would like to sue for the maximum small claims limit, recently
> raised to 7500 dollars. I am planning on putting 10,000 extra in
> emotional distress and
|
|
|
Tue, 21 Mar 2006 07:37:13 -0500 from AND Books <andbooks@ripco.com>:
> my partner/owner of a book distribution company extended some 300K
> credit to an incorporated bookstore chain which has since closed all
> all of its stores, then proceeded to retu
|
|
|
AND Books wrote:
> my partner/owner of a book distribution company extended some 300K
> credit to an incorporated bookstore chain which has since closed all
> all of its stores, then proceeded to return all of its inventory,
> a standard practice in
|
|
|
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 07:37:13 -0500, AND Books <andbooks@ripco.com>
wrote:
>
>i've *always* believed that subchapter "S" coporations cannot claim
>such immunity, but since being in business the 60's, they claim that
>since they never signed a pers
|
|
|
In article <bosv1250hdkrb4hu5ep04m6o7nrq3k87sa@4ax.com>,
AND Books <andbooks@ripco.com> wrote:
>my partner/owner of a book distribution company extended some 300K
>credit to an incorporated bookstore chain which has since closed all
>all of its store
|
|
|
AND Books <andbooks@ripco.com> wrote:
> i've *always* believed that subchapter "S" coporations cannot
> claim such immunity, but since being in business the 60's, they
> claim that since they never signed a personal note of
> responsibilty for the s
|
|
|
AND Books <andbooks@ripco.com> wrote:
> my partner/owner of a book distribution company extended some 300K
> credit ....
In my rarely humble opinion, you are in desparate need of the best
Bankruptcy Creditors attorney you can find. $200,000 in bad
|
|
